First off, homosexuals CAN reproduce, just not with a same-sex partner. Secondly what about couples who choose not to have kids, infertile couples, or couples past child-bearing age? Are you saying that they should not have any rights either? You, sir, are an idiot. Please die in a fire.
12/31/2006 10:12:18 PM
Why should I give any rights to your grandmother? Or (hypothetical, smarty) infertile cousin?
12/31/2006 10:46:27 PM
I'll cut your nuts off, then you'll have no rights. And, of course, that means I'll have done nothing wrong, because you don't matter.
12/31/2006 10:53:11 PM
Are homosexuals a species now?
2/5/2007 3:14:45 PM
Well, let's all go shoot the Down's Syndrome kids now. Genetic mutation, no rights.
2/5/2007 3:39:30 PM
Civil rights are now parcelled out based on ability to reproduce?
That's it, take away the vote from post-menopausal women. After all, how can they be seen to be aiding the survival of the species, given that they can't breed?
2/5/2007 4:13:01 PM
lol, I expect that your preacher is one of those who practice celibacy(while secretly buying the service of whore, abusing their choir boys, etc) and therefore not have any rights. I mean, obviously those who CHOSE not to propogate are even more defective then homosexuals right?
10/15/2007 1:14:34 AM
Why should any rights be granted us? I'm single, childless, and make an almost 6-figure income. I'm paying 17 times the income taxes you are, you witless tard. For that kind of money you bet your fascist ass I want my rights.
10/15/2007 1:37:58 AM
My parents adopted me because they're infertile. How did they get away with voting all these decades?
10/15/2007 3:17:17 AM
old people and young children cannot reproduce. people with downs syndrom cannot reproduce. people with reproductive disorders cannot reproduce. heck, why would we give them any rights? kill them off and throw 'em out with the trash!
...or were you just using inability to reproduce as an excuse for you bigotry?
2/13/2008 5:24:20 PM
Adolf would be proud of you.
2/13/2008 6:37:49 PM
barren women, sterile men, unchilded marrieds, celibate by choice religios and others. None of these add any more than many gay men, and less than some lesbians (both of these groups being able to and often do reproduce).
As far as wider value is concerned: the "unencumbered" often contribute more than they take out.
2/14/2008 2:42:38 PM
"Homosexuals assert that they are 'born' homosexual. If true, this is obviously some sort of defective genetic mutation..."
Something can be biological without being genetic. If it was 100% genetic we would not see the birth-order patterns.
"Further, since homosexuals, by nature, cannot reproduce,"
"which aids in the survival of the species, why should any rights be granted them period?"
First, equal rights are not special rights.
2nd, sisters of male homosexuals have more children. Why, we don't know, but it could be that the same biological predilections that predispose a male child to homosexuality may make their sisters either highly fertile or highly (hetero)sexual.
2/14/2008 3:14:42 PM
but babies cant have babies, so we should kill them and then the race will die out. pwned by your own logic
6/8/2008 7:12:56 PM
It has been speculated that gay men provided a "surplus" that didn't want to own a woman, or have direct loyalty to the children. They were more likely to fight and provide for everyone.
The point is, if it's genetic it hasn't been bred out - so there must be some survival feature.
Oh and the taxes I pay for schools, nurseries, obstetrics must be worth something, and definitely more than I'll take in my declining years
6/8/2008 8:52:29 PM
So, I guess we shouldn't give any rights to infertile couples or post-menopausal women, then. And that includes the right to be taxed, if they're not going to be counted as citizens any longer! Moron.
6/9/2008 2:10:55 PM
This was starting to make a little sense until that last little clause on the end. I'll assume you said "How can the gay gene reproduce" instead, just to make things logical. And the logical answer is that it's not caused by a gene, but perhaps a combination of genes that were present in the mother and father.
Also, through this, shouldn't you admit that you're not against gay adoption, since children can't "catch the gay"? Right?
7/16/2008 5:15:18 AM
Mmm... I can just feel the christian love!
7/16/2008 6:38:12 AM
@JasoNF - I've just picked up on your post.
it suggests that along with the male partner, the gay brother is likely to be an extra protector and food provider, thus enabling the sister to bring more children to term and raise them better.
Makes good genetic and evoltuionary sense. A queer win here! xx
7/16/2008 7:22:17 AM
Homophobic christian fanatics assert that they do and encourage horrible acts on those with differing sexual orientations because 'God commands them to'. If true, this is obviously some sort of schizophrenic mental disorder... Further, since such anti-gay fanatics like Furyus George, by nature, simply vouch for violent authoritarian regimes, which aid in the destruction of our free nation, why should they not be shipped off to countries like North Korea that share their values and be gunned or gassed to death?
Just a thought. J
1/14/2010 12:45:05 PM
But I'm sure this simian thinks his rights are sacrosanct!
Try to do unto him what he cavalierly asserts should be done unto those he hates, and he'd be screeching and flinging poo in no time.
If you refer to a cartoon monkey in your username, expect these jokes. And thanks for shitting all over one of my few good childhood memories, you bigoted asshole.
Parenthetically, do fundies have any other emotions besides hate and smug self-righteousness? It doesn't seem so...
1/8/2013 11:17:32 AM
Fundies LOVE the word "assert". They use it all the time to cover up the fact that everything they believe in is unproven and completely without supporting evidence.
1/8/2013 4:24:00 PM
Eugenics and/or genocide for Jebus!
1/8/2013 6:37:53 PM