Quote# 83496

[The rest of the brochure is equally disturbing]

Homosexuality, Islam, and abortion have
something in common. They are three
different colored gloves covering the same
fist. Abortion is a crimson glove (stained
with the blood of our pre-born children).
Homosexuality is a pink glove (stained with
the blood of young men and women given
over to their own lust, and stained with the
blood of nations that approve of such
behavior). Islam is a black glove (stained
with the blood of Christians, Jews, and
anyone else who dares disagree with the false
“god” Allah and his demon possessed
prophet Mohammed). Three different
colored gloves, yet the same fist. It is the fist
of him who robs, kills, and destroys. That’s
right, I’m talking about the devil himself!
We are not unaware of his schemes.

Operation Save America, Operation Save America 78 Comments [8/30/2011 3:37:52 AM]
Fundie Index: 87
Submitted By: Evelyn

Username  (Login)
Comment  (Text formatting help) 

1 2 3 4 | bottom


Waddaminnit...LGBTs have pink blood? Muslims have black blood? You are really, really one strange person!

Now, is this a glove on one hand? Is this three gloves? Is this one glove with red, pink & black fingers?

Either way, 'Operation Screw America', it's a crappy analogy & you're a jackass, thank you.

8/30/2011 6:28:38 PM


Danarth, got it. I just didn't like the look of it or the packaging you posted. Kind of dark.

8/30/2011 7:26:16 PM


"Homosexuality, Islam, and abortion have"

You lost me there. You fundies seriously need to change the record once in a while. I liked it so much better when you all went on about the evils of rock music.

Yeah, I'm getting a little jaded here. :p

8/30/2011 8:30:48 PM


...o0 I do not bleed pink. Just sayin'.

8/30/2011 8:50:25 PM

Argle Bargle

The old "anything I don't like or understand is of the Devil" spiel. Yawn.

8/31/2011 6:01:57 AM


Kids, this is why you don't huff paint

8/31/2011 7:07:31 AM


"Homosexuality, Islam, and abortion have
something in common. They are three
different colored gloves covering the same

So homosexuality, Islam & abortion are evils that are all exactly the same: Rigid. Unbending. Equal.

Okay. So try putting on three hand coverings that are made of a solid material; say, metal (like a gauntlet used in knights armour, but without the joints & hinges), and are all exactly the same size.


Moral: Metaphor =/= Reality. Just like your Bible, eh?


(emphasis added):


It's both. It was an type of controller for the Nintendo which didn't work very well.

Now, how is it you managed to phrase a reasonable question with a stupid statement ?"

(*Switches to Doug Piranha mode*):

Oh look. The proven Poe:



has come here with what she thinks is an 'opinion'.

Because anyone who dares to call themself a Christian always obeys the 9th Commandment. Isn't that right, dearie?

8/31/2011 8:37:09 AM

Welp, harassing random individuals with religious bullshit and spreading brochures of this shit that are mostly found in trashcans sure helps.

Its like trying to remove lumps from mash potatoes by throwing individual potatoes through a blender and mashing rest with a spoon.

8/31/2011 9:00:02 AM


No. The only thing they really have in common is that you don't care for any of them.

8/31/2011 10:41:52 AM


The Power Glove I posted was the Japanese one (sadly, it's not actually shiny like in the ad.)
Here's the American one:

8/31/2011 6:44:53 PM


That one's better looking. I'm sure it's a fine toy.

8/31/2011 7:08:38 PM


There is blood with any surgery. It's not different just because it's something you don't like.

But heterosexuals who have sex aren't giving themselves over to lust?

Lastly, no Christians have ever killed anyone, right?

In conclusion, fuck you.

8/31/2011 8:31:17 PM


It SHOULD have been a fine toy, but it wasn't. It was cumbersome and frustrating to use, the controls responded poorly, and having to pre-progam the button setup for each game was incredibly tedious. If you've seen the Angry Video Game Nerd's review of it, you have an idea of how bad it was.

Also: pink blood? WTF?!

8/31/2011 8:43:11 PM

The Jamo

Wow, thanks for that. Now for something completely different and equally useless: a Kintted Gas Mask!

8/31/2011 10:32:05 PM


furbear, sorry to hear that, sounds like a drag. i'll pray things get better.

8/31/2011 10:38:29 PM


Wait--pink comes from red and white. Where does the white come from? HUH?

9/1/2011 2:00:57 AM



"Wait--pink comes from red and white. Where does the white come from? HUH?"

And it's right-wing Fundamentalist Christians who say 'These colours don't run', eh? I'm just surprised that, with their paranoia at the time, resulting in the need to put on their money 'In God We Trust', as a result of the zenith of the Cold War, that they kept the red in the Stars & Stripes. 'Red Scare' in the 1950s, and all that jazz.

Yet, pre-1954 (as per the reverse of the 1952 issue $5 note):

...they couldn't have given a flying fuck about God, eh? Oh, the irony. Oh, the hypocrisy. Oh, the SHAME!

9/1/2011 8:11:42 AM


Moose, I admit that the comment about the demon's finger going into the sinner's rear end was from me. I was miffed and shouldn't have said it and I tried to cover my sin with a lie. I apologize and ask you to forgive me.

However, the second comment, about wood, was indeed from a troll, not me.

9/1/2011 5:22:06 PM


Look, His4Life, everybody knows you're a Poe. You ain't even funny anymore, so please fuck off.

9/2/2011 6:44:20 AM



"However, the second comment, about wood, was indeed from a troll, not me."




