i wonder how long it will be before the 'gay' cheerleaders come to whine over this. banning homos from the priesthood is almost the same as banning pedophiles . wacko jacko is a homo so that proves the theory homos are more then likely to be pedophiles .
33 comments
Pat Robertson said New Orleans deserved what it got, therefore, all christians are prejudice, ignorant retards. Wow! This IS easy!
Excellent example of fundie logic and science..someone notify the Discovery Institute so we can get this gem in print! So how does the gay marriage thingy destroy the family? Will all hetero marriages dissolve because all the spouses in hetero marriages wanted same sex marriages when they married, but they weren't legal at the time?
I bow before your obviously superior wit and intellect, Mr. *. Any other pearls of wisdom you care to share?
(Nope, couldn't keep a straight face while typing it. Had to see if I could pull it off, though.)
People really like saying "Go to Hell!" a lot.I wonder if they really understand what the concept "Hell" really means in the whole Judeo-christian mythology ?
At it's basic level, it's simply another land of the Dead, much like Hades, or Hel.A static, unchanging, unconscious place."Burning Eternal" simply meant "Cleansed until it is finished".I guess that's what's meant by The Idea that almost all will be like children when they enter into heaven. -My two bits.
As for most pedophiles being Homosexual.that is untrue, even when using the most conservative of numbers regarding Homosexuals as a part of the population(o.5-1%).Almost overwhemingly,it is Heterosexuals who assault male or female prepubescent children.Interestingly,Prepubescent children are raped almost equally by men and women. Postpubescent children are often willing partners in sex and are quiet and/or undercounted.(Minor females usually have sex with much older males)Minor males usually exchange sexual favors with older (chickenhawks)men and sometimes women for access to drugs,alcohol,money,or even women.This whole field is understandably understudied as it's rather unsavory(My unfortunate humanity showing) topic.
-My two bits
Because a single, deliberately selected sample is always perfectly representative of a random population with millions of potential candidates.
::Points to Logic textbook::
Class, can we say "material falacy of hasty generalization?"
It's all the liberals and gays fault!
image
I love the very next post in this thread too:
"""Liberal said: "This looks like a diversionary tactic to deflect public attention away from the Vatican's real problem which is child sex abuse by clergy,"
The Vatican document is actually aimed at solving that issue. heterosexual men do not molest kids, homosexual men do."""
:) lol
Micheal Jackson is a pedophile, not a homosexual, stop confusing us.
Now tell me how a homosexual is on the same tier as a pedophile. You'll get bonus points if you use actual facts.
Except that the church DOESN'T ban pedophiles. It just moves them around and refuses to punish them.
edit: That could have been taken the wrong way. Would just like to reiterate that gays do not equal pedophiles.
Now mention just how we would notice the difference between Gay Whiney Cheerleaders from you attention seeking conservatives.
Because I've noticed more noise from Right-wing conservatives who are more often pedofiles than I've heard from the gay community.
http://partners.nytimes.com/library/politics/camp/061000wh-bush.html (emphasis added):
'Perhaps there have been other presidential candidates who have dressed in drag, flaunting their legs from beneath a (fairly short) white skirt. But George W. Bush is probably the only one who has done it in front of a camera.
A photograph showing George and friends wearing wigs and employing falsies to fill out their sweaters ' (see link)
'George chose team names for their appeal to adolescent tastes. There were the Nads, so that fans could scream "Go, Nads! "'
So... 'i wonder how long it will be before the 'gay' cheerleaders come to whine over this', you say? Well considering that the above example was from the early-mid 1960s: the past , You tell me, Repubican_Legion, who doesn't even have a forum - post-Freak Cuntservatives: Whore Lie-Party Smells, thus the only ones whining are yourselves: and not just because you no longer have a place to circlejerk, neither. [/Duckturd Dumb]
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.