savagesusie #fundie

savagesusie #fundie freerepublic.com

The cultural Marxist have been trying to “smash monogamy” as [Bill] Ayer’s wife yelled to her followers....

You have to destroy the two pillars of Western Civilization that made it great so that you can destroy the culture and take it over.

Christian ethics and the natural family are the two pillars. Destroy that paradigm and you create an immoral, atheist military no different than the Nazis and the Russian one—both so immoral they made Patton physically ill.

Zero wants an immoral military so he can turn them against the citizenry.

Homosexuality destroys the Christian paradigm faster than anything. It will be the same result as putting women into the same barracks as the men. Makes the Bible “hate speech” and makes immorality rampant. Nothing is more destructive to societies then sins of the flesh. Military will impose “reeducation” centers on our Christian men and either force them to change their thinking or force them out as bigots.

Marxists deny the nature of man. They believe in social engineering and in doing so—have to have a totalitarian society. You can not have freedom of thought under their ideology because it goes against nature.

65 comments

old comment by Anon-e-moose

"smash monogamy"

Speaking from my woodwork days in school, do you have any idea how hard mahogany is?

'MAHO!?'

(Himeko from the anime series "Pani Poni Dash". Basically "Azumanga Daioh" on crack)

Fundamentalists deny the nature of man. They believe in dogmatic engineering and in doing sohave to have a theotarian society. You can not have freedom of thought under their theocratic ideology, because it goes against human nature.

fixed

@BalthazarTheWise

"Zero?

Hey savagesusie I love Code Geass too but I know it's not actually real, even if I sometimes wish it were."

Damn good anime series; One of Sunrise's finest, since "Gundam" (especially "SEED/Destiny" & "OO"). Recruiting the Four Goddesses of manga CLAMP for the character designs. And of course, Jun Fukuyama as the voice of Lelouch/Zero (to say nothing of Norio Wakamoto VA'ing Emperor Charles. Pure genius on the part of Sunrise's casting!). Not for nothing did it become a phenomenon in Japan.

@Garmin

"Zero" would be the current POTUS, as in "ZerObama"

Considering the above, Obama as Zero only makes him more awesome. (removing fake contact lens from left eye): 'Obama commands you...':

Repeal DADT!'

X3

@Raised by Horses

"@Doubting Thomas

Major Zero?"

Meself, I was thinking more along these lines:

Sgt Major Zero (voiced by "It Ain't Half Hot Mum"'s Windsor Davies), one of the Zeroids in the Gerry Anderson series "Terrahawks".

@Berny

"And just who the fuck is "Zero"? Is that their new moronic nickname for Obama?"

Like I say - comparing Obama to "Code Geass"'s Zero, it only makes him all the more awesome. Thus is their 'insult' towards Obama turned against them.

old comment by dionysus

Christian ethics and the natural family are the two pillars.

And here I thought that free speech and democracy were the major building blocks of Western civilization.

Homosexuality destroys the Christian paradigm faster than anything.

Then it's a pretty damn weak paradigm if the mere existence of a group of people destroys it.

It will be the same result as putting women into the same barracks as the men.

Lolwut?

Makes the Bible “hate speech”

The Bible makes itself hate speech.

and makes immorality rampant

Right, because in the days when homosexual were killed we NEVER had wars, greed, or atrocities. Everyone knows that Genghis Khan went across Asia and Europe distributing lollipops and rainbows.

Nothing is more destructive to societies then sins of the flesh.

Not even nukes or a giant asteroid?

Military will impose “reeducation” centers on our Christian men and either force them to change their thinking or force them out as bigots.

No they won't so you can stop fapping to this imaginary persecution.

old comment by Brendan Rizzo

Marxists? Seriously? Everything you don't like is Marxist with you guys. Well, news flash: it isn't. I always thought that Enlightenment (including human rights) and secularism were the two "pillars of Western society" that make it so great. Not all cultures have Western-style marriage, and most of them are doing just fine, so marriage is not as important as you think it is. Even then, allowing homosexuals to marry does not impinge on the right of heterosexuals to marry in any way. As for Christian ethics, the U.S. was founded as a secular nation-- sure there are a lot of Christians, but since atheists are not immoral (and studies actually show a negative correlation between religiosity and morality) you are wrong. Also, the Wehrmacht was made up largely of Christians (does "Gott mit uns" ring a bell?) and only the highest officials in the Soviet Union were really atheistic. However, they were not the secular humanists that American and European atheists are, so it is just as irrational to blame American and European atheists for the crimes of communism as it is to blame Christians for Islamic terrorism, if not more. One last thing: gays have been allowed in the military ever since DADT was instituted (and there were probably some closeted ones even before that) and open homosexuals have served in European militaries for decades. Absolutely nothing has happened to make either the American or European armed forces weaker or less effective. Does the Sacred Band of Thebes ring a bell?

Phew, I managed to refute everything in that pile of bullshit.

old comment by ANALH

Why are you so threatened by this?

NOBODY is going to force people into polyamory.

You can't force people to quit a consentual social relationship. I agree we need to "smash monogamy". Implicit in the norm of monogamy is possession and objectification. It treats the other person as an object that only "you" have rights to. It reduces love and sex to a commodity. Some couples become so controlling and jealous they get upset if the other simply has friends who are their(the jealous controlling one's) sex, essentially commodifying human relationships themselves.

Love should be free. It's reasonable for people to take precautions against STDs such as condoms, testing, and the formation of polyfidelity groups with a testing requirement.

Still as much as I hate "monogamy" I wouldn't force people to abandon it and I don't think many would. Just like I see religion as reactionary but wouldn't force people to give up religion.

old comment by Zer0

atheist military no different than the Nazis

God with us (Gott mit uns) on the nazi's belt buckels isn't very atheist, don't you think?

Makes the Bible “hate speech” and makes immorality rampant.

Points out that the Bible has its fair share of "hate speech" parts, and further questions it's suggested moral behavior. I guess that's what you wanted to say.

Nothing is more destructive to societies then sins of the flesh

I wouldn't bet on it, but large quantities of individuals following hallicunations of a giant invisible space dadday would come first on my list.

Military will impose “reeducation” centers on our Christian men and either force them to change their thinking or force them out as bigots.

Only those labled as "batshit insane, sociopathic and legemitating that behaviour through aboved mentioned sky daddy".

old comment by Often Partisan

"The cultural Marxist have been trying to “smash monogamy” as [Bill] Ayer’s wife yelled to her followers...."

"Bourgeois marriage is, in reality, a system of wives in common and thus, at the most, what the Communists might possibly be reproached with is that they desire to introduce, in substitution for a hypocritically concealed, an openly legalised community of women. For the rest, it is self-evident that the abolition of the present system of production must bring with it the abolition of the community of women springing from that system, i.e., of prostitution both public and private. "(The Manifesto)

"Marxists deny the nature of man."

"A spider conducts operations that resemble those of a weaver, and a bee puts to shame many an architect in the construction of her cells. But what distinguishes the worst architect from the best of bees is this, that the architect raises his structure in imagination before he erects it in reality." (Capital Vol I)