Home Archives Random Quotes Latest Comments Top 100 Submit Quote Search Log In Forums

Quote# 7118

...although Lubenow does make one reference to some recently observed volcanic lava forming igneous rock which was subsequently forwarded for dating tests which discovered the rocks to be several hundred thousand and even a million years old.

Talk about scientifically blasting holes in evolutionist theories and concepts of time substantiated only by unverifiable theories of nuclear decay over vast periods of imaginary time.

jcrawford, Debating Christianity 5 Comments [8/26/2005 12:00:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 1
WTF?! || meh
Username:
Comment:



1
#943
Crosis

Funny thing is, anyone who's studied radiological dating AT ALL knows damn well about that particular phenomenon. (In fact, I seem to recall that the cretinists who did that test chose the site AFTER the anomalous data was already published and explained.)

8/27/2005 5:42:56 AM
#978
DarthWang

Gee, did you ever think that maybe the rock dated that old BECAUSE IT WAS LAVA FROM THE MANTLE OF THE EARTH!!?!?

Idiot.

8/27/2005 9:06:49 PM
#53406
Puistokemisti

Actually, from what little I remember from geology, the apparent age was because of fast-decaying radiactive materials were trapped inside the rock as it cooled very quickly.
I could be wrong though.

7/18/2006 9:05:32 AM
#926758
Timon

Say it with me MET-AH-MOR-FIC-ROCK

3/21/2009 4:45:13 AM
#1302965
Quantum Mechanic

Another F in quantum mechanics, not to mention volcanology and geology.

6/25/2011 3:05:19 PM
1