Home Archives Random Quotes Latest Comments Top 100 Submit Quote Search Log In

Quote# 76308

Related to the heresy of democracy is the problem of freedom. In a Righteous Republic, there is freedom to worship, but in a democracy there is the worship of freedom. In the one, there is freedom to worship God according to the Bible, and unbiblical and pagan religions are suppressed. In the other, freedom itself is worshipped, and eventually the true worship of God is suppressed.

There is a sense in which ”freedom” is a good thing. The Bible says so. But it never advocates freedom merely as freedom, or freedom for freedom’s sake. The freedom God approves of is freedom from sin and freedom to worship and obey Him. God freed Israel from Egypt, not so the Jews could sin all they wanted to, but so they could worship and obey God rather than Pharaoh. The same is true in personal salvation: God saves us and frees us, not so that we can serve sin (which is slavery) but so that we can serve Christ (which is true freedom). See how it works?

“Freedom” in a democracy, however, has a different meaning altogether from freedom in a Righteous Republic. Democratic freedom is what is shown in Judges 21:25, “Everyone did what was right in his eyes.” Such freedom means freedom to “do your own thing,” regardless of what God or the Bible says. Democratic freedom means freedom to sin, not freedom to worship God in God’s way.

Most of us would agree that tyranny, such as Marxism, is against the idea of freedom of worship. That is only partly true. Human tyranny believes in a sort of freedom of worship – the freedom to worship Man, be he the Caesar, the Pharaoh, the Furher or the State, which is Man collectivized. Human tyranny does not recognize the freedom to worship God, for such is a false religion which must be suppressed.

Most see that in tyranny. Bur I suggest that the same is true in democracy, at least as it differs from the Righteous Republic. Granted, Christians may enjoy the freedom to worship God for awhile; many do. But in principle, democracy is antithetical to true worship of God. It is schizophrenic – it is pressed between righteousness and unrighteousness, between God and Man. And it always gives in to Man and unrighteousness. Eventually, democracy becomes an opponent of the Righteous Republic, and opens the door to one of two things.

Author Unknown, The Failure of Democracy 80 Comments [9/25/2010 1:48:18 PM]
Fundie Index: 94
WTF?! || meh
Username:
Comment:



1 2 3 4


Conservative wants a theocracy...*yawn*

9/30/2010 12:24:39 PM

Skyknight

By the way, am I the only one who thinks de Albatrus sounds a more calm-spirited edition of SPEPTeC's Robert T. Lee? (We have enough of his commentaries here; just search his name out) We have the scorn for all governments save theocracy (well, Lee favored Davidian Israel, de Albatrus favors the Massachusetts Bay Colony), we have the belief in predestination...

9/30/2010 3:03:30 PM

Leon

Translation: "Righteous Republic" = Theocratic Dictatorship.

10/1/2010 2:44:01 PM

DAR31337

Democracy is the opponent of your "Righteous Republic" because the latter recognizes the rights only of those who agree with it.
Democracy provides freedom to worship whatever deity you want.
I would never want to life in your two hypothetical societies because both wrongly suppress freedom of any people.
"Oh, glorious freedom, what shall I choose from among the excesses of the first world?"

12/9/2013 11:04:14 AM

the good samaritan

You are advocating a theocracy. The Pharaohs were a theocracy. The Roman Empire was a theocracy. The Church of England was a theocracy.

Do you really want to play THAT game again?

1/30/2014 8:23:13 PM
1 2 3 4