Quote# 7632

One, the things u have there for proof of evolution are in fact nothing but lies. Chew on this, that is an example of microevolution. Which that is possible by just pure experimentation. However, you are arguing that this 'microevolution' proves 'macroevolution.' U see there is a big difference. Micro has to deal with microscopic organisms Such as bacteria. Macro has to deal with visual organisms Such as things you can see(apes). The problem starts when u try to prove 'macroevolution' with 'microevolution.' YOu see there is proof for 'micro' but none for 'macro.' When you show me a picture of half ape half man then and only then can you state your evolution 'theory', which is really nothing but a religion, As fact. If you really want someone to show you more go to www.drdino.com . Peace out for right now. Remember none can stand against God....not even these evolution punks.

dcttrinity777, POD Warrior Forum 5 Comments [7/1/2004 12:00:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 7

Username  (Login)
Comment  (Text formatting help) 

1 | bottom


Truck of fail D: Microevolution is a short time frame; macro- deals with loooong frames. They are the same thing.

And "Dr." Hovind can go suck a dick. Fucking cereal-box diploma.

7/8/2008 3:21:06 PM


How is Hovind anyway? I hear he enjoys dropping the soap.

7/8/2008 3:35:18 PM


Chew on what? You haven't given any examples. I guess you forgot to, in your slobbering zeal to put words in quotes.

Since you are obviously not in the mood to do any research, I am not in the mood to swallow your shit. Move along, bucko.

7/8/2008 4:13:06 PM


There is no fucking division between micro and macroevolution.

9/6/2012 2:12:36 AM


Anyboy who can't even be bothered to spell a short word like "you" in full on a public forum is barely worth paying attention to. Be that as it may, micro- or macro-evolution are both evolution, you flaming idiot.

9/6/2012 4:10:31 AM

1 | top: comments page