Gay marriage was the idea of far left politicians who needed another victim group to keep their funds and offices in place. I never heard hard working gays say they wanted to be Betty Crocker, it's just the "in your face" losers looking for their share of social service hand outs. In my humble opinion.
51 comments
There are no far left politicians in the US. At least not many enough to get a controversial question like gender-neutral marriage taken on. All you have is an ultra-right-wing and a center-right-wing.
Who wants to be Betty Crocker? I don't even know who she is/was and I still recoil in disgust.
Gay marriage was the idea of far left politicians who needed another victim group to keep their funds and offices in place.
Well if there wasn't a victim in the first place there'd be nothing to "keep their funds and offices in place", so by your logic you and other fundies are keeping 'far left politicians' in business.
I never heard hard working gays say they wanted to be Betty Crocker
And I never heard of any hard working straight people saying they wanted to be Michael Jackson's grandmother. I also don't know what the point of either observation is.
it's just the "in your face" losers looking for their share of social service hand outs.
If by "handouts" you mean the rights that are afforded to all straight married couples then it's not just the openly gay people that want those rights but those that aren't as "in your face" want them as well it's just that they're not as vocal or "in your face" about it. And why SHOULD only straight people get these 'handouts'?
You're right, I don't remember ever wanting to be Betty Crocker, not even a Betty, or a Crocker, or a woman.
Marriage would be pleasant, though.
Your opinion is neither humble nor perceptible.
Also, as a single straight guy, why the hell do you married types get all the benefits?
Wha--HOW does this make any kind of sense?
No, really, what does Betty Crocker have to do with gay people OR marriage? I'm really not seeing it.
Of course, I'm a future female breadwinner whose intended says he'd like to be a stay-at-home-Dad if we can afford it, so Cowboy would probably be furious with me for totally unrelated reasons.
How about, and this will sound completely off the wall, how about they came up with the idea because, oh, I don't know, maybe gay couples actually don't get all the legal rights a heterosexual married couple would.
it's just the "in your face" losers looking for their share of social service hand outs. In my humble opinion.
You mean your uninformed and poorly-thought-out opinion. What social service "handouts"? You mean the same "handouts" you get for marrying someone of the opposite sex? Are you calling all married couples "losers" looking for handouts? Other than a few small tax benefits, there are no social services available to married couples that aren't available to gay singles.
You guys don't have far-left politicians. Hell, here in Canada we're definitely more left-wing than you and our communist and anarchist parties are still very much underground.
As for gay marriage, many of us see it as a human right. Ban it for one group and it's major discrimination. I say marriage for all consenting adults or marriage for none.
Ten bucks says you're on Social Security and whine about keeping the government out of your Medicare like ol' Rush said.
...either that or you're a Brokeback Mountain kinda cowboy. Maybe a Brokeback Mountain kinda cowboy on Social Security and Medicare.
"Betty Crocker....."
You've just proven that your concept of marriage is a 1950s image of a submissive woman waiting on your lazy ass hand and foot, which is not the concept of marriage which is shared by most of the rest of the industrialized world.
And WTF does marriage have to do with social services? For your information, genius, when one is married (without children), one is much less likely to meet the Dickensian government standard for poverty required to get any kind of social services, due to the second income.
If by "humble" you mean, "stupid, uninformed, and random", okay then.
You're welcome to your opinion, even though it's full of shit.
If LGBTs can't have marriage, NOBODY should have marriage.
There will always be other victims, as long as white, heterosexual, Christian males have privileges that no one else does.
Theres nothing "humble" about your "opinion". Fuck off.
Oh and literacy check? the word "Opinion" is not being properly expressed here in your pragraph of nonsense and hatred. No sir, what you are promoting is an ascertation, a "fact" you have convinced yourself of. This is a statement.
If you want it to be an opinion, start it off with "I think", "I believe", or "In my opinion". :D
*pats your head* theres a good stupid! *coos*
First time I decide to visit the site in a long while and I find this shit? I work my fucking ass to the bone serving food to these idiots and they think only 'loser' gays want to marry.I beg to differ. I don't want to be some old fictional christian woman, I just want to be able to marry the guy I love and receive the legal rights that het couples get.
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.