Home Archives Random Quotes Latest Comments Top 100 Submit Quote Search Log In

Quote# 84449

Homosexual “marriage” is such a silly concept, since it is only about validating urges of putting one’s body parts or other objects into cavities that only produce disease and nihilism. For homosexuals demanding the ability to redefine thousands of years of tradition by calling their sick relationships—”marriage” to validate vile, demeaning acts and urges perpetrated on a human being and call it “love” is beyond rational thinking and should be discouraged through the legal system.

You have numerous cases of real “love” which doesn’t demand defiling bodies for ones lust—such as the love of a mother for her child. There need not be any laws demanding they be allowed to get “married”.

Forcing others to validate such sick, demeaning behaviors is unconstitutional and destroys the concept of our Constitution—that there are laws of nature and nature’s God—where our Natural Rights are given. We can not allow an atheist, Satanic view of the human body to destroy the concepts of the Constitution.

The stupidity of the left is beyond belief....all their ideas are bankrupt and if debate is allowed (political correctness is Marxism) they would be in the ash heap of history.

savagesusie, Free Republic 91 Comments [10/24/2011 3:35:08 AM]
Fundie Index: 103
WTF?! || meh
Username:
Comment:



1 2 3 4


No, it's not. It's equality. All your arguments were used against inter-ethnic marriages. They were just as wrong then as they are now.

10/24/2011 3:52:24 AM

Itachirumon

Hey, SavageSusie

Gay people exist, their love is real, marriage equality will happen within the decade, if not within the next 5 years. You lose.

if my calculations are correct, your worthless waste-of-space-and-oxygen brain just exploded.

Good, at least the plants can get some food, thus, serving your purpose at last.

10/24/2011 3:56:47 AM

Veras_the_Brujah

Can anyone else always identify a savagesusie quote before even checking the name?

10/24/2011 3:59:13 AM



This thundercunt sure loves to use "lust" alot.

It's a aged closeted yaoi fangirl.

10/24/2011 4:13:33 AM

Bollox

Buttsex produced nihilism? What does cunnilingus produce, anarcho-syndicalism?

10/24/2011 4:14:22 AM

A. Person

Heterosexual “marriage” is such a silly concept, since it is only about validating urges of putting one’s body parts or other objects into cavities that only produce disease and overpopulation. For heterosexuals demanding the ability to crowd the earth with people it can't sustain by calling their sick relationships—”marriage” to validate vile, demeaning acts and urges perpetrated on a human being and call it “love” is beyond rational thinking and should be discouraged through the legal system.

You have numerous cases of real “love” which doesn’t demand defiling the earth for ones lust—such as the love of a man for another man. There need not be any laws demanding they be allowed to get “married”.

Forcing others to validate such sick, demeaning behaviors is unconstitutional and destroys the concept of our Constitution—that there are laws of nature where our Natural Rights are given. We can not allow a narrow-minded, Satanic view of the human body to destroy the concepts of the Constitution.

The stupidity of the right is beyond belief....all their ideas are bankrupt and if debate is allowed (political censorship is conservatism) they would be in the ash heap of history.

10/24/2011 4:20:47 AM

A. Person

(deleted. double post)

10/24/2011 4:21:43 AM

shykid

@Veras_the_Brujah: Yes. My susie senses started tingling when I got to "nihilism." I glanced down to check, and sure enough, it was her.

10/24/2011 4:33:15 AM

Swede

The acts themselves are "sex", the feeling of deep mutual affection is "love".
I didn't know the mouth produced nothing but disease and nihilism. Oh, you're thinking about your own speeches? Then you're absolutely right.

Many heterosexual people have anal and/or oral sex, too, ya know. I'd guess not that many lesbians have anal sex, but what do I know.

Should heterosexual people only be allowed to marry if they promise never to have anything but vaginal sex? It seems it's the anal sex you're not liking. Not all gay guys practice anal sex, stupid.

Your Constituion surely says nothing about laws of God's nature?
Not all atheists nor all satanists are homosexuals. Nor all Socialists, either, btw.

10/24/2011 4:45:10 AM



Wow. She's not even SAYING anything. It's just like a verbal diarrhoea of fundie-Christian buzzwords.

10/24/2011 5:00:52 AM



Why do I picture Jabba the Hutt when I see her "savagesusie" user name?

10/24/2011 5:06:15 AM

nkd

susie seems to be getting off on her description of homosexuals, doesn't she? She goes int GREAT detail about the sexual part of relationships while minimizing love, care, support, committment. Bet she is a Rick Santorum suporter.

10/24/2011 5:31:12 AM

Arctic Knight

Preventing gay marriage is unconstitutional. The 14th Amendment, known as the Equal Protection Clause, guarantees equal protection for everyone. Because I'm a man, I can marry a woman, however, based solely on my sex I am not allowed the same right as my wife to marry a man. That is sexual discrimination and violates the Constitution.

10/24/2011 5:32:42 AM

mister Spak



10/24/2011 5:34:42 AM

Big One

Same old bullshit about gay mariage.

Same old answer about should we let infertile people marry.

