Home Archives Random Quotes Latest Comments Top 100 Submit Quote Search Log In

Quote# 75670

"Just to set things straight:

Banning sex is NOT sinful, banning reproduction however IS. God wants us to reproduce and raise families, it's our lot in life. If anything, the removal of taboos placed on sexuality will cause a downward slide in reproduction. As sex is progressively viewed as a recreational activity, pressure to make anti-conceptive methods more effective builds up, sex becomes more common but reproduction becomes scarce. The solution would be to ban sex entirely whilst making methods of artificial insemination mandatory.

It's not a question of HOW we reproduce but IF. I don't think God would shed many tears if we replaced a primitive and sensual method of reproduction with something more civilized and modest. It's the same concept behind why we rarely create fire by rubbing two sticks together anymore, just with more moral reasoning."

Whathastobedone, Theology Online 72 Comments [8/30/2010 6:37:21 PM]
Fundie Index: 83
Submitted By: Skavau
WTF?! || meh
Username:
Comment:



1 2 3


I thought that we don’t create fire by rubbing sticks because it’s just easier to use a match. As opposed to, y’know all the extra hullabaloo requried for artificial insemination.

Say, wait a minute. How do you get the semen for the artificial insemination? Does this mean masturbation is still on the table?

8/31/2010 9:27:42 AM

ND

Troll

8/31/2010 10:43:07 AM

ATEX

This guy just needs to get laid

8/31/2010 12:35:53 PM

Godbuster

Yes yes and we are also supposed to be working long hours for minimal pay to appease our feudal lords.
I can actually hear people like you screaming:

"PLEASE control and dominate me oh mighty powerful unerring rich people. Impose your beliefs on me that you yourself don't practice. I will blindly swallow every piece of propaganda you throw at me."

8/31/2010 12:45:01 PM

Old Viking

I'll have to think this one over and get back to you.

8/31/2010 1:31:48 PM

Berny

You are certifiably insane, not to mention your doctrine would fly in the face of the Catholic church, which abhors anything artificial dealing with human reproduction.
Sex is recreation, and it is healthy. Your attitude, on the other hand, is repressive and wrong.
EDIT: I just had a look at the thread. This is either a troll, or one sick motherfucker.

8/31/2010 1:47:33 PM

blayzekohime

No. God ordered you to 'multiply and FILL the Earth', not overflow it. The implication is that once it is filled, you can stop reproducing.

8/31/2010 1:53:56 PM

Shanya Almafeta

So you're postulating some sort of future technology where we can have all the sex we want but only have children at times we choose and plan for?

Sounds great to me. I wonder what these futuristic technologies that allows sex to be fun and safe while delaying pregnancy until a more suitable time could be called...? Truly, such anti-procreation barriers or medication, should they come about some day in the far future, would be a miraculous step forwards for our culture.

8/31/2010 3:22:13 PM

The Lazy One

Actually, if you think about it, sex isn't efficient. By creating zygotes in petri dishes and then implanting them in women we could make babies a lot more efficiently.

Of course, good luck getting anyone to agree to that.

8/31/2010 3:34:30 PM

Masker

Apart from being flat-out nuts, this guy got its dogmas all wrong.

Go read the Screwtape Letters and The Song of Songs. Pleasure is a good thing. Sex is a good thing. Just because you have issues against it, does not means that God does. God made it like that for a reason.

What's with fundies and saying good things are sinful because they are pleasurable? They are good things, to be enjoyed.

Like Hell that it most "civilized". If anything, striping good things in life for the sake of efficiency (and not even that, since artificial insemination is more complicated than the natural way)is barbaric.

So, to make it short: Go to Hell.

8/31/2010 3:46:49 PM



Misanthropy for Jesus!

8/31/2010 3:58:36 PM

Deadasfak

Someone should have sex with him/her.

8/31/2010 4:40:27 PM

I read about the afterlife

Artifical insemination!?!?!?! SOMEONE'S PLAYING GOD!!!!!! OH NOEZ!!!!!

8/31/2010 7:45:07 PM

Amadaun

You have proper sentences and no serious internal discrepancies. You also don't appear to strenuously hate any particular group of people. You are clearly on the upper side of this database.

The problem is, you're myopic and crazy, and while your preoccupation with what-is-sinful is internally consistent and all, it makes no allowance for 'reality' or 'other people having the right to opinions.'

8/31/2010 8:40:32 PM

Evil Pirate Captain Mel

In some cases, reproduction SHOULD be banned. Just seeing pictures of the extensive Duggar family makes me want to rip out my ovaries with my bare hands.

8/31/2010 11:39:06 PM

zaatheist

Too well written for the usual crazed fundie. I smell POE.

9/1/2010 10:36:21 AM

Chatvert

Shades of The Handmaid's Tale, really. And possibly beyond shades...crikey.

9/3/2010 9:30:39 PM



If sex is banned, unless you use artificial insemmination or in vitro, condemned by religion too, reproduction is banned as well. Care to solve the riddle?

9/7/2010 10:00:25 AM



Actually, if there are methods of artificial insemmination, since sex is a natural instinct, I think it would be used, much more than now, with that finality. Have you thought that?. And man, hasn't your reasoning led to actually questioning God's way of making us reproduce?

9/7/2010 10:03:44 AM

Zzy

I'd say this guy is full of it, but...Japan. Few sexual taboos, declining population.

11/24/2010 1:34:33 PM

PiGirl13

Imagine Whathastobedone actually trying to campaign for this law.

Even worse, imagine the government trying to enforce it. (And failing epically, as would inevitably happen.)

1/5/2011 2:28:38 PM

Neus

This is, of course, throwing out that fact that plenty of people want kids sooner or later in their lives.

4/19/2011 6:29:58 PM
1 2 3