Home Archives Random Quotes Latest Comments Top 100 Submit Quote Search Log In

Quote# 78198

[Re. the repeal of "Don't Ask, Don't Tell."]

The armies of other nations have allowed gays to serve openly in the military. The reason they could afford to do this is simple: they could allow homosexuals to serve in their military because we didn’t allow them to serve in ours.

They knew they could count on the strength, might, power, and cohesion of the U.S. military to intervene whenever and wherever necessary to pull their fannies out of the fire and squash the forces of tyranny wherever they raised their ugly heads around the world.

Those days are now gone. We will no longer be able to bail out these other emasculated armies because ours will now be feminized and neutered beyond repair, and there is no one left to bail us out. We have been permanently weakened as a military and as a nation by these misguided and treasonous Republican senators, and the world is now a more dangerous place for us all.

Bryan Fischer, Rightly Concerned 101 Comments [12/22/2010 6:26:09 AM]
Fundie Index: 112
Submitted By: DevilsChaplain
WTF?! || meh
Username:
Comment:



1 2 3 4 5


Because gays totally aren't in the army now

And nobody knows any gay guys who serve

Right

12/22/2010 6:28:11 AM

Mister Spak

The armies of other nations have allowed gays to serve openly in the military. The reason they could afford to do this is simple: They don't let bigoted christianists run their country.

12/22/2010 6:28:16 AM

The_L

Before DADT repeal: dishonest, hidden gay people in the military.
After DADT repeal: honest, open gay people in the military.

Gee, I wonder which I'd rather have...

12/22/2010 6:31:15 AM

Tardis

Gee - we heard the same thing about racial integration back in the '40's and '50's...how did that work out?

12/22/2010 6:44:43 AM



I can’t even come up with a response to this…

12/22/2010 6:50:54 AM

Anon

As a member of the British Armed Forces, I just like to say that our "emasculated" forces just love it when your attempts to "pull our fannies out of the fire" result in you dropping "the strength, might, power, and cohesion of the U.S. military" on OUR FUCKING TROOPS. AGAIN AND AGAIN AND AGAIN YOU MORONS ACCIDENTALLY KILL THE WRONG PEOPLE, I THINK HAVING GAYS IN YOUR FORCES IS THE LEAST OF YOUR FUCKING PROBLEMS!!!

12/22/2010 6:51:12 AM

Whitespirit

Yep, we could always rely on the us forces.

Normally to blow the fuck out of our forces in freindly fire incidenst because they were so fucking useless but we 'could' rely on them.

12/22/2010 6:52:35 AM

Mister Spak

Anon:

Fundies, like their god, have bad aim.

12/22/2010 7:04:45 AM

Dan Onymous

Name any two wars the US has won. Sequels don't count.

You could start by working out the difference between shooting at enemies and shooting at allies.

And besides, the SAS have had gays in before and any one of them would piss all over pretty much any US soldiers.

12/22/2010 7:24:43 AM

Doubting Thomas

I'm pretty sure the Israeli army, which allows women and gays to serve, is still pretty badass.

And I really take exception with this "feminized and neutered beyond repair" stereotype, as if every gay person is a limp-wristed, effeminate pansy who's so wussy that he'd scream like a girl, drop his rifle and run the other way if he saw enemy troops.

And as I said before, if all our enemies are as homophobic as American fundies are, then they'd be afraid to attack us for fear the gheys in our military might capture them, find them attractive, and start coming on to them.

12/22/2010 7:24:46 AM

Panz

I suppose if you ignore the fact that gays do serve in the US military, you might be right

12/22/2010 7:37:44 AM



"The reason they could afford to do this is simple: they could allow homosexuals to serve in their military because we didn’t allow them to serve in ours."

o_O What?

"They knew they could count on the strength, might, power, and cohesion of the U.S. military to intervene whenever and wherever necessary to pull their fannies out of the fire and squash the forces of tyranny wherever they raised their ugly heads around the world."

Oh you're going the "all gay guys are pansies" route. Rob Halford would like a word with you.

12/22/2010 7:38:27 AM

Zeus Almighty

Yes, from now on this is how the U.S. Army will operate when it invades a country.

11 a.m.: Reveille consisting of a Streisand tune.
11:30-12:15: Do each other's hair.
12:30: Brunch
1 p.m.: Mimosas on the terrace.
1:30 p.m.: Set up pink tents, unload supplies of lube and condoms.
2 p.m.-4:30 p.m.: Mandatory gay orgy.
4:45 p.m.-7-ish: Shopping.
8 p.m.: Light dinner
9 p.m.-10 p.m.: Seek new "recruits"/rape underage boys.
11 p.m.: Disco!
???? a.m.: Settle in for a long night of hot, sweaty man sex with your partner/partners du jour.

