1 2 3 4
#1354016
solomongrundy
As dogs giving birth to roaches would blow the theory of evolution out of the water it's a good thing they don't.
12/3/2011 4:52:34 AM
#1354019
rw23
> are we not reproducing after our own kind
Yes, but with several minor differences, visible or not. That's why you don't look identical to either of your parents. Give it a million years and those differences build up.
12/3/2011 5:11:28 AM
#1354023
snowjohnson
"shameless liars", are you talking about hovind?
12/3/2011 5:13:59 AM
#1354026
rubber chicken
Define "kind", fuckwit.
12/3/2011 5:23:33 AM
#1354027
Percy Q. Shunn
12/3/2011 5:24:59 AM
#1354033
Mudak
Isn't the bible the same book that said that whales are fish and that bars are birds?
12/3/2011 5:38:52 AM
#1354037
Bad Wolf
Rednecks still give birth to idiots, i guess you win after all.
12/3/2011 5:57:17 AM
#1354041
Brendan Rizzo
And shameless liars continue to use the same straw man argument no matter how many times it is refuted.
12/3/2011 6:43:37 AM
#1354044
Ken
Evolution is much more gradual than that.
We do give birth to apes, though.
12/3/2011 6:56:00 AM
#1354046
D Laurier
"Atheist: do you not give birth after your own kind?"
As a male, I do not give birth at all.
Nobody ever fed me evolution. Evolution is not a thing, it is a process. An observable and widely documented process that has been the foundation of our economy for over 10,000 years.
12/3/2011 7:00:59 AM
#1354048
Dr.Shrinker
The answer is "yes." All people are born atheists. It is only when people come into contact with irrational, superstitious crackpots like you that problems start to occur.
12/3/2011 7:12:52 AM
#1354050
Constructing a strawman argument is pretty shameless lying Andy.
12/3/2011 7:19:03 AM
#1354054
And ignorant, undeducated people who think that evolution says monkeys gave spontaneous birth to humans apparently keep producing their own kind also.
12/3/2011 7:38:07 AM
#1354058
Gawd
If a (wo)man gave birth to a monkey, it would be devastating to evolutionary theory and it would be abandoned on the spot. (solomongrundy got it)
12/3/2011 7:54:15 AM
#1354065
\m/>_<\m/
"man do not give birth to monkeys."
i beg to differ! [/ad hominem for the lulz]
also,
"shameless liars are we not reproducing