I suggest you read the story of "The Boy Who Cried Wolf", dearie.

All it takes is for our admin Distind to do an IP trace. Oh, and re. that previous thread; second comment (about wood) you say...?:



"That previous remark about erections did not come from me. I don't know who is impersonating me here. Their position is not Biblical. Sex is blessed by God, but it has a proper context according to the Biblical worldview - the marital relationship. Christianity does not teach that it is sinful for a man to have an erection."


"@The Jamo

The origin of the erection is in Original Sin. Before the Fall, if Adam and Eve got around to procreating, they would have done so without an erection and without pleasure. But now procreation has been corrupted, and people even perform the action with no intent of making babies. But the deed is always sinful which is why we need Jesus."

I'm not exactly a Professor of Mathematics, but even I can see that 1324468 comes after 1324170. Never mind confusing me, you're confusing yourself. Or is neither post from you? Again, all it'll take is for Distind to do an IP trace on the above posts, relative to yours now. I refer you to this thread:


Conclusion: You're one of three things:

1- Schizophrenic. Why aren't you taking your meds?
2- A liar (PROTIP: 9th Commandment. Thus, as a Christian, you're going to Hell)
3- A troll/poe/whatever - Thus you've proven that you're no more religious than Richard Dawkins. And even he would never resort to your form of pathetic behaviour.

Either way, your failure is now complete.


"Look, His4Life, everybody knows you're a Poe. You ain't even funny anymore, so please fuck off."

She's now shown herself in her true light: a sad, pathetic attention seeker.

9/2/2011 6:59:06 AM


"Before the Fall, if Adam and Eve got around to procreating, they would have done so without an erection and without pleasure."
Now I'm getting a mental image of Adam budding like a sea sponge...

9/2/2011 9:52:08 AM


You guys are being unduly harsh to me because I am a believer in Christ. I admitted my idiotic mistake in making a crude comment and then trying to cover it up afterwards, but that does not mean I'm not a Christian or doing my best to follow Jesus. I'm sorry - the comment was out of line and my attempt to lie and cover it up was even more inappropriate. However, the second comment about the erection was truly not from me, and you are welcome to trace the IP address to prove it. There is a difference in that while the first comment was me spouting off in frustration, the second is clearly someone attempting to make me look stupid. Obviously I know that the question about evolution and wood is not about a man's penis, and I do not believe and never have believed that the Bible teaches that it is a sin for a man to have an erection. That is absolutely ridiculous.

Yes, I have damaged my credibility here and I deserve your rebuke. However, my comment, while an exaggeration, was biblically based, as the Book of Daniel does teach that the unsaved will be sodomized on the day of judgmenet. The second comment (about "wood") was not biblically based and was nonsensical.

I am sorry. I know who and what I am - a wretch in the eyes of God, even though a wretch forgiven - and I am woman enough to admit it. I hope you can forgive me. I don't think there is anything more I can say or do in relation to your comment, anon-e-moose.

9/2/2011 1:03:40 PM

Professor M

@ His4Life --

People aren't being harsh because you're a Christian. Hell, there are some Christians among FSTDTers. We're being harsh because you're full of shit, hypocritical, and a genuinely horrifying theocratic mess. You're not even a "Bible-believing" Christian in the literal sense -- you're a militant right-wing autocrat who uses a set of bizarre reinterpretations of archaic religious texts to justify your right-wing autocratic positions.

9/2/2011 3:32:45 PM


Ok, give me an example of how I misinterpret the Bible.

9/2/2011 4:25:13 PM



"Ok, give me an example of how I misinterpret the Bible."

Oh, you don't need to:


...it misinterprets itself.

But then, what should we expect from something that shapes the mindsets of right-wing Fundamentalist Christians? Their very own 'Word of God' is chock-full of lies. And not only lies, neither:

Jim Bakker. Jimmy Swaggart. Ted Faggard. Kent Hovind. Tony Alamo. The list goes on...:


And it's we Atheists who are supposed to be the depraved, amoral sinners?! Matthew 7:1 ring any bells?

Put your own house in order*, right-wing Fundamentalist Christians, before you can even think you have the right to have so much as an 'opinion' about the activities & lifestyles of others.

'Grace through faith'? 'OSAS'? Oh yes, the preferred doctrine(s) of the right-wing Fundamentalist Christian. It basically gives them carte blanche to continue to be an unjustifiable douchebag cunt, under the facade of still considering themselves 'Saved'. PROTIP: James 2:26. Which means that those who claim to be 'Saved', by definition - and by virtue of their own religious doctrine - has no right whatsoever to even think about lying (9th Commandment, and all that jazz). Thus one who claims to be 'saved', yet lies - and continually does so - isn't saved after all.

Therefore you forfeit the right to be respected, never mind listened to. Least of all think you have the right to condemn and/or be judgemental against others. Like I say: Matthew 7:1.

Consider that, the next time you even think of condemning we Atheists to that so-called 'Hell'.

*- Ah, but if there were ruthless, merciless, hyper-savage, 'guilty until proven innocent' McCarthy-esque witchhunts & show-trials against fundie preachers, pastors etc, to purge any heretic sinners - which spread further to believers as a whole, there would be no right-wing Fundamentalist Christianity left in the US.

Yet, it's they who dare to think that they have the right to be McCarthyistic about anyone else not exactly like them. Oh, the doublethink. Oh, the hypocrisy. Oh, the SHAME!

9/3/2011 11:13:19 AM

1 2 3 4 | top: comments page