Homosexual “marriage” is such a silly concept
Strangely enough I agree... But only in the sense that I find the entire concept of marriage to be rather silly.
since it is only about validating urges of putting one’s body parts or other objects into cavities
What is with you people and your seemingly near obsession with gay sex? Is marriage between heterosexuals only about "validating urges of putting one’s body parts or other objects into cavities"? If not, then what possible reason do you have to expect that same-sex relationships would be?
that only produce disease and nihilism
From this one can only assume that you know next to nothing about either human anatomy, or the definition of the word "nihilism".
For homosexuals demanding the ability to redefine thousands of years of tradition
The only form of marriage that can lay a legitimate claim to having "thousands of years of tradition" is POLYGAMY!
by calling their sick relationships”marriage” to validate vile, demeaning acts and urges perpetrated on a human being and call it “love” is beyond rational thinking
First, you ave not given anyone the slightest sign that you are even capable of, much less excersizing, anything that even so much as resembles "rational thinking".
Second, you're obsession with gay sex rears it's head again. Anyone, I repeat ANYONE who has ever known a same sex couple can plainly see, whether they want to admit it or not, that same sex relationships are based on far more than just sex, and to claim otherwise is nothing more than a frank and outright lie meant only to advance an ideological agenda of hatred and exclusion.
and should be discouraged through the legal system.
I'm sorry, but where in the US Constitution is the legal system given authority over the relationships of american citizens?
You have numerous cases of real “love” which doesn’t demand defiling bodies for ones lustsuch as the love of a mother for her child. There need not be any laws demanding they be allowed to get “married”.
Again with this frankly stupid assertion that same sex relationships are based on nothing other than sex acts? As for your other assertion... Same sex relationships are in no way analagous to the relationship between a parent and child. There is no valid comparison there.
Forcing others to validate such sick, demeaning behaviors is unconstitutional and destroys the concept of our Constitution
No one is "forcing" you to validate anything! Hell, they aren't even asking you. No one is going to come and demand that you change your views on same sex marriage, because this is not about you! This is about letting others follow their conscience and marry the partner of their choice, regardless of gender.
There is not a single constitutional issue involved. No one is forcing you to be in a same sex marriage, no one is forcing to be involved in or officiate a same sex marriage ceremony, and if two other people of the same sex want to get married it simply does not concern you! Despite what you seem to think, you DO NOT and NEVER HAVE had a constitutional right to not be offended, nor do you have the right to demand anyone to conform to your beliefs or expectations.
that there are laws of nature and nature’s Godwhere our Natural Rights are given
The constitution makes no mention of any "god" whatsoever. Maybe you should try actually reading the damn thing before you expound on it's contents.
We can not allow an atheist, Satanic view of the human body to destroy the concepts of the Constitution.
Same sex marriage is neither an atheist nor a "satanic" concept, and the constitution, being secular in nature, has nothing to fear from non religious concepts.
The stupidity of the left is beyond belief
Gay rights is not te sole province of the political "left", seeing as how you increasingly find gays on both sides of the political spectrum, and I highly doubt the gays on the political right are going to to just say fuck-all to their own rights in a fit of partisan pique
(political correctness is Marxism)
You don't even know what Marxism is, do you?
all their ideas are bankrupt and if debate is allowed they would be in the ash heap of history
Silencing those who would dissent or disagree with you is the act of a coward who lacks all faith in is own convictions.