Home Archives Random Quotes Latest Comments Top 100 Submit Quote Search Log In

Quote# 78621

[Re. gays and lesbians in the military.]

Its only a matter of time before they'll be fucking one another on ships and if anyone says anything about it, it will be "discrimination."

Those in the military that are opposed to this shit should beat the fuck out of the nancy-boys and bull-dikes that come out.

If you dont stomp them out now they'll walk all over you... Fuck them - they're the ones with the odd fucking problem, if they want to be stupid and come out the closet and make a big deal about who they fuck then they should get fucked up.

nick, Moonbattery 67 Comments [1/8/2011 5:16:56 AM]
Fundie Index: 126
Submitted By: Honky McCracker
WTF?! || meh
Username:
Comment:



1 2 3
The_L

"Gay people might start relationships, let's beat the fuck out of them so they don't!"

Based on this same logic, I propose we make life hell for straight male servicemen, to prevent them from raping servicewomen.

1/8/2011 5:33:02 AM



Congratulations The_L, you are not one bit better than the man you criticize.

1/8/2011 5:50:06 AM



I read the first line and mimed a fapping action. And laughed.

1/8/2011 5:54:14 AM

Scooby71

Well, it'll be nothing new. The British Navy seemed to tolerate it well enough for a couple of hundred years.

According to Google labs, the phrase "Rum, sodomy, and the lash" appears in books going back to 1650.


1/8/2011 6:02:20 AM

Philip from Australia

Perhaps someone actually in an branch of the armed services can answer this for me -

What is the reaction if a heterosexual couple have sex on ship?

My gut is that it would be a violation of some regulation. A homosexual liaison would fall under the same regulation.

So no problem.

If it isn't against some regulation, how do they deal with heterosexual sex now?

Thanks.

1/8/2011 6:09:18 AM

whatever

@#1242649
"Congratulations The_L, you are not one bit better than the man you criticize."

It's pretty obvious The_L meant it as sarcasm/irony.

1/8/2011 6:11:44 AM

Itachirumon

"Those in the military that are opposed to this shit should beat the fuck out of the nancy-boys and bull-dikes that come out."

I got an idea... in the parallel universe where I join the millitary... you go right ahead and try that, and I turn your life into some Saw sh*t for f*cking with me. It was self-defense your honor, he came at me with intent to kill because I was gay (which IS discrimination btw, I suppose if that's your way of "saying something about it" then no wonder everyone calls it what it is). I gave him a single warning to back off, when he came forward I emptied my handgun deep into his testicles to stop his advancement.

Or you know... "stuff" with Katanas is always fun too, I'm just sayin'

1/8/2011 6:13:18 AM

anevilmeme

The scope, depth & power of Christian love never ceases to amaze me.

1/8/2011 6:14:29 AM

shadkat

Just nancy-boys and bull-dykes? All right, what about the hard gays and the lipstick lesbians? Are they okay? Or! What about the million shades in-between the stereotypes that gays actually tend to be?

1/8/2011 6:23:00 AM

Doubting Thomas

Its only a matter of time before they'll be fucking one another on ships and if anyone says anything about it, it will be "discrimination."

It's been going on a long time. And as long as it's not interfering with their ability to perform their duties, it should be considered discrimination. After all, nobody says anything about male and female servicemembers having sex.

As for the rest of your rant, typical homophobic hate speech.

1/8/2011 7:00:17 AM

arcturus

for the same reason, heterosexual relationships are also banned, so it's hardly discrimination. If you start a relationship with someone, they'll just move them to another ship and you can wait for shore leave.

1/8/2011 7:12:53 AM

tmarcl

@Philip from Australia

Perhaps someone actually in an branch of the armed services can answer this for me -
What is the reaction if a heterosexual couple have sex on ship?
My gut is that it would be a violation of some regulation. A homosexual liaison would fall under the same regulation.
So no problem.
If it isn't against some regulation, how do they deal with heterosexual sex now?
Thanks.


It is a violation of Navy Regs. The couple is usually sent to NJP (non-judicial punishment) and risk losing rank as well as pay in addtion to loss of liberty and extra work.

And you're right, homosexual sex would then fall under the same regs.

1/8/2011 7:13:47 AM

John_in_Oz

@ The L

I dunno, I can't see how you could have made it any bloody clearer "Based on this same logic..."

A perfect demonstration of his locical fallacies by reductio ad absurdam. Commiserations on being so badly misunderstood.
BTW, love your work.

