1 2
#1343001
Bollox
There are literally thousands of examples of ancient art showing man lived with dinosaurs
No, there isn't.
10/23/2011 4:48:11 AM
#1343005
storymoron
Job is NOT to be taken literally.
...he was also a poor magician--er, illusionist.
10/23/2011 5:15:23 AM
#1343006
Imsety
Telling people to google something is a bad idea if the first hit immediately exposes your entire argument as bullshit.
Looks like the Ica Stones were made by Peruvian locals interested in making a bit of money on the side, selling forged artifacts to clueless tourists.
10/23/2011 5:15:55 AM
#1343026
LAchlan
The Flintstones isn't a documentary. You do realise this, don't you?
10/23/2011 6:00:44 AM
#1343037
Berny
No, there simply isn't. Besides, artwork is not evidence at all otherwise we'd believe there were unicorns and dragons and goat-footed flute touting creatures out there.
The nail in your creationist coffin is that nowhere on this planet have animals ever been found fossilized out of chronological order. No bunnies in the Jurassic.
Oh, and Google "ica stones" and "hoax". The damn thing were carved with a dentists drill. They are all obvious forgeries.
Damn, but you creationists fall for shit like that all the time. Would you like to buy a piece of Noah's Ark?
10/23/2011 6:27:46 AM
#1343043
TGRwulf
"have been found the footprints of man and dinosaurs found preserved together in several different locations."
O RLY?
10/23/2011 6:32:04 AM
#1343045
And don't forget the evidence about titans, nymphs and geenies in bottles.
10/23/2011 6:34:33 AM
#1343052
mAX
The Ica stones have been proven fake. A local farmer made them to sell to tourists. I thought only Noah and his family survived the flood?
10/23/2011 6:44:27 AM
#1343063
Percy Q. Shunn
Like this?
10/23/2011 7:06:23 AM
#1343070
Man certainly lived with very large animals only a few thousand years ago. Still more thousands than your Bible suggests, but recent in geological time. And whales are still pretty leviathany today. Maybe that explains your "evidence".
PS The Paluxy tracks are
bunk.
10/23/2011 7:18:06 AM
#1343099
Doubting Thomas
There are literally thousands of examples of ancient art showing man lived with dinosaurs.
Ancient art =/= historical documentation.
It is probable Job lived well over 200 years and lived not long after the flood.
No, it's not.
Google "Ica Stones" to see photos of thousands of ancient stones found in South America with detailed carvings of dinosaurs, even showing that some were tamed and ridden by man!
Ica Stones are carved by modern artists & sold to tourists.
10/23/2011 8:14:14 AM
#1343102
Swede
Art is not evidence. The Bible is evidence of coexistence with dinosaurs, just as much as The Chamber of Secret is evidence of the existence of basilisks.
Nope, I won't be googling "Ica stones". ICA is a large food-store chain in Sweden; I guess I will get mostly links to them. They do sometimes sell stones with detailed carvings on them, though. The carvings mostly say things like "Love", "Take it easy" and "Anna", "Helena", "Maria" etc.
10/23/2011 8:17:27 AM
#1343104
John
So, there is much evidence, even in the Bible that man lived with dinosaurs.
It's pretty unlikely, but so what? Man lived with coelacanths, too, although we didn't know it until 1938, when one was found alive and healthy after apparently having vanished along with the dinosaurs 65 million years ago.
10/23/2011 8:24:25 AM
#1343112
Hakar
Isn't it amazing how in Fundieland there's somehow tons and tons of evidence for humans and dinosaurs living together yet absolutely none whatsoever that proves the theory of evolution?
10/23/2011 8:51:03 AM
#1343120
SpukiKitty
THE ICA STONES WERE A HOAX YOU DINGLEBERRY!!!!
10/23/2011 9:05:47 AM
#1343129
Nicole
No, there is only artwork that vaguely resemble dinosaurs if you squint your eyes and tilt your head.
And the Ica Stones are a hoax.
10/23/2011 9:38:14 AM
#1343131
nazani14
What about all the small dinosaurs? Wouldn't they have more likely to survive longer than the ones that needed tons of food? why is there no mention of them in the Bible or anywhere else?
10/23/2011 9:39:01 AM
#1343136
Anon-e-moose
PROTIP: "The Flintstones", "Jurassic Park" and "Terra Nova" are not documentaries.
10/23/2011 9:47:43 AM
#1343143
A bad carving of an alpaca is not evidence for living dinosaur.
Dinosaurs do live among us. We call them birds.
10/23/2011 9:59:19 AM
#1343153
"There is art from Babylonia showing what we used to call a Brontosaurus, I forget the modern name. This is very likely the Behemoth described in Job with a tail like a cedar tree that drank up rivers."
In context, the "tail" is it's fucking dick! Sure as fuck doesn't sound like a Brontosaurus, does it? (pro-tip... best fit is an elephant)
10/23/2011 10:16:24 AM
#1343159
Papabear
I've seen drawings and paintings of St. George slaying a dragon but it doesn't mean that it's a trustworthy historical reference. Ica stones have long been discredited.
10/23/2011 10:26:50 AM
#1343164
aaa
Just more rectally gathered anecdotes from people without a damn clue. Nothing i haven't seen before.
10/23/2011 10:32:43 AM
#1343186
Headache
Your nick is "Winman"? Really? With this post you need to change it to "Failman"!
10/23/2011 11:01:28 AM
#1343196
Have you actually done any research to back up your claims instead of just listening to word of mouth rumors spread around by your friends.
10/23/2011 11:18:32 AM
#1343212
checkmate
Most scholars believe Job the oldest book in the Bible because of his long lifespan (Job 42:16).
Really, then why is Job written in a post-exile Hebrew dialect that is heavily influenced by Aramaic, making it one of the younger books?
Oh wait, I forgot, you can't know that because you only read the Bible in God's own KJV.
Why don't the fundies bother learning Biblical Hebrew? It's not really very difficult.
10/23/2011 11:50:05 AM
1 2