Here is a link to what scientist think is noah's ark.
Doesn't that prove that us christians are right?
How can one part of the bible be right, noah, and the other just hogwash?
Just a thought
14 comments
Your question is ludicrous. Satan practically invented the art of lying convincingly by spouting truth 99% of the time and using the resulting credibility to make people swallow the following lie.
Besides, we now know that's not Noah's ark. And if it were in fact a big boat, what exactly would prove that it's Noah's big boat?
Again, your desire for this to be the truth doesn't make it so.
It proves nothing. There might well have been some deluded dolt a few thousand years ago, who thought he was doing God's work. He built the ark and then waited and waited and waited for the rain to start flooding the world. But it never came.
As many parts of the Bible contradict each other, some parts must be hogwash. The only alternative to that is that it's all hogwash.
Victorian London existed.
Doesn't that prove that Sherlock Holmes was real?
How can one part of the Sherlock Holmes Novels be right (London existed, people drove around in horse-drawn cabs etc.), and the other part just hogwash?
"Doesn't that prove that us christians are right?
How can one part of the bible be right, noah, and the other just hogwash?
Just a thought"
NoBrainedLady, meet Orange Wizard:
http://www.fstdt.net/QuoteComment.aspx?QID=82750&Page=1
Birdbrains of a feather get annihilated together.
Most of your lot accepts "micro-evolution" but does not accept, "macro-evolution." How can one part of evolution be right and the other just hogwash?
No, really, tell me. I've asked that question to creationists repeatedly and I have yet to receive a credible answer.
Ofg all the hogwash you idiots believe, the story of Noah's ark is right up there with the most ridiculous. It is simply impossible, physically, geologically, or even logically, for it to have ever happened.
So while the ruins of ancient wooden ships may well still await discovery, there's no chance that one of them carried two of evfery animal in existence, plus all the food they would have required, etc.
Really, there are more sensible childrens' stories than this.
Oh, I hate "scientist" so much. He talks shit beyond belief. Can somebody tell these guys that "scientist" is a liar, who makes stuff up to appease a religious belief? He's part of your group, "scientist" is, someone who insists proof isn't needed or desired or somehow suspect.
Now scientist as in: Educated person who follows the scientific method, that's who has some credance. Your side has one I've seen, Behe, someone with proper credentials who has actually sold out, abandoned many of the principals and has lost credibility thereof.
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.