@Veras_the_Brujah : Sorry, the only superpower of this kind I'm allowed is guessing that the post comes from Rapture Ready before the end of the first line. I must be out of shape.

10/24/2011 5:37:34 AM



For a while now I've wanted meet savagesusie at a dinner party. I'd love to know how her everyday conversation compares to her FR drivel, and whether she really is that bigotted and ignorant 24/7.

10/24/2011 5:43:29 AM

Noneofyourbusiness

What exactly, makes this person think homosexual sex acts are more damaging to the body than heterosexual? Have they even heard of lube?

10/24/2011 6:13:47 AM

Doubting Thomas

calling their sick relationships—”marriage” to validate vile, demeaning acts and urges perpetrated on a human being and call it “love”

I love how their arguments against gay marriage could easily be turned around against straight marriage.

10/24/2011 6:23:22 AM

TGRwulf

It's about equality. Also, "traditonal" marriage isn't as traditional as you think it is.

10/24/2011 6:33:38 AM

dionysus

Homosexual “marriage” is such a silly concept, since it is only about validating urges of putting one’s body parts or other objects into cavities that only produce disease and nihilism

The gays are fucking your skull?

For homosexuals demanding the ability to redefine thousands of years of tradition

Slavery had thousands of years of tradition. I guess it was "silly" to emancipate all of those slaves.

to validate vile, demeaning acts and urges perpetrated on a human being and call it “love” is beyond rational thinking and should be discouraged through the legal system

Yeah, I know. But because of the first amendment we can't ban fundies from expressing their Christian "love".

Forcing others to validate such sick, demeaning behaviors is unconstitutional and destroys the concept of our Constitution—that there are laws of nature and nature’s God

Where is the part of the Constitution about god making the laws? Was that before or after the part about the president being required to slay a dragon?

10/24/2011 6:41:33 AM

Doctor Whom

Homosexual “marriage” is such a silly concept, since it is only about validating urges of putting one’s body parts or other objects into cavities that only produce disease and nihilism. For homosexuals demanding the ability to redefine thousands of years of tradition by calling their sick relationships—”marriage” to validate vile, demeaning acts and urges perpetrated on a human being and call it “love” is beyond rational thinking and should be discouraged through the legal system.

Lots of heterosexual marriages meet that description, too. I guess we need the true-love police to decide which couples love each other enough to marry.

You have numerous cases of real “love” which doesn’t demand defiling bodies for ones lust—such as the love of a mother for her child. There need not be any laws demanding they be allowed to get “married”.

No, there need not be. Do you know why not? I have no need to establish a legal relationship with my mother because I already am legally related to her. Want to hear something even kinkier? I'm legally related to my whole family.

Forcing others to validate such sick, demeaning behaviors is unconstitutional and destroys the concept of our Constitution—that there are laws of nature and nature’s God—where our Natural Rights are given. We can not allow an atheist, Satanic view of the human body to destroy the concepts of the Constitution.

The Declaration of Independence isn't part of the Constitution. The 5th and 14th Amendments are.

The stupidity of the left is beyond belief....all their ideas are bankrupt and if debate is allowed (political correctness is Marxism) they would be in the ash heap of history.

Debate about the ideas of the "left" isn't allowed? In which galaxy?

10/24/2011 6:42:02 AM

Anon-e-moose

(From the episode of "Top Gear", after Richard 'Hamster' Hammond has reviewed the three-wheeled tilting vehicle, the Vandenbrink Carver):



Jeremy Clarkson: 'You just know it has to have come from a country where drugs are legal!'

(referring to the Carver's country of manufacture, the Netherlands; also it's driver between passengers' legs seating configuration):

Jeremy Clarkson: 'This is a country where homosexual marriage is legal! [jokingly] And he's...'

Richard Hammond (in faux-Dutch 'Chrazhy, shexhy' accent) [jokingly]: 'He ish my partner, and alsho my lover!'

Moral: Note the country of origin of said Vandenbrink Carver, susiepoos. Ergo, USA =/= The World. Q.E. and D., bitch.

And isn't Holland - via King William of Orange - the basis of modern Protestant Christianity as we (certainly you lot) know it?! I live in Hull, one of the Top 5 least religious parts of the UK. We in Hull have a statue of William of Orange - a.k.a. 'King Billy'; gilded, no less:



Remember: Holland - home of William of Orange - was one of, if not the first, countries in the world to legalise gay marriage. Irony. Can be such a cruel bitch when she wants to be, eh?! >:D

10/24/2011 7:08:05 AM

ChakatBlackstar

what is it with Christians and not getting that emotional love doesn't equal sex or lust?

10/24/2011 7:15:16 AM

Sadhuman

Just cause you think something is "sick" is not a reason to ban people from doing it. And since it is not your church who marries you but the Government what your church things doesn't count.

Get your religion out of my marriage. XD

10/24/2011 7:19:31 AM

Brianisha

Anal sex makes atheists? really? Most gays are christian, back your BS up with facts, moron.

10/24/2011 7:46:03 AM
1 2 3 4