jsonitsacThough six million Jews supposedly died in the gas chambers, not one body has ever been autopsied and found to have died of gas poisoning. We have been shown piles of bodies from World War II, but most of these persons died of typhus or starvation or Allied bombings and a great many of those were murdered Germans, not Jews. Roughly the equivalent of ten football fields should be packed full of gassed bodies to present as evidence, yet not one body has ever been discovered.
Think that has anything to do with the fact that the Nazis cremated their victims?
The Germans documented everything in meticulous detail from shrubbery to arbors, but no pre-war or wartime plans or documents exist that detail or even mention any gas chambers for reasons of genocide. All documents ever presented were drawn up AFTER the war.
We don't have it all, but we have enough. Keep in mind the Germans destroyed a lot of the evidence because they knew that it would be used against them.
Even if we threw away all the evidence and accounted for every so-called gas chamber, it would have taken 68 YEARS to accomplish gassing six million Jews!
They didn't do it one at a time, and not all victims died of gassing. Other means of killing include shooting, working to death, starvation, disease from maltreatment, etc.
Even The Diary of Anne Frank is a hoax. Portions of the diary were written with a ball point pen. These pens were not in use at the time Anne Frank lived.
4/25/2010 8:09:18 PM
Y'know, if they gassed them one at a time it'd have taken that long. Hence why they crammed in as many as they could before turning on the gas.
Fuckin' monsters...I'm proud of my great-uncle for realizing that something was wrong early on and convincing a fellow guard to flee to England with him (with a few of the prisoners they were guarding to boot!)
4/25/2010 8:48:13 PM
but the germans also did a good job of deystroying evidense
4/25/2010 9:18:14 PM
We have the documents. We have the eyewitness accounts. We have the testimonies of the victims who survived. We have the physical evidence carefully and painstakingly documented. We have the forensic evidence.
What you got, loser?
4/25/2010 10:27:09 PM
This load of crap is from the Institute for Historical Review, because that sounds a lot better than the Institute for Hating Jews.
4/25/2010 10:45:10 PM
Holocaust denial is not cool, kid.
4/25/2010 11:03:30 PM
And yet you accept as historical truth something as ludicrous as the bible.
4/26/2010 2:21:24 AM
Yeah, like you believe that. You know fucking well it happened, it gives you a stiffy thinking about it, and you'd love the chance to do it all again, wouldn't you?
4/26/2010 2:58:16 AM
Percy Q. Shunn
Honestly, I just don't know what the fuck is wrong with you people. You ignore and deny historical fact, yet unquestionably believe in invisible sky-fairies.
4/26/2010 3:22:04 AM
"Institute for Historical Revision"
4/26/2010 6:45:45 AM
So, the Nunemberg files were a bad taste joke. Go tell it somewhere else.
4/26/2010 9:32:35 AM
@#1151196 - your uncle deserved a medal!
4/26/2010 12:48:50 PM
But yet, if you could go back in time and kill even more jews than actually died, you'd do it, wouldn't you?
4/26/2010 3:21:43 PM
If you knew anything about this, you'd know that the general consensus is that the gas chambers weren't really employed until very late in the war; the preferred method up till then had been to line them all up in front of trenches and shooting them one by one. And guess what? Those mass graves are still being dug up to this day.
4/26/2010 7:43:15 PM
Dude, I can show you more than a pile of bodies, I can show you film of MOUNTAINS of bodies being pushed into mass pyres.
Just because you can't be spared the 5 seconds it takes to google this doesn't mean there isn't evidence at all.
4/26/2010 10:07:47 PM
Naturally, I'm unsurprised at Anonymous's glaring denial of reality. The site name, Bible Believers, gives me a clue. I recognize that Anonymous is most likely a specialist in believing any old rubbish as long as it is not in fact real and as long as it is blatantly untrue, and that he is a veritable expert in the denial of factual things and ideas.
Once two criteria have been established for Anonymous, i.e. a thing's or idea's unreality and untruthfulness, he feels it is safe to commit himself to wholeheartedly espousing its validity and giving it his full support, whilst, at the same time, offering up his denial of its exact opposite, i.e. a thing's or idea's reality and truthfulness.
