Home Archives Random Quotes Latest Comments Top 100 Submit Quote Search Log In Forums

Quote# 75670

"Just to set things straight:

Banning sex is NOT sinful, banning reproduction however IS. God wants us to reproduce and raise families, it's our lot in life. If anything, the removal of taboos placed on sexuality will cause a downward slide in reproduction. As sex is progressively viewed as a recreational activity, pressure to make anti-conceptive methods more effective builds up, sex becomes more common but reproduction becomes scarce. The solution would be to ban sex entirely whilst making methods of artificial insemination mandatory.

It's not a question of HOW we reproduce but IF. I don't think God would shed many tears if we replaced a primitive and sensual method of reproduction with something more civilized and modest. It's the same concept behind why we rarely create fire by rubbing two sticks together anymore, just with more moral reasoning."

Whathastobedone, Theology Online 72 Comments [8/30/2010 6:37:21 PM]
Fundie Index: 80
Submitted By: Skavau
WTF?! || meh
Username:
Comment:



1 2 3
#1199994
shykid

"Banning sex is NOT sinful, banning reproduction however IS."

How does this even begin to make sense? Only allow reproduction through in-vitro fertilization or other artificial means? Outlaw all intercourse except procreative missionary-position sex between a married couple?

Yeah, OK, good luck passing and enforcing that, sparky.

Whathastobedone seems to have mistaken "Theology Online" with "Theocracy Online".

8/30/2010 10:28:47 AM
#1200182
Kitourahime

I...d...j......I don't even....what? D=

8/30/2010 6:35:59 PM
#1200189
WMDKitty

You. Are. An. Idiot.

8/30/2010 6:49:01 PM
#1200192
Nowonmai

George Orwell's "1984" has all this anti-sex rhetoric in it too. I'm sure you would be happen with a woman or man just laying there saying "doing our duty", but not for me!

8/30/2010 6:51:39 PM
#1200193
nutcase

"Banning sex is NOT sinful, banning reproduction however IS."

Biology fail.

8/30/2010 6:54:39 PM
#1200197
LDM

Go ahead, pass that one on to your congressman. Even the most conservative ones would laugh in your face.

8/30/2010 6:59:07 PM
#1200199
nichevo

So, if reproduction was guaranteed by some sort of futuristic and self-sustaining birthing factory, would all sorts of kinky sex be allowed?

Somehow I doubt concern for reproduction is the underlying cause for objection here.

8/30/2010 7:02:21 PM
#1200200
Isa

...Am I the only one who thinks that this guy used "1984" as an instruction manual rather than a warning?

8/30/2010 7:06:42 PM
#1200203
Blasphemina

Turkey basters all around!

8/30/2010 7:10:17 PM
#1200209
Allegory for Jesus

Moral reasoning? Pfft. When you start with the premise "God wants...," you give up all rights to use the word "reason".

8/30/2010 7:17:33 PM
#1200210
LM

Not 1984 guys, Brave New World.

8/30/2010 7:17:51 PM
#1200212
Evilution Teacher

"downward slide in reproduction" giggle giggle giggle; oh he/she didn't mean THAT kind of downward slide?

And as a woman who enjoys sex AND is trying to get pregnant; I disprove your theory.

@ Blasphemina: LOL

Edit: Visited original post - here is original poster's "slogan" for his/her profile

"Slogan/motto:
Every problem in the world is caused by the fact that someone, somewhere isn't a Christian. - Me"

WOW.

8/30/2010 7:20:58 PM
#1200215
Man Called True

@ LM:

Not really. Brave New World had nonreproductive sex as a social requirement.

8/30/2010 7:30:34 PM
#1200220
Musicalbookworm

Ah, someone finally explained the anti-choice agenda clearly and honestly.

8/30/2010 7:37:00 PM
#1200221
misshani

"The solution would be to ban sex entirely whilst making methods of artificial insemination mandatory."

You mean like they do to cows in factory farms? A lifetime imprisoned in a cage, enslaved to perpetual pregnancy? Will they be slaughtered when they are no longer "productive" enough?

Of course it's not this guy's fault if it just happens to only enslave the female half of the population. He can just gleefully point to his ego-projection imaginary friend and say it's his plan.

(Yeah, I'm assuming the OP is a guy. This could only come from the mind of a perfect candidate for LoveShy.)

8/30/2010 7:38:32 PM
#1200222
The L

This reminds me of Sulva from That Hideous Strength, coupled with the societies from The Giver and 1984.

That is NOT a good combination.

8/30/2010 7:38:46 PM
#1200228
Brenz

So...you want to be like Krypton, then? God destroyed them because they didn't fuck passionately enough. Look it up. It's in the Superman Bible.

8/30/2010 7:47:45 PM
#1200229


You just don't get it. God WANTS us to have crazy wild out of control sex.
Why else would he make it feel so good?

8/30/2010 7:48:08 PM
#1200260
dionysus

Wow, I feel sorry for your girlfriend/wife, if you have one; which, if you do, won't be for very long. Actually, I feel sorry for you too as you'll be missing out on one of the best experiences in life because of dogma.

8/30/2010 8:25:43 PM
#1200265
Alencon

Huh? WTF? Now they want to ban sex? Take your "civilized and modest" and shove it.

8/30/2010 8:40:20 PM
#1200275
pmhilton@myfairpoint.net

People like you give stupid a bad name.

8/30/2010 8:49:49 PM
#1200285
Canadia

Must....stop....fun...pleasure....

8/30/2010 9:06:35 PM
#1200296
GodotIsWaiting4U

WOW. I've been saying for years that you people hate sex, but I thought I was just using hyperbole. You people ACTUALLY HATE SEX.

8/30/2010 9:41:08 PM
#1200319
aaa

You are fucking crazy. If you banned sex, the people would revolt in the most violent possible manner.

8/30/2010 10:49:05 PM
#1200331
the old firm

"Banning sex is NOT sinful..." Yeah, because repressing sexual urges does work soooo well.

8/30/2010 11:20:16 PM
1 2 3