1 2 3
I'm sure the irony of calling out the left as sexist is lost on you.
11/10/2010 8:17:00 AM
Somtimes, I wish these folks, especially the women, could experinces what the 1950's were ACCTUALLY LIKE.
Might put a new perspective on the "Man-hateing Feminist".
11/10/2010 8:20:58 AM
Yes, the left oppress women so much, like by giving them the opportunity to pursue careers if they wish and not be limited to options of Secretary, Waitress or the likes, or telling them that they shouldn't be forced to carry a child to term if they do not feel they can care for it, or if it will endanger their health, or telling women that their implicit duty isn't just to be barefoot and pregnant in the kitchen, and that any dissent (read: any time her views don't align with that of her man's) should not be met with her being smacked around.
Yes, liberals are SO anti-woman.
11/10/2010 8:34:51 AM
What is this supposed to be.
11/10/2010 8:37:22 AM
Serously Sarah, wtf are you talking about? IMO the quickest way to world peace is through the global empowerment of women. That doesn't sound very sexist.
11/10/2010 8:39:23 AM
If I hadn't been sitting in the office, I would have laughed out loud at that one.
Isn't it the Conservatives who want the women to stay in the kitchen and have babies? Who want to follow the Bible saying women should not rule over men?
Does little Sahrah know what the word Conservative means?
Most feminists don't hate men. Many feminists ARE men.
Women ARE a minority, at least in politics. Not an ethnic one, sure, but still...
What strong woman calls herself Maid of Albion? It sounds ULTRA-conservative, or rather reactionary; something from the medieval times.
11/10/2010 8:54:00 AM
Wait, what? How much money does Sarah spend on mirror polish? She may be a "strong woman", but she knows nothing about anything. Most women in American politics are liberal Democrats; people like Sarah Palin and Christine O'Donnell are the exceptions.
Both Sarahs (Palin and the Maid of Albion) are a disgrace to people named Sarah. My cousin is ashamed...
11/10/2010 8:54:53 AM
No, if they know what they're doing, the Republicans won't nominate Sarah Palin. It's not that the left hates women in positions of power, they hate stupid women in positions of power.
11/10/2010 8:55:56 AM
Well, Sarah's right - the left probably isn't going to vote for a woman who isn't a liberal; but they're not going to vote for a man who isn't a liberal, either.
Only Conservatives love strong women
Yeah, they need a strong woman to scrub the floor, do the laundry and deliver beer to their husbands while dealing with a new baby every year.
11/10/2010 9:05:23 AM
"Only Conservatives love strong women, the left are far too sexist to forgive any woman who dares to step beyond the limited roles"
Would those roles be brood mare, meal cooker and beer can delivery?
11/10/2010 9:09:15 AM
Things Conservatives Believe:
Women are inferior to men, and should be barefoot, pregnant, in the kitchen, and quiet; unless they're really hot and run for political office as Republicans.
11/10/2010 9:15:21 AM
Sarah, honey, you're a mere woman, and I'm a man. If you're going to be consistently conservative, quit your yapping and fetch me a beer.
What's that? You won't? Then you're a politically correct, man-hating, feminist, liberal victim.
11/10/2010 9:20:07 AM
Yes, the Democratic Party's shellacking of Hillary Clinton proves your claim the left are far too sexist to elect a woman.
--------------- Obama --------- Clinton
States carried- 29+DC+GU+DA+VI 21+PR+AS
Popular vote--- 17,869,542---- 18,046,007
Percentage----- 47.4% --------- 47.9%
Appointing someone Secretary of State is the most common way to hunt down and destroy an opponent.
11/10/2010 9:20:35 AM
The Conservatives are far too sexist to forgive any woman who dares step beyond their idea of acceptable roles too. The only difference here is that "their idea of acceptable roles too" is in fact a euphemism for "the threshold of the kitchen".
11/10/2010 9:31:58 AM
Goddamnit, there goes my irony meter!
11/10/2010 9:50:46 AM
They keep using that term but I don't think it means what they think it means.
11/10/2010 9:55:43 AM
Think or GTFO
That's some industrial strength psychological projection.
What's next? Is she going to accuse liberals and progressives for being conservative and backwards?
11/10/2010 10:09:01 AM
Most leftists I know aren't terribly concerned about "roles" and let women do, well, whatever they want to do.
11/10/2010 10:09:04 AM
Just because I think the women conservatives put up as politicians are completely batshit crazy doesn't mean that I'm sexist. It means your that Palin, Bachman, O'Donnel, Whitman, Angle, et al. are, in my opinion, crazy and deserving of sedation, therapy, straight jackets, and a rubber room.
11/10/2010 10:20:04 AM
"left are far too sexist to forgive any woman who dares to step beyond the limited roles.. Liberal..."
So you're blaming the liberal* party of this country for wanting a female candidate to be liberal? That's ... not really sexism.
Let me guess: you're just butthurt that Sarah Palin didn't get elected VP, aren't you? Here's a tip: it had less to do with "Political Correctness" and more to do with the fact that during the election she didn't actually know what the VP's job was! (among other things)
Also, forgive me if I decline to take advice about political correctness from someone who thinks interracial marriage is a liberal plot.
* Yes, I know that the Democratic party of the US isn't really liberal compared to the rest of the world, but it's all we've got right now...
11/10/2010 10:27:11 AM
I see it's Opposite Day again in Fundieland.
11/10/2010 10:27:49 AM
All right. I'll bite. Would Palin or O'Donnell have gotten anywhere as far as they have within the conservative movement if they weren't good-looking? I know it's a sexist thing to say, but they quite literally have no other redeeming qualities whatsoever.
I don't consider it a sign of strength that they're such dimwitted buffoons that I sometimes question how they manage to figure out how to keep breathing.
11/10/2010 10:28:35 AM
i love it when they do these complete 180s....
11/10/2010 10:35:53 AM
It's because of the changing of the generations that these 180s are happening. The losers of the culture war of the 60s are getting old and dying, and being replaced by people who grew up after that war was over.
Teabaggers (in their old guise as moral majority, christian coalition etc.) used to demonise Martin Luther King as a communist, a prostitute hirer, a rabble rouser, a liberal race mixer government handout sponger. Now conservatives are reclaiming Kings legacy from the liberals who have hijacked it over the past 40 years.
11/10/2010 10:48:26 AM
Women in leadership positions?
"Would Palin or O'Donnell have gotten anywhere as far as they have within the conservative movement if they weren't good-looking?"
One of my best friends is a business-style Republican. The only argument he made in favor of Palin is that she's hawt.
First of all, obviously, when we're talking about women in their 40s Salma Hayek is hot, Palin is not. Second and more importantly, a candidate's looks have fuck-all to do with competence.
I'd prefer watery tarts distributing swords, personally.
11/10/2010 10:54:26 AM
1 2 3