4/27/2010 10:34:44 AM
"..no pre-war or wartime plans or documents exist that detail or even mention any gas chambers for reasons of genocide."
Bullshit. There are, in fact, plans/blueprints of the chambers in the Auschwitz archives, along with letters from officials ordering sealed, airtight doors which would allow the chambers to be observed from the outside.
There is also evidence there of the cover-up of the gas chambers by the Nazis, in the form of a memo on which a commander made a margin notation reprimanding another official for mentioning the gas chambers in the memo, rather than using the coded references to them that he was supposed to use. They also destroyed many of their own records when they knew the allies were on their way and would soon discover their war crimes. The lack of written reference to gas chambers in Nazi records was deliberate.
4/27/2010 2:01:03 PM
"not one body has ever been autopsied and found to have died of gas poisoning"
After gassing, the bodies were sent to crematoriums and burned up, or burned in large pits (we have it on film).
Even if there had been remains of people who were gassed which were still composed enough for autopsy at the time of liberation, they would not have been autopsied because the evidence was clear at the time---The chambers, the gas cans, hundreds of thousands of eyewitnesses, etc. They didn't have racist idiots standing in the middle of piles of cans of Zyklon B claiming that no gassing had occurred.
And if you still don't want to believe it, how about the film footage we have showing Nazis shooting the naked Jews, who then fall into the huge mass grave pits?
Or the footage of the prisoners starved to mere bones, while the food parcels sent to them by the Red Cross were kept locked away in storehouses at the camps?
I supposed that's not genocide either, right?
4/27/2010 2:18:56 PM
An odious site that goes on to sing the praises of David Irving - no surprise there I suppose.
It is however, if you can stomach it, full of stuff like
'Many have said to us: "What difference does it make? The truth of the Holocaust is of no concern to Christians." Nonsense! A Christian is not free to believe and promote a lie about any person or nation. A Christian is guided by truth and facts, not emotions and majority opinion.'
4/27/2010 5:46:07 PM
Even if you discount for whatever reason that the concentration camps didn't exist, you're STILL left with the hundreds of thousands of Jews that were massacred by the Einsantzgruppen squads sent into eastern Europe as the war began. As with the concentration camps, they wrote meticulous logs of the "quota" of people they killed such as the Jager report. We also have records from the Wannsee Conference, which first laid out the plan to exterminate the "undesirables".
So yeah, you fail on all counts
4/27/2010 7:58:07 PM
"many of those were murdered Germans, not Jews"
There were no german jews?
4/28/2010 12:46:28 AM
Eyewitness testimony from survivors,
Testimony from the perpetrators,
Contempory ENIGMA intercepts,
Contempory arial photographs,
Written reports from the SonderKommando who worked inside the chambers and were subsequently, themselves, murdered,
Soil analysis of the sites,
Forensic analysis of the sites,
Demographic analysis of pre and post war populations,
and the accumulated evidence from over 2,000 seperate war crime trials held in over 25 different countries over the last 66 years.
You've got ??
4/28/2010 1:11:11 AM
Seriously, it should be a flogging offense to be too fucking lazy to look something up on Wikipedia.
4/28/2010 7:57:29 PM
What Anonymous says can be safely discounted as bullshit, as he is probably a Bible Believer. We know the Bible is full of bullshit, it's a proven fact, therefore, its believers are full of bullshit.
We know that fundies are prone to be badly behaved savages who like to pretend that the Nazis were lovely, warm and kind people who would never hurt a fly, let alone a Jew. Even if the Nazis were nasty, then they were probably only following God's example, this is according to fundie right wing logic.
Can we assume that Anonymous is a Nazi ball-licker?
4/29/2010 4:19:09 AM
Like most of its fellow empires, the german third empire (reich) exploited conquered slave labour.
That these slaves died in droves from overwork, overcrowding, lack of sanitation, and malnutrition, is well documented.
That guards and overseers frequently abused the very slaves they were exploiting, is also well documented.
That Hitler maintained a deliberate policy of depopulation of occupied Russia, is also well documented.
4/29/2010 9:10:00 AM