Quote# 82959

The [Norwegian] bomb wasn't filmed when it went off, if it was, the horseplay would be called out right away.... as a planned event.

The only explanation for this video is they were simulating what it would look like.

Although, a simulation like this would take almost zero time to put together. It's not a simulation that should be told to the masses as truth.

I see both sides of this, people want to see what happened. TV networks want to have that sacred footage so they can increase revenue by viewers. They make a simulation and claim its real.

There is little money to be made in actually killing people, there is a lot of money to be made in advertising.


litterbaux, Above Top Secret 14 Comments [8/1/2011 3:18:28 AM]
Fundie Index: 23

Username  (Login)
Comment  (Text formatting help) 

1 | bottom


Yes they simulated what it would look like by blowing up the actual government building and killing people. Duhhh...

8/1/2011 4:39:00 AM


Nothing is real! Nothing is true! Hide under your beds, the sky is falling in! Stop breathing, the air is contaminated!

No, seriously, stop breathing.

8/1/2011 4:47:24 AM

In that case, they did a great job faking, along with that, his stupid manifesto and the warning of the Polish authorities.

8/1/2011 4:49:25 AM


So now all that has to be accounted for is the hundreds of actual Norwegians that were in Oslo when the bomb exploded, and the families of the shooting victims who, obviously coincidentally, have never returned home.

I mean seriously, do you people even fucking think? Fuck you and your cheapening of tragedies to meet your own sociopathic madness.

8/1/2011 5:31:53 AM

Whiskey Tango Foxtrot

At the beginning of the video it states the pics have been altered. Maybe it's a conspiracy to crate a conspiracy. Maybe they want all the conspiracy theorists to finally be driven over the edge and go underground never to be seen again.
Or maybe you need more meds.

8/1/2011 7:40:21 AM

Doubting Thomas

And the thing is, if someone did happen to have a camera running when the bomb went off, all the conspiracy nuts would be questioning how convenient it was that someone got it on tape, so it must have been a planned event.

And while the "video" was indeed faked, I blame it on sloppy journalism.

8/1/2011 7:43:42 AM


Oh no, a news office uses a simulation to illustrate what happened!

8/1/2011 10:06:04 AM

Brendan Rizzo

What part of, "Breivik admitted it" do you not understand?!

8/1/2011 6:05:37 PM

Raised by Horses

And we never did land on the moon neither, no sir.


8/1/2011 6:34:37 PM


And all the dead bodies were just holograms. Unbelievable what a laptop PC using Win 7 can do.

8/3/2011 10:24:30 PM


this is the twenty first century, everyone has a fuking cameraphone, get over it

8/5/2011 9:22:05 AM


litterbaux is full of shit.

8/13/2011 10:43:43 PM

I love the Conspiracy Paradox.

On the one hand, if something happens, such as a bomb going off or a plane flying into a building, that I did not see with my very own eyes, it did not happen. Videos, eyewitness testimony, every sort of evidence has been planted by a conspiracy. I will claim to be merely a skeptical observer, waiting until all the facts are in, before jumping to conclusions.

On the other hand, if I read a book about how the pyramids were built by aliens, how Atlantis was destroyed by a nuke, and how Sasquatch made the Nazsca Lines, than, by gum, I am going to believe that without question!

8/18/2011 4:22:51 PM



When you think about it there really isn't much of a paradox. Most conspiracists reject the "official" explanation of things so regardless of facts they glom on to various alternative beliefs claiming that any explanation from the mainstream is inherently corrupt and can not be believed.

Also, not all conspiracists believe the same things. Somebody could believe in the existence of bigfoot and chupicabras but think that 9/11 Truthers and birthers are crazy.

8/20/2011 3:00:43 PM

1 | top: comments page