1
#124814
Redhunter
You last line is correct.
Not to say that YOU are correct, but that one line is. Everything else is crap.
12/20/2006 10:37:28 AM
#124941
Dallen
since \"scientific\" dating methods have been proven unreliable
Reference please.
12/20/2006 2:56:56 PM
#250368
Robbie
I believe this person is going for the World Record of Most Wrong-ness in a Single Sentence.
6/13/2007 1:05:19 PM
#250383
Pandus
Why do they always think that evolution was thought up as a way to dodge sin?
6/13/2007 1:34:56 PM
#250425
Laurle
[sigh] Wind'em up and the same bullshit comes out over and over and over and over. 'Cept you forgot the second law of thermodynamics. And nobody seems to be using the bombardier beetle much these days.
6/13/2007 3:28:00 PM
#250452
szena
If there is no Creator, there can be no sin, and no need of a Saviour.
Exactly. And that's what you find so threatening about it.
6/13/2007 4:39:00 PM
#250504
agentCDE
Worst. Strawman. EVER.
6/13/2007 6:34:47 PM
#250511
BurntBush
Even if I didn't believe in evolution, I could not believe in a god, especially yours.
6/13/2007 6:47:49 PM
#250725
Freboy
How does the unreliability of technology prove the Babble right?
6/14/2007 10:31:15 AM
#250732
Safaraz
Apart from all your strawmen, I believe in god, but I don't believe in sin or the need of a "Saviour", so your wrong even about that.
6/14/2007 10:45:12 AM
#1420829
Quantum Mechanic
Lie much?
7/7/2012 12:16:21 PM
#1420836
Filin De Blanc
Flip that around and you get the reason for denial of evolution - if the Bible isn't true, then fundies have no authority to tell the rest of us what to do, which they love doing.
7/7/2012 12:38:01 PM
1