1 2 3 4
#1199915
Berny
You are a fucking moron if you think that you just postulated a valid argument.
You have the belief god exists, that makes you a theist. We have the belief no god exits, thus we are atheists.
Get yourself a fucking dictionary (as well as a clue).
8/30/2010 7:40:09 AM
#1199920
buff114
can I get a facepalm brothers!!!! AMEN!!!
8/30/2010 7:47:47 AM
#1199927
Amanda
Anti-rock people don't believe that there is no such thing as rock music. I'm not against there being a god, I just see no evidence that one exists.
8/30/2010 7:59:54 AM
#1199929
Apocraphy
You is a extremely idiyoot
8/30/2010 8:02:24 AM
#1199930
Prager
Halo is about 8 years old, right?
8/30/2010 8:06:00 AM
#1199936
GodotIsWaiting4U
We are not "against" there being a god anymore than we are "against" there being unicorns. We simply see no evidence. We are not necessarily anti-god either, and being against something does not prove the something in question.
Also, holographic imaging does work. It's just ludicrously expensive and inefficient right now.
8/30/2010 8:22:47 AM
#1199937
Thinking Allowed
8/30/2010 8:25:31 AM
#1199939
HazelHolly
No, atheism does not prove God. Atheists believe that there is no God. Were there conclusive proof of any given God, they'd probably convert to the religion of that God.
8/30/2010 8:29:42 AM
#1199943
freako104
So now all my gods exist because atheists, Muslims, Jews, other Pagans and Christians don't believe in them. This is using your logic
8/30/2010 8:39:17 AM
#1199944
nutbunny
Like how I am anti:
-Malfoy
-Klingon high art
-ugly, robot-looking Cylons
8/30/2010 8:42:43 AM
#1199945
caustic gnostic
Not only is there no evidence for a magical entity in the sky, there is no need for such an entity to exist.
8/30/2010 8:45:59 AM
#1199949
im not "against" there being a god, there ISNT one...
if there WAS, then there would be a single scrap of evidence, which there is not...
if the Abrahamic god was proven beyond any doubt to exist though, id be its enemy since its evil.
if the devil existed, it couldnt possibly be THAT bad, since its the enemy of the evil god.
8/30/2010 9:02:01 AM
#1199952
im not "against" there being a god, there ISNT one...
if there WAS, then there would be a single scrap of evidence, which there is not...
8/30/2010 9:03:51 AM
#1199956
He's not a fundamentalist, just really stupid.
8/30/2010 9:15:49 AM
#1199957
Sisyphus
Well I'm sold! Gonna start worshipping ASAP. Sheesh there goes my social calendar. I'll barely have time to eat and sleep by the time I'm done worshipping the thousands of gods who I formerly didn't believe in.
8/30/2010 9:24:43 AM
#1199958
Are you anti(insert here whatever comes to your mind)?. Most probably YES.
8/30/2010 9:27:26 AM
#1199986
I think Halo is a pretty cool guy. He makes stupid arguments and doesn't afraid of anything.
8/30/2010 10:16:27 AM
#1199988
wut
8/30/2010 10:18:44 AM
#1199993
Godbuster
Do you believe you're stupid?
- No.
Well by believing that you are not stupid you must actually hate being stupid, meaning you really are stupid, so you're just denying your stupidity.
- WAAAH!
8/30/2010 10:27:56 AM
#1199995
...there are no anti (lets say) holograph people because there is none.
Well, I believe in the Emergency Medical Hologram on the spaceship Voyager, so you lose extremely. Or something.
*this was by Sasha*
8/30/2010 10:47:45 AM
#1199997
Amadaun
Personally, I'm against the development of sentient tactile holographs because they pose a civil rights question even more filled with ontological pitfalls than the one around robots. Although it's really the same AI question. Maybe I just hate the stupidity of 'tactile holographs?'
I'm all for unicorns.
Neither of these positions affects the reality of their objects in ANY WAY.
8/30/2010 10:55:37 AM
#1199998
Nicholae Carpathia
I, for one, am anti-nothing.
I believe we should strive against entropy with all the force and magic and so on at our command, to stave off the heat-death of the universe.
8/30/2010 10:56:27 AM
#1200001
John_in_Oz
What #1199885 said.
Awarded 1 Internet, slightly used, but well deserved.
8/30/2010 11:12:22 AM
#1200002
You accidentally discovered a new version of the ontological argument. You are also wrong, so meh.
8/30/2010 11:19:35 AM
#1200007
Lilith
Halo4man, next time you have a thought, just let it pass. You'll avoid looking like a bigger idiot next.
8/30/2010 11:29:57 AM
1 2 3 4