drf333 #fundie

drf333 #fundie bbc.co.uk

There the many creationists web sites with supporting evidence, but you will not believe them. However have a look at all the tests that are carried out by evolutionists and you will see ( if you are honest) that all their tests showsl that flies do not change into anything else but flies such like. You would have thought they would have been able to prove the theory by now, but they have not

58 comments

old comment by Horsefeathers

"There the many creationists web sites with supporting evidence, but you will not believe them."

Evidence is not made up on the spot. Hence the reason I and others don't believe such sites.

"However have a look at all the tests that are carried out by evolutionists and you will see ( if you are honest) that all their tests showsl that flies do not change into anything else but flies such like."

Certainly they do. Eventually. Unless they happen to be evolutionary dead-ends. Just because it doesn't happen within your lifetime doesn't mean it doesn't happen.

"You would have thought they would have been able to prove the theory by now, but they have not"

Theories are not "proved." Theories are supported. With evidence. Real evidence. Try reading some of it. It's not like they hide the stuff.

old comment by Papabear

"There the many creationists web sites with supporting evidence,"

Uh, no. There are many creationist web sites claiming to have supporting evidence, but all they show is Bible stories and wishful thinking.

"but you will not believe them."

I would if the there was an iota of actual, verifiable evidence supporting creationism.

So, if I don't believe your fairy tale I'm dishonest? Plus, there are reams of evidence showing that lifeforms evolved from other lifeforms.

"You would have thought they would have been able to prove the theory by now, but they have not"

Complete and utter proof as to the details of every step of evolution is not possible, but proof that evolution happened and continues to happen is overwhelming. Proof of the Bible stories of creation is utterly non-existant.

The main problem here is that you wouldn't know credible evidence from a fairy tale if it wore a sign and introduced itself.

old comment by

You guys don't even know what evolution is, yet you feel all big and clever when you "debunk" it with comments such as "flies do not change into anything else but flies such like". No, they don't turn into anything else but flies. But importantly, they are significantly different flies. Significant differences pile up, so that gradually, by tiny increments and almost imperceptibly except over (usually) large time frames a family of organisms becomes different from its ancestors. You haven't read anything about evolution - or if you have you certainly haven't understood it - otherwise you wouldn't make such an utterly asinine statement, and your brother-in-idiocy I Am A Creationist wouldn't have come here with smart arse statements about attacking your "good point".

old comment by Giveitaday

There the many creationists web sites with supporting evidence

Much of this so-called "supporting evidence" is the same tired creationist claims that keeps being trotted out even though it has been debunked time and time and time again.

However have a look at all the tests that are carried out by evolutionists and you will see ( if you are honest) that all their tests showsl that flies do not change into anything else but flies such like

Your understanding of evolutionary theory is flawed, likely because you have never bothered to learn anything about what it does and does not caim and instead just blindly accepted the creationist strawman version of evolution.

You would have thought they would have been able to prove the theory by now, but they have not

You obviously don't know the first thing about how science works, and yet you think you are qualified to comment on it as if you did know what you were talkng about.

old comment by Neith

@Creationist

Organism: You are an organism. One tree is an organism. One fly is an organism.

Species: Humans are one species. Drosophila simulans (one species of fruit fly) is another species.

One organism does not start off as one species and then transform into another. Larva turns into flies, and caterpillars turn into butterflies, but that is metamorphosis, not speciation.

Further, an organism of one species does not give birth to an organism of a different species. A housefly will not give birth to a fruit fly, and an ape will not give birth to a human.

Do you agree with me so far? Good! Because so does evolutionary theory.

Try to forget everything you've ever read on creationist websites, and read this:
http://whenpigsfly-returns.blogspot.com/2007/10/evolution-for-dummies.html

old comment by Anon-e-moose

"There the many creationists web sites with supporting evidence, but you will not believe them."

Kent Hovind's and Ray Comfort's are proof that 'Creationist' sites have no right to be acknowledged, never mind believed. And Kitzmiller versus Dover proved that 'Creationism' (via the so-called 'evidence' for 'Intelligent Design' submitted in court by Michael Behe) never had any credibility to start with, therefore more reason why it has no right to be believed.

Tests conducted in labs with fruit flies proves otherwise.

"You would have thought they would have been able to prove the theory by now, but they have not"

Said lab tests, coupled with the shitloads of evidence found, researched and collated post-Darwin, proves the Theory of Evolution is no longer a mere 'theory'. It's fact.

This is the current location of drf333 and his Creationist ilk:

image

They're also in a river in Paris.

old comment by Angua

Really? When flies reproduce their children are also flies? Wow! That's unbelievable! Who would ever think that the offspring of flies would be other flies? I mean, that's like the offspring of people being other people! Wouldn't the evilutionists be blown out of the water to know that their parents were human beings as well. That would destroy their theory completely.

The fact that scientists have managed to observed speciation amongst flies means absolutely nothing because it was only another species of flies. Why are the evilutionists attempting to hide this fact? If evilution were true we'd expect flies to give birth to giraffes! But what flies give birth to we never actually consider giraffes. The descendants of flies will always be flies. After all, humans never stopped being apes and that apes never stopped being mammals and that mammals never stopped being vertebrates. Why do evilutionists try to hide this fact? Why do evilutionists try so hard to hide this truth from us? We must fight the evil satanic evilutionist conspiracy and stop falling for their ignorant lies and propaganda!

drf333 #fundie bbc.co.uk

58 comments

Confused?