1/8/2011 7:16:34 AM

GM2

@Philip from Australia

I was in the US Navy from 2003 to 07. Sex between servicemembers of any orientation on a ship is a violation of the Uniform Code of Military Justice and it is usually punished by involuntary separation or a reduction in rank and paygrade. Had a lot of gays and lesbians on my ship (USS Tarawa, for the curious) but it was usually straight couples that were actually caught doing anything (I can remember a single instance of two women sleeping in the same rack (bunk) but since there wasn't anything sexual about it they basically got slaps on the wrist).

1/8/2011 7:38:45 AM

Berny

Its only a matter of time before they'll be fucking one another on ships and if anyone says anything about it, it will be "discrimination."

The last time I checked the rules, they stated that any such kind of fraternization between heterosexual members of the military was also forbidden. Why would they treat same-sex members differently when all they wanted was to be treated the same?
You fail at rational thinking.

1/8/2011 7:44:41 AM

Mihangel apYrs

says Nick, from the safety of mom's basement, from behind the sofa.

1/8/2011 7:58:31 AM

nazani14

Actually, "fraternization" in any military unit is likely to cause problems. It's a violation of the UCMJ to be gettin' it on with anyone in your chain of command. If an officer develops a relationship or is sleeping with a subordinate, they will usually have to resign their commission. You can pretty much screw everyone at your own rank level, until the point where it interferes with unit performance, and then you'll face some kind of punishment for 'moral turpitude.' Troops can also be disciplined for adultery.

Before there were women in the military, there were still problems with troops being late for formations, etc., because they were off base with girlfriends or camp followers.

1/8/2011 8:08:46 AM

Horsefeathers

"Its only a matter of time before they'll be fucking one another on ships and if anyone says anything about it, it will be "discrimination.""

Do you have any problem with crew members of the opposite sex doing this?

If so, shut the fuck up.

If not, why the hell not?

"Those in the military that are opposed to this shit should beat the fuck out of the nancy-boys and bull-dikes that come out."

Does Leavenworth mean anything to you?

"If you dont stomp them out now they'll walk all over you... Fuck them - they're the ones with the odd fucking problem, if they want to be stupid and come out the closet and make a big deal about who they fuck then they should get fucked up."

You sound as if you're upset that everyone seems to be fucking someone but no one is fucking you.

Here's my advice: go fuck yourself.

1/8/2011 8:13:58 AM

John

Its only a matter of time before they'll be fucking one another on ships and if anyone says anything about it, it will be "discrimination."

A man isn't allowed to do anything with another man that he isn't allowed to do with a woman.

925. ART. 125. SODOMY

(a) Any person subject to this chapter who engages in unnatural carnal copulation with another person of the same or opposite sex or with an animal is guilty of sodomy. Penetration , however slight, is sufficient to complete the offense.

(b) Any person found guilty of sodomy shall be punished as a court-martial may direct.


Those in the military that are opposed to this shit should beat the fuck out of the nancy-boys and bull-dikes that come out.

And if they do, they'll be court-martialed and dishonorably discharged.

928. ART. 128. ASSAULT

(a) Any person subject to this chapter who attempts or offers with unlawful force or violence to do bodily harm to another person, whether or not the attempt or offer is consummated, is guilty of assault and shall be punished as a court-martial may direct.

(b) Any person subject to this chapter who--

(1) commits an assault with a dangerous weapon or other means or force likely to produce death or grievous bodily harm; or

(2) commits an assault and intentionally inflicts grievous bodily harm with or without a weapon;

is guilty of aggravated assault and shall be punished as a court-martial may direct.



1/8/2011 8:17:35 AM

Scooby71

Double post.


1/8/2011 8:42:30 AM

Me

Believe me, people (both gay and straight) have been fucking each other to their heart's content at sea (and ashore) for a long time.

And the sky hasn't fallen yet.

1/8/2011 8:44:27 AM

Zeus Almighty

Tell you what nick, put your money where your mouth is. Join the Marines and take on one of your gay comrades. And I hope afterwards you have to pick your teeth up off the floor.

1/8/2011 8:55:41 AM

Lotus-thing

Wow, somebody has misplaced aggression issues, there. Must be tough going through life with so much anger. If these people weren't so spiteful and potentially dangerous I'd actually feel kind of bad for them.

1/8/2011 9:24:34 AM



Hey nick! Your turn in the barrel!

1/8/2011 9:25:03 AM

SpukiKitty

Internet Tuff Guy speaketh in "Strange Tongues"....then mommy shoves Lifebouy in his mouth!

Quite a Christian vocabulary you have there, NOT!

C'mon, Tuff Guy, there's a big, bad, burly, blue-collar, good-ol'-boy, chaw-chompin', beer-swillin', 300 lb. "Bear" over there...just spout that BS to his face, sissy boy! I'll be checkin' the papers for your obituary, doofus.

1/8/2011 9:28:03 AM
1 2 3