1 2 3
Wealth disparity?. Tell it to women who earn 23% less than men with equal job.
3/15/2010 10:38:08 AM
Men fighting each other for sex?. That's nature, man.
3/15/2010 10:38:45 AM
Sounds like an interesting sociology research project. Go collect data for ten years then come back and let us know your findings. Otherwise, shut the hell up as it's obvious you know nothing.
3/15/2010 10:45:33 AM
You mean to tell me even a gay man won't have sex with you?
3/15/2010 10:50:01 AM
I bet five bucks that this guy doesn't exist in the same dimension where humans live.
3/15/2010 10:55:02 AM
what a foolish thing to say: it all went down hill once that whore, Eve, listened to that damned serpent.....
3/15/2010 10:55:14 AM
Men screw other men over because women have greater freedom?! Buddy, i hate to break it to you, that was happening long, long, LOOOOOONG before women's lib.
Hate to break it to you, bucko. The evils of the world did not come about because the mean old wimminfolk forgot their place. And with an attitude like that, it's small wonder you can't get laid.
3/15/2010 11:04:11 AM
Wasn't there a song from The Roaring Twenties that bemoaned the fact that the rich get richer and the poor get poorer?
Long story short, don't blame the fact that you can't get laid on anyone other than yourself.....
3/15/2010 11:04:28 AM
This guy again? (sigh) " Blah, blah, blah, I hate women, blah, blah blah." Give it a rest you misogynistic dirtbag.
3/15/2010 11:12:48 AM
This is what happens when one is such a loser that women won't talk to him.
This guy is one step away from driving a windowless van known as the rapemobile.
3/15/2010 11:19:20 AM
Wealth disparity starting with the sexual revolution? The rich have been screwing the poor throughout the history of the United States and long before that. Men will screw over each other for more than just competition for women.
And men have been competing with each other for sex since prehistory. It's a simple part of nature. To say that women are causing it because they aren't sexually restrained is just plain stupid.
3/15/2010 11:21:10 AM
Sexists say the Darndest Things? we really need a section like that instead of posting them on the main page.
3/15/2010 11:27:54 AM
I know several strong women who would be happy to separate from more than his wealth - I mean his 'happy' bits. That would put some restraint on him, no doubt. Luckily for him they live on another continent, separated from his by an ocean.
3/15/2010 11:28:20 AM
Sorry - double posting
3/15/2010 11:30:02 AM
Another winner from terrifiedofwomen.com.
I was never this bad.
The wealth disparity in America did increase in the 1980s. May have had something to do with the policies of the Reagan administration.
3/15/2010 11:34:22 AM
Jesus H. Christ I am getting sick of this bullshit. Please pick up a history book fschmidt, it'll do you well.
3/15/2010 11:41:59 AM
@feralboy12 : it's always the same, really. fshmidt is a phenomenon, even by love-shy.com standards.
3/15/2010 11:44:13 AM
Yeah, 'cause wealth was evenly distributed throughout human history up until the 1960's.
3/15/2010 11:46:31 AM
"It is no accident that the wealth disparity in America began increasing immediately after the election of Ronald Reagan and has been steadily increasing since."
3/15/2010 11:52:39 AM
Damn it women, control yourselves! Guys, you can pretty much do whatever you want.
3/15/2010 11:53:37 AM
Correct me if I'm wrong, but didn't the sexual revolution make it easier to find casual sex, not harder?
As women can also have sex because they enjoy it, without the risk of becoming pregnant, they too can now have sex when they want to, and with people they don't want to have a life-long relationship with, but who's nice enough for an evening or a week.
If it's so bad with unrestrained sexuality, let's restrain the sexuality of men, for a change.
3/15/2010 11:55:40 AM
Because things were much more equal during serfdom.
3/15/2010 11:56:28 AM
To be fair to fschmidt he hasn't come up with this bullshit totally on his own. He's got these ideas from a book written in '30s called Sex and Culture. I'd personally be very interested in reading the book to see if it really is as full of shit as it seems.
3/15/2010 11:57:03 AM
Dammit i'll have to adjust the settings on my T.A.R.D.I.S! I've obviously slipped into an alternate dimension.
3/15/2010 12:13:30 PM
This is not fundamentalism. Not all opinions critical of the sexual revolution are fundamentalist. I don't see how someone can look at this and roar with laughter at the lunacy and dogmatism of the speaker. At worst, it's misguided and a little silly, and excessively resentful of women's liberation.
Can we go back to laughing at actual fundamentalists? A good solution might be to start a "misogynists say the darndest things" for those FSTDT-fundamentalists who are a little too interested in telling fschmidt to die in a fire.
3/15/2010 12:31:47 PM
1 2 3