Creation has no scientific support.
Any subject that deals with unquantifiable/immeasurable/unobservable phenomena cannot be scientific. "Creationism" speaks of an intelligent and conscious creator of the universe who exists beyond human observation. Hence creationism cannot possibly be classified as a science, deal with it.
There are no world wide catastrophic flood evidences in the fossil record.
Present a credible proof then whydontcha...
Creationism denies the existence of improvements in the design of creation.
Micro yes, macro no, right? Unlike your side, we actually bother listening to the opposing arguments, no matter how asinine they may be.
Creationism teaches racism.
Not racism, the word you're looking for is "idiocy".
Creationism is contrary to the laws of all science.
Creationism is not recognized as legitimate science by any leading scientists.
Same response to these two as your first point.
Creation science is a mindless religion.
No, but it is certainly motivated by mindless religion.
The speed of light can not be changed and therefore proves the age of the universe.
The speed of light has absolutely nothing to do with the theory of evolution.
The earth's age can be figured by isotope levels of various elements.
That's not even a thing, stupid. Go look what an isotope is in a dictionary.
Scientific evidence supporting Creationism has been dishonestly fabricated
You goddamn WISH you could fabricate some evidence for an intelligent creator, scientific or otherwise. There is NONE.
