Now we come to the wonderful world of TAXONOMY, where cartoon charts are used to artificially classify bones in order to "prove" evolution. This is where evolutionists develop a "disneyland" mentally and construct a chart which shows the earth to be about 4.5 billion years old. Then they proceed to divide this chart up into various time frames containing hundreds of millions of years each. As new discoveries are found, the scientists conveniently place them at selected places on the chart.
This would be a dandy little system, except for one minor problem: THEY'VE NEVER PROVEN THE ORIGINAL CHART! It's nothing more than blind guesswork. No one has ever proven that the earth is 4.5 billion years old. The chart is NOT scientific. In fact, many scientists believe that the earth isn't over 6,000 to 10,000 years old! Of course, all opposing views are ignored by evolutionary scientists, for they need a nice big time period in which to place their new findings. You've heard of people "buying time?" Well, evolutionists just DREAM IT UP.
Another "proof" for evolution is COMPARATIVE ANATOMY, the belief that similar bone structures prove animal kin through evolution. That is, if two different animals have similar bone structures, then they must have evolved from the same original ancestors. Of course, this is more
nonsense. Any scientist knows perfectly well that many such bone structures are produced by entirely DIFFERENT GENES, thus proving that they are in NO WAY RELATED! In fact, if similar bone structure proves anything, it proves that these animals were created by the same God!
James L. Melton, Evolution: Fact or Fiction? 61 Comments
[10/28/2010 3:29:14 AM]
Fundie Index: 91
1 2 3
That's not taxonomy. Everything else after that is just more failure icing on your shitcake.
10/29/2010 7:14:09 AM
Those loudmouthed Christian idiots running trying to prove creationism do not count as "many scientists".
Just so were clear.
10/29/2010 12:12:32 PM
Except they have proven the age of the Earth. BIOLOGISTS haven't, sure, but GEOLOGISTS have, and since the geologists are the ones in charge of that shit, they win.
10/29/2010 12:51:01 PM
TEH... STOOPID... IZ... OVER... WHALMIN'... [/LOLcat]
Hey, Jimmy, stop projecting: starting from conclusions based on a faulty, discredited source and attempting to shoehorn the evidence into your model is your modus operandi.
Also remember that even if someone managed to discredit the ToE and modern geology (which isn't bloody likely), that still wouldn't make your fairy tale correct.
@breakerslion: that's a Watership Down reference, isn't it?
10/29/2010 1:14:55 PM
Or... all these animals were brought by the same stork!
10/29/2010 8:55:27 PM
So they are wrong and their evidence is wrong...and if it was right anyway then it would prove you right and not them? I am so confused by your logic...maybe its because you are fucking stupid.
10/29/2010 10:28:58 PM
But... taxonomy predates the theory of evolution.
10/30/2010 2:37:52 AM
I would like to recommend Why Evolution Is True, by Jerry Coyne. It's a very clear, well-written book that explains why evolution undoubtedly took place (and is continuing to take place).
10/30/2010 9:33:34 AM
I HAD A STROKE FROM ALL THE STUPID AND MY LEFT HAND IS PARALYZED AND STUCK ON LEFT SHIFT
SOMEONE CALL AN AMBULANCE.
11/1/2010 5:53:41 AM
That reminds me, I was going to buy an anatomy textbook today. Thanks for reminding me. Maybe I should pick one up for you and bash you over the head with it.
Just because you don't understand something and don't want to believe it doesn't make you right, STUPID.
11/2/2010 10:37:42 AM
11/11/2010 1:05:37 PM
1 2 3