Home Archives Random Quotes Latest Comments Top 100 Submit Quote Search Log In

Quote# 8148

The Chinese capsule has landed with parachutes. Why haven't they filmed its landing on the hard ground?
Because no landing has happened.
Chinese astrobuffoons, like Aldrin and Armstrong, have simulated re-entry with that orrible capsule but they have never gone to space.
If NASA buffoons have already been on the moon, why do they want to go there again?
They should send men to Mars.
The problem is always the same: they don't know how to land on Mars without smashing against the ground and how to re-enter in our atmosphere without becoming roast chikens.

breakballs, Skeptic Friends Network 15 Comments [10/18/2005 12:00:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 5
WTF?! || meh
Username:
Comment:



1
Kimball Khan

OH GOD, NOT THE FUNDY RESEARCH. Wait a minute, they don't know what that is. The moon will be a much better space station then anything on earth(less gravitational pull, no atmosphere for air resistance). Going to the moon is partially intended as a steping stone to Mars. Perhaps the Chinese didn't film their landing because they didn't have a recorder on hand; and the only people who don't believe we landed on the moon are people who live in huts in the Southwest and where tin foil hats to keep the government from reading their mind. It is kind of hard to land somewhere without hitting it, and i have seen a ceramic tile demonstration. The guy turns on a blow torch that has a flame of about 2000 degrees fahrenheit, which is about half the heat of reentry, and torches a side of the tile for about a minute. Then he turns off the torch and touches the other side with his bare hand, and doesn't get burned, and reports not have felt anything. breakballs: stop posting your conspiracy theories on non-conspiracy forums, take off the tin foil hat, and get a clue.

10/19/2005 4:29:28 AM

Jesse Custer

I've only seen one picture of the capsule supposedly landing ... and I'll tell you what, it REALLY looked like it was made in Lightwave. I've been working with Lightwave for the past several years, and ... yeah, that really looked like it was faked.

10/19/2005 4:45:49 AM

Darth Wang

Maybe we're not going to Mars because IT'S TOO EXPENSIVE!?

10/19/2005 6:42:24 AM

Blurb

Nah, we're not going to mars 'cause there's no oil.

10/19/2005 2:00:05 PM

Jesse Custer

Yahweh -

like I said, I've only seen one picture of the capsule in the air, and I can't find it again right now ...

the lighting didn't look right, first of all.

Second, (and much more telling), the flames from the retro rockets VERY blatantly screamed \"I'M A VOLUMETRIC LIGHT!!!!\" The shape of them, the color distribution, the variations ... They used a volumetric light with a procedural texture laid over it, but they didn't make the shape of the flame right. A jet of fire is tapered, right? This was a smooth-sided cylinder of light, with a slightly ragged, but still mostly flat, end. That doesn't HAPPEN with real fire.

10/19/2005 3:52:20 PM

Ratman

We're aren't going to Mars because the Greys and the Masons won't let us, a hobo told me us.

10/20/2005 1:14:10 PM

Norseman

Find the picture, please. I'm not opposed to the possibility of the Chinese government fabricating this for propaganda, but I don't see why they would bother to fake it when the real deal is just a matter of money. Furthermore, were I the Chinese government and I were trying to fabricate a rocket launch for propaganda, if I couldn't have artists competent enough to make it pass experts in the US, rather than risk exposure I would just say that no photos will be released.

10/20/2005 8:25:59 PM

Jesse Custer

Norseman-

The picture seems to have vanished from the internet ... I'm getting pissed, I can't find it anywhere! I'm gonna keep looking, though.

10/21/2005 1:57:54 AM

Dr. Shrinker

No religious content- not fundamentalist

This loon could be an atheist for all we know

12/24/2008 8:12:54 PM

Evilutionist

If you've read the bible before why would you want to read it again?

You're an idiot.

5/24/2009 11:02:54 AM

Quantum Mechanic

Curiosity called.

From Mars.

lol

8/15/2012 5:53:55 AM

Anon-e-moose

"The Chinese capsule has landed with parachutes. Why haven't they filmed its landing on the hard ground?
Because no landing has happened. "

Not to 'break your balls' about this, but...:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?gl=GB&v=eoSczhJPscI [/smartarse]

"Aldrin and Armstrong, have simulated re-entry with that orrible capsule but they have never gone to space"

A certain journalist said the same to Dr. Aldrin. He realised how wrong he was, soon after he'd re-entered Reality, as a dentist later had to re-enter his teeth.

"If NASA buffoons have already been on the moon, why do they want to go there again?"

The same reason the US wanted to beat the USSR. Derp.

"They should send men to Mars."

And after she's broken your balls, Princess Celestia should - with one of your bollocks:



[/smartarse II]

"The problem is always the same: they don't know how to land on Mars without smashing against the ground and how to re-enter in our atmosphere without becoming roast chikens."

Curiosity killed the argument. [/smartarse III]

8/15/2012 8:37:46 AM

Kuyohashi

Retrorockets and ceramic plating. That's how.

Also, it would take seven years to send a man to Mars. Not to build a rocket or anything, to actually get there. Mars is a seven year trip. You want to make that trip, locked in an airtight capsule for seven straight years? Add on another seven for the return trip, whoever pulls Mars duty is not seeing the Earth for at least fourteen years.World War 2 didn't last that long. Never mind the money issue, they'd have to load the thing with enough food, water, medicine, toiletries, and sanity-saving luxuries just to make the trip.

5/13/2013 3:05:55 PM

rubber chicken

Besides the existence of Moon rock in labs around the world, the photos of the Apollo landing sites taken by lunar orbiters, the films, the photos, the laser reflectors which exist on the moons surface, the confirmation of the Apollo signals by school children, the silence of the Soviet Union regarding any hoax and the involvement of hundreds of thousands of people in said hoax. You are positing that a Government managed to engineer a flawless operation which has held up for nearly fifty years. A Government ?

5/13/2013 5:52:19 PM



Fundie History: Important people are always fundamentalist, but real heroes are... Chinese? *headdesk*

5/14/2013 4:27:32 PM
1