1 2 3
"Sanger's family planning advocacy always focused on contraception, rather than abortion.[note 10] It was not until the mid 1960s, after Sanger's death, that the reproductive rights movement expanded its scope to include abortion rights as well as contraception.[note 11] Sanger was opposed to abortions, both because they were dangerous for the mother, and because she believed that life should not be terminated after conception."
^ Pictured, reality.
Fuck Christians to hell.
10/26/2011 1:24:02 PM
I'm sorry. Are you telling me abortion is NOT an effective means of birth control?
10/26/2011 7:49:07 PM
Jesus Christ, founder of Christianism, was known as a child rapist who buggered every little boy, who he referred to as "my chioldren," from the Egyptian border to the Sea of Galilee. He was such a drunk he used his magical powers to turn water to wine, and he also magicked food into existence because he rarely held a steady job.
He had delusions of being the son of god and, despite promises to return from the dead in his followers' lifetimes, has remained dead until this day.
Whee, it's fun to make up shit about dead people.
10/27/2011 9:45:58 PM
"[Margaret Sanger, founder of Planned Parenthood] was known as"
And stop right there... if you are going to attack something based on the character of it's founder, then let me say something to you...
Jesus is the bastard offspring of a paedophilic rapist genocidic god whose idea of a just punishment is eternal torture for something he could forgive, but won't.
And you know something? Everything I just said is in your Bible... so you can't even claim I'm lying.
10/28/2011 1:11:31 PM
Citation needed?, if I remember right, she was against abortion.
10/29/2011 8:19:09 AM
I smell bullshit. I bet she was a devout christian wasnt she?
10/29/2011 5:29:34 PM
Ethicists Argue Killing Newborn Babies Should Be Allowed
“…The authors argue that “both fetuses and newborns do not have the same moral status as actual persons,” and that because abortion is allowed even when there is no problem with the fetus’ health, “killing a newborn should be permissible in all the cases where abortion is, including cases where the newborn is not disabled.”
“The fact that both are potential persons is morally irrelevant,” the authors claim, arguing that adoption is not a reasonable counter-argument because the parents of the baby might be economically or psychologically burdened the process and the mother may “suffer psychological distress…”
The facts for the above article are directly from the journal of medical ethics:
After-birth abortion: why should the baby live?
I wonder why all of you haters that rip on Christians cannot see the forest for the trees... It's really sad.
2/28/2012 10:00:37 PM
Has anyone notice this is a quote from one person. Before spewing hate might be worthy to get to know more than a single quote. Believer-Beleiver in something else, It is fact that no one who has made a comment has lived thus far without causing harm to someone else. We all state things as fact and give our opinion. Before going on a witch hunt maybe a which? hunt to really see whether all the superfluous dribble profits anyone . Joe or Margaret. Really the question is what have you done that makes you better or worse than either better than someone who claim to be a believer a non believer. One camp beleives that there is a God who will upon repentance will forgive the many lousy decisions humans make and there are plenty of other views. I'd rather be concerned with how I can make myself available to contribute to others than to argue about an opinion ( oh, and I am happy to be able to express that opinion) now hang me or if i can do anything that could be of help ask. Somehow though, I feel like I will be bashed regardless
5/25/2012 2:05:53 AM
Don't speak ill of the dead...
If this bozo had his way, he'd probably dig Margaret Sanger up and burn her body.
10/24/2012 6:25:23 AM
"She viewed abortion as not only a powerful weapon in the hands of eugenicists, but as an effective means of birth control."
Hosea 13:16: 'Samaria will be held guilty, For she has rebelled against her God. They will fall by the sword, Their little ones will be dashed in pieces, And their pregnant women will be ripped open.
Your own God would agree with her.
"She wrote harshly against the idea of abstinence and self-control, stating that society should "Remove the constraints and prohibitions which now hinder the release of inner [sexual] energies…"
Proverbs 5:19: 'As a loving hind and a gentle doe, let her breasts ever give you rapture;
let your passion at all times be moved by her love
'. You FAIL II.
"The fallout of her philosophies has been an increase in the rate of divorce, an epidemic in sexually transmitted diseases and the sacrifice of millions of children on the narcissistic altar of self."
You are a male
fundie. You FAIL III, and you've struck out. Besides, as proved by this link: Your argument is invalid.
Matthew 7:1 ring any bells...? Throw not that stone, little fundie, throw not that stone.
"Adolf Hitler was very strongly against smoking.
Does that mean that not smoking is supporting Hitler?"
Thus not only is the entire pro-Lifers' cause & it's argument annihilated, it never fucking existed in the first place (Hosea 13:16), nor - as the above fact proves - will it ever have the right to exist.
10/24/2012 6:36:06 AM
1 2 3