1 2 3
"Now this is what philosophers call a reductio ad absurdum"
The only absurdity here is coming from you. Dog-man doesn't exist, gay men do, do you get my drift? Nope, I thought not.
When you grow a brain, get back to us...
9/19/2010 9:10:43 AM
Gay men have no parents? Is this what you're trying to say?
9/19/2010 9:13:29 AM
You are a moron. If somehow you were able to reproduce with a dog *squick* then your dog-man offspring would in fact be your son. A dog-man or a homosexual is still your offspring whether you like what they are or not.
9/19/2010 9:13:53 AM
9/19/2010 9:15:37 AM
I'm a dog man myself. My housemate's a cat person, though.
And you're just a fucking idiot.
9/19/2010 9:20:58 AM
I hoppe you do have a son who's gay, just so he can see this and realize what a bigot you are.
9/19/2010 9:42:50 AM
Very compassionate, Mr. Brace.
9/19/2010 9:43:17 AM
So... if gay men have no parents, where do they come from? The Debul? I thought only Gawd could create life?
Of all the homophobic arguments I've heard, this is definitely the most absurd. And the most stupid. You're a fucking idiot, Barrack Muluka.
9/19/2010 9:43:48 AM
And you are what philosophers call a total fucking moron.
9/19/2010 10:12:42 AM
Chamale wins this one. >_>
9/19/2010 10:17:42 AM
Of course, reduce them as less than human.
Makes it easier to hate.
9/19/2010 10:53:30 AM
So you're rewriting the English language to change the definition of "son" from "male offspring" to "male offspring, provided he behaves the way I want him to"? Unlike the example, which is not a reductio ad absurdum, this is what philosophers call the "no true Scotsman" fallacy.
9/19/2010 10:57:02 AM
Wait...What? How can he not be somebody's son? Not everyone is bigoted as you are.
9/19/2010 11:21:20 AM
I read about the afterlife
If he came out of your wife's vagina nine months after you had sex with her -- he's your son, homosexual or no.
9/19/2010 11:27:34 AM
No, this is what philosophers call a straw dog.
9/19/2010 11:34:16 AM
Is he your son if he comes to America and becomes a Republican?
9/19/2010 11:41:18 AM
They ask you, 'suppose your son was a homosexual, what would you do?'
Do? What is their to do? It would be no different than if he was with a woman. Be there for him when he needs me. Make his husband feel welcome in the family(as long as he's deserving of my son, of course!).
Now this is what philosophers call a reductio ad absurdum. Suppose your son was a dog-man? Of course he cannot be my son if he is a homosexual, or a dog-man.
I can't even...what is this?
He could be my anything else, but not a son. He cannot be anybody's son. Sons don't marry other men, nor do they allow other men to marry them.
Here's to hoping all your children are gay!
9/19/2010 11:43:03 AM
Wait, wha? Wha? Wha? Does this guy even know what reductio ad absurdum means? Does he even know what homosexual means? Does he even know what son means?!
9/19/2010 12:01:53 PM
the old firm
"He could be my anything else, but not a son." -And this is why we can't have nice things.
9/19/2010 12:08:57 PM
You could have just said "I'd disown him" instead of jumping through hoops.
9/19/2010 12:38:20 PM
No. If you have a male child and you are one of the two people who provided the genetics that he has, that's your son.
You can disown him, but he's still your son whether he's gay or part-dog or a sparkly vampire.
9/19/2010 12:49:26 PM
No, he'd still be your son, and if you had the slightest bit of a heart you'd still love him for who he is.
But you probably don't and probably wouldn't.
9/19/2010 1:23:15 PM
I see you crossed over from denotation to connotation.
9/19/2010 1:53:54 PM
I find your comment quite absurd in many ways.
9/19/2010 3:07:50 PM
About what I would expect from an african...
9/19/2010 3:26:17 PM
1 2 3