I think you've got it about right.
No planes were used because it would cause too many loose ends.. the security perimeter/ anti-video devices, and approach from the South for the second strike would guarantee, or minimize potential for someone just filming an explosion blowing out.
What would you do if the 'hijacker', or remote controlled plane missed/ something went wrong? Then you'd have a building full of explosives and a lot of investigators coming around. No real planes= way fewer loose ends (except for the people you employed to create the images, which are a big loose end). Less real family members= less people really looking into how their loved one died/ less people potentially not signing the lump sum payout.
Other benefits of using CGI instead of planes: you can make it more dramatic- a real hollywood blockbuster.- Where a real plane maybe would have logged itself halfway in the bulding, with chunks of tailsection/ cabin falling down the side of the tower, never creating the illusion of really damaging the support structure.
This would also run the risk of dislodging/ upsetting the connections the strategically placed explosives (although, I have a feeling directed energy was also used, case in point missing engine blocks/ door handles/ oxydation but no other damage from cars blocks and blocks away, but I digress).
The thing is, I don't get how people can realize the second plane was flying faster than is physically possible for a Boeing at sea-level, yet act like this isn't an issue... pisses me off a little bit.
Kentrailer, September Clues 31 Comments
[7/18/2010 1:38:33 PM]
Fundie Index: 25
Submitted By: Space Helicopter
Well he's halfway to seeing that planes + demo explosives wouldn't work; but then he goes off into this
ridiculous stupid special effects fest. If Kentrailer ever starts writing Dan Brown had better look to his laurels
7/18/2010 1:47:28 PM
Okay, and for the people who actually saw the planes in-person?
7/18/2010 2:45:10 PM
7/18/2010 3:45:22 PM
The next step is to start working in the epicycles.
7/18/2010 4:17:13 PM
The Festival Arc Defense
7/18/2010 5:57:45 PM
So the government has technology to create perfectly realistic holograms of airplanes crashing into buildings... and yet we don't have real Yu-Gi-Oh Duel Disks yet?!
What kind of priorities do these science people have?!
7/18/2010 8:16:04 PM
This is the most ridiculous plan i have ever heard.
7/18/2010 9:31:10 PM
I don't get how people like this can realise that there must have been planes because people fucking saw them with their own eyes and yet they continue to squirm around the issue and belittle the death of hundreds and grief of thousands by continuing to deny there were any aeroplanes...pisses me off a little bit.
7/18/2010 10:50:11 PM
This would be better with giant pterodactyls instead of planes. What about fire-breathing dragons? I like dragons.
7/18/2010 11:33:13 PM
Holy fuck, someone get a 2x4 and start beating some sense into the "truthers" already! DO SOME BASIC FUCKING RESEARCH!
7/19/2010 1:23:34 AM
Percy Q. Shunn
Reynolds Wrap called. Your new hat is ready.
7/19/2010 5:10:57 AM
These 9/11 Truthers are starting to make the Young Earth Creationists sound sensible by comparison.
7/19/2010 10:48:37 AM
Ok, so where are the hundreds of people that were on the 4 planes? Who made all the cell phone calls?
7/19/2010 10:58:15 AM
You're completely out of your mind.
7/19/2010 12:35:12 PM
Wait, we can generate holographic images now? Why has this not been sold to the public for huge profits yet?
7/19/2010 1:49:42 PM
I cannot believe the sheer mind-numbingly ridiculous levels of brain dead stupidity evident in this post.
It's FEWER real family members, not 'less'!
Oh, and your conspiracy theory's a load of bullshit too.
7/19/2010 3:01:47 PM
Aircraft shaped farts. Yes, that's it, aircraft shaped farts took down the World Trade Center in New York.
7/19/2010 6:36:08 PM
I think I caught somewhere in there something about not having to deal with real families.
Are you actually denying that there were real people on planes hitting the towers? I can sit you down with the relatives of the dead, then you can explain how exactly "they never actually died".
Out of all the shit to try for the one part of 9/11 you choose not to believe is the actual planes? Really? you don't believe there were planes?
7/19/2010 10:03:21 PM
Percy Q. Shunn
I want one of them hologram thingys. I'm gonna set it up at work so my boss thinks I'm there, while I'm actually at home masturbating to September Clues.
7/20/2010 4:42:27 AM
Industrial Light and Magic did it!
7/20/2010 5:25:34 AM
"It's ALL CG..." *Facepalm*
7/20/2010 10:38:26 AM
And the buildings didn't actually collapse either. They just photoshopped them out.
7/20/2010 2:39:11 PM
You win the Internet!
I once had an argument on Youtube with some guy who maintained that the planes that "allegedly" flew into the WTC that day are still in service! I told him to look up the Civil aircraft register and check the registrations (N numbers) of the planes. He went silent. It's just one thin hairbrained theory after another with these guys.
7/20/2010 3:20:40 PM
Less real family members= less people really looking into how their loved one died/ less people potentially not signing the lump sum payout.
Except that there are a bunch of family members of people on board those aircraft, a fact which you completely ignore.
Other benefits of using CGI instead of planes: you can make it more dramatic- a real hollywood blockbuster.
Except for the fact that there were hundreds of eyewitnesses who saw firsthand the second aircraft hit the other tower since they were looking up after the first strike.
Where a real plane maybe would have logged itself halfway in the bulding, with chunks of tailsection/ cabin falling down the side of the tower
You really think a 767 traveling at 500 MPH is going to just lodge in the side of the building? You misunderstand physics.
I have a feeling directed energy was also used
It was, in the form of aircraft piloted by Islamic extremists into buildings.
case in point missing engine blocks/ door handles/ oxydation but no other damage from cars blocks and blocks away
All I can say is a big WTF are you talking about?
The thing is, I don't get how people can realize the second plane was flying faster than is physically possible for a Boeing at sea-level
So what's more believable, that numerous Muslim terrorists hijacked airliners & flew them into buildings, or some secret arm of the government sneaked into the WTC, set up all sorts of remote-controlled explosive devices, developed CGI and hologram technology to make fake aircraft, and then developed some kind of energy weapon powerful enough to bring down 110 story buildings?
7/20/2010 7:17:54 PM
The reason the speed of the second plane is not an issue is because it was in fact flying at a normal speed and is therefore not an issue....get it?
The rest of your post is even more stupid, and downright offensive. If there has ever been one event in history where what we saw was EXACTLY what was happening, 9/11 was it.
Sick cunt, though I guess his user name may give us a clue as to where he lives and, well, say no more.
7/21/2010 2:35:06 AM