I made my last statement based on historical deduction
What good is historical deduction when you ignore things that don't fit you preconceived conclusion?
Back in 1787when the Constitution became official, the Christians of the day far out numbered the non-christians (Jews, Muslim, Hindu, Atheists, ect).
So? The constitution gurantees Freedom of Religion, not freedom of christianity or christian denominations. This was stated clearly and in no uncertain terms in the 1799 Treaty of Tripoli which was approved unanimously by a senate which contained many of the founders.
From this fact, I deduced that our Founding Fathers were not concerned with non-christian religions but more so the freedom of christian denomination.
Thats not a deduction, it's an assumption. You didn;t deduce that from the constitution, you assumed that it meant only christianity without so much as a shred of evidence.
My original statement is that America was BUILT on Christian Freedom clearly refers to the beliefs of our Great Founding Fathers.
So how do you plan on getting around the fact that not all the founding fathers were christians? Some were openly skeptical of organized religion, others were openly deists, and there is adequate evidence that shows a few were agnostic if not outright atheists.
Moreover, many parts of the basic articles and the bill of rights are antithetical to, and indeed in outright opposition of biblical and/or church law. The fact that the US Constitution did not claim a divine right or enshrine a state religion was made it such a revolutionary document at the time it was written.
The Founders were not naive or ignorant to the existence of other religions, had they only freedom of christian denomination they would made that intention clear in the constitution, and certainly not state the exact opposite just a scant decade later in a treaty that carries the force of law.