Have to know that people are susceptible to the avalanche of propaganda produced daily in all forms of secular media to force the pro-gay agenda onto people.
41 comments
I doubt if the Allies beating the Nazis in WW2 will be seen as anything but the good side lost.
The rest of the post is typical crying about gay rights and slippery slope, but this is what makes it truly WTF territory. You honestly think that people are going to start seeing the Nazis as the good guys?!? There's more of a chance that the US will be seen as a pacifist country than of Europe loving the Nazis.
"I doubt if the Allies beating the Nazis in WW2 will be seen as anything but the good side lost. "
I'm confused. Is the raging murderer gay SS the good side, or is it the regime that sent gays to death camps the good side? You fundies never explain these things.
You definitely fail at the "wise" part. This makes no sense at all. However, it belongs in CSTDT, not FSTDT.
Hey Headache, are you going to bash every Finnish person in the world, because of what this one moron says? Come on now!
Yes, history forevermore shall see the swastika as a symbol of altruism, virtue, and family.
The Nazis will be remembered as optimistic idealists, hoping against hope that they could fix our broken little world and make it a better place.
Oh, wait, you're full of SHIT!
The first line is not a sentence. therefore it makes no sense.
Second line is bullshit.
Third line is praise for the most evil beings that ever walked the face of the planet.
Who was free in 1930s/1940s continental Europe?
How can you people be so dedicatedly stupid?
@Alencon
Quite simple, really. The pro-gay agenda is as follows:
#1: To reveal to the world that THIS
image
exists somewhere out there.
#2: To reveal TO OUR CHILDREN that gay people exist and have made """contributions""" to the world in SPITE of being GAY.
#3: To fool the world into thinking that these creatures are worthy of tolerance and are trustworthy enough to leave children alone with.
#4: To steal all the straight people's marriages and give them to the Gays. This is their ultimate goal, and to do so they need to either steal the license and cross out the couple's name, writing in their own(presumably in blood, over a pentagram), OR by tempting away a spouse into the Gay.
A strange attempt at associating together what the writer considers to be bad things with actual bad things, as though they were all identical. Gayness, paedophilia, euthanasia, Nazis. All these things are bad, therefore they must all be related, thinks be free be wise.
@farpadokly
Michelle Bachmann, Rick Santorum, Rick Perry, hell, all the Republicans running for the office of PRESIDENT would disagree with you.
This is how they view Teh Gheyz:image
@J. James
DUDE. Animated gif. My eyes... *frantically scrolls up*
In all seriousness, I don't know where they get this whole "gay nazi" thing from, they killed us too :/
edit: I see my comment made the page roll over, nevermind about the scrolling up and whatnot.
If the Axis had won WWII then we wouldn't know about ToE, all the books would have been burned. It would also have been a crime to be homosexual, Communist, atheist, non-Caucasian, and we'd all be speaking German instead of English.
So no; the Allies beating the Axis was indeed not "the good side lost".
What is this "pro-gay agenda"? All I hear and see are normal human being living normal lives, minding their own business. The only weeny difference is that the couples have the same gender.
Homosexuality harms no-one. Pedophilia definitely harms the victims, and euthanasia is potentially harmful.
paedophilia results in uninformed and thus non-consensual sex. Not the same as gay lovin'.
The right to take your own life based on informed consent is something I think everyone should have a right to. If I want to die and the method I use is not detrimental to others around me, then that is my prerogative.
"It is only a matter of a decade or most two, before we see throughout Europe the same acceptance for paedophilia"
Somehow, I doubt that:
image
[/Reverse Godwin]
"I doubt if the Allies beating the Nazis in WW2 will be seen as anything but the good side lost."
'History will be kind to me. For I intend to write it!'
-Winston Churchill (and he did! His writings are considered by literary scholars as the definitive histories of the 20th Century)
Ah, Godwin's Law. And a slippery slope, too. Typical, typical...
It's pretty rare to see a fundie from a Nordic country, all things considered... WAIT A MINUTE! This website is called "Finland for thought"... wasn't Finland on the side of the Nazis during the war?!
@Brendan Rizzo: Finland was *co-belligerent* with the Nazis in the fight against *Soviet Russia only* because the Russians had *stolen Finnish land* in the peace treaty concluding the Winter War, while the Western allies ignored Finnish pleas for aid. Finland's co-belligerency with the Nazis against the Bolsheviks was no more indicative of support for Nazism than Winston Churchill's co-belligerency with the Bolsheviks against the Nazis was indicative of support for Bolshevism. Jewish officers commanded Finnish troops throughout the Continuation War (and some were even offered the Iron Cross by the German government, out of confusion or a sense of political obligation - needless to say, they declined). The only Jews handed over to the Nazis were those taken fighting for the Soviets (which, given the circumstances, was far more reasonable, if not commendable, than Western Allied compliance with the terms of the Yalta Agreement following the war (see: Operation Keelhaul)) or those who (a) were refugees and (b) committed crimes against Finnish citizens at a time when the whole nation was perilously close to starvation.
Only the use of the word secular makes this religiously fundie. Just.
The "Nazis were right" comment is refreshingly different though, in a crazy disgusting kind of way.
Why an I commenting on a Godwin anyway?
And by the way, we don't want paedophilia to be accepted in europe. Kiddie fiddlers are the lowest of the low on a power trip. Stop conflating homosexuality with paedophilia, please.
Euthanasia on the other hand should be available to people who want it. The Dignitas clinic in Switzerland is a shining example.
And lastly, Fuck You!
@1320942: Do you fucking read previous comments, you waste of flesh? No, of course not; why see if anyone has already said the same thing - or rebutted it - before spewing your idiocy onto the 'net?
Finland attacked the Bolshevik scum of Soviet Russia with Nazi assistance in an attempt to retake the lands that had been stolen from them in a war of Bolshevik aggression while the Western Allies refused to offer real aid, but schemed to try to twist the situation to tactical advantage. Finnish troops only fought on the Finno-Russian front, and Finland never implemented Nazi racial policies. There's a reason that Britain, though nominally at war with Finland in support of their Soviet allies, never actually attacked the Finns, beyond bombing a few *German* ships while they were in a Finnish harbor.
@ christopher:
Oh, the double standard here. I love how you go to every possible length to exonerate your precious European countries. Finland was on Germany's side in the war, get over it. I am positive that had the US been in the exact position that Finland had been, that nowadays you'd be decrying the US for siding with the Nazis, but since a European country did it you have to make them look blameless at all costs. You don't side with the Nazis, after all. We have every right to criticize the state of Finland for that. It just infuriates me that every single time the US does anything, it gets bashed, but when a European country does something like this everyone on the Internet rushes to its aid. Fucking double standards.
@Brendan: I'm American, and I challenge you to find any evidence that I apply a harsher standard to the US than to European nations. Also, "you just don't side with Stalinists, after all." Why should that position be more flexible than the other? Finland was attacked by totalitarians, while fellow democracies did nothing, and forced to make enormous concessions to prevent their nation from being destroyed entirely. Later, they cooperated with another group of totalitarians in attacking the first group only - Finns never fought anyone but Soviets. How is that morally wrong?
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.