12/22/2010 7:38:52 AM

SpukiKitty

#1237065


"The reason they could afford to do this is simple: they could allow homosexuals to serve in their military because we didn’t allow them to serve in ours."

o_O What?

"They knew they could count on the strength, might, power, and cohesion of the U.S. military to intervene whenever and wherever necessary to pull their fannies out of the fire and squash the forces of tyranny wherever they raised their ugly heads around the world."

Oh you're going the "all gay guys are pansies" route. Rob Halford would like a word with you.

(pic of Rob Halfold, looking badass)



....and Alexander The Great...those Gangsta punks on the DL...and the Spartans...those big, hulking, masculine, blue-collar good-ol'-boy BEARS who would eat you for breakfast....

12/22/2010 7:43:21 AM

MarylandBear

Does anyone else suspect that Bryan Fischer is Ann Coulter, just without the drag queen gear?

12/22/2010 7:48:11 AM

shykid

"They knew they could count on the strength, might, power, and cohesion of the U.S. military to intervene whenever and wherever necessary to pull their fannies out of the fire and squash the forces of tyranny wherever they raised their ugly heads around the world."

lmfao, here's a little protip for you, Bry: The rest of the world usually hates it when we play "Team America: World Police".

"We will no longer be able to bail out these other emasculated armies because ours will now be feminized and neutered beyond repair, and there is no one left to bail us out."

And I want you to call these guys "feminized" and "neutered":



Go on now, do it. Say it to their faces.

12/22/2010 7:54:55 AM

Horsefeathers

"The armies of other nations have allowed gays to serve openly in the military. The reason they could afford to do this is simple: they could allow homosexuals to serve in their military because we didn’t allow them to serve in ours."

Say what?

"They knew they could count on the strength, might, power, and cohesion of the U.S. military to intervene whenever and wherever necessary to pull their fannies out of the fire and squash the forces of tyranny wherever they raised their ugly heads around the world."

Yes. I'm sure that's exactly what they were thinking.

"Those days are now gone."

Much like your mind it would seem.

"We will no longer be able to bail out these other emasculated armies because ours will now be feminized and neutered beyond repair, and there is no one left to bail us out."

Weren't people like you saying the same fucking thing when women started serving in the field rather than on base in an office?

"We have been permanently weakened as a military and as a nation by these misguided and treasonous Republican senators, and the world is now a more dangerous place for us all."

That's what happens when we let people like you run loose unsupervised.

12/22/2010 7:56:54 AM

Ken

Other countries do NOT worship the ground we walk on. And thank you for not only insulting gays, but females as well. I bet many gays and females could kick your ass.

12/22/2010 8:41:39 AM

Joe Mama

??? I just don't get this. Why are these people arguing that our military is going to be ineffective because of gays, when gays have been serving for the past 17 years since DADT was implemented? I mean, the gays are already in the military, so allowing them to be open about their sexuality will not ruin the military's effectiveness any. If anything, it will just let servicemembers know who not to bother asking out on a date.

12/22/2010 9:01:00 AM

aaa

I don't think i would call IDF or the French Foreign legion emasculated.

12/22/2010 9:15:42 AM



Hey, Bryan. Say that bit about emasculated armies to the SAS, the IDF, or the Dutch Marines. We'll come sweep the bits of you up afterward.

12/22/2010 9:15:45 AM



H'm. Did the Viet Cong allow gays, I wonder? I'm just askin'.

12/22/2010 9:16:50 AM

John_in_Oz

Ha, you're in the wrong website! You were looking for WRONGLY concerned, obviously.

12/22/2010 9:18:09 AM

BalthazarTheWise

To shamelessly paraphrase and rip off Steve Hughes:

How can you say that they're weak and effeminate? They fuck men!

Not like straight guys who want someone soft, delicate, pretty...they want to fuck a bloke.

Also, if Japan or China fielded an army of younger females, you know, to make people hesitate to actually shoot at them, I'd want an army of women and gays out there.

12/22/2010 9:56:44 AM

Mudak

Wait. Every time we've engaged in a foreign war in my lifetime (38 years now), we've wanted other countries to join us so that we wouldn't go it alone, so to speak. That's them bailing us out, not the other way around.

And there have undoubtedly been gay people who've wanted to serve but chose not to because of either DADT or the prior outright ban on them, thus keeping otherwise qualified soldiers out of the army etc. So how could this be anything short of a tool to help improve enlistment numbers?

12/22/2010 10:17:42 AM
1 2 3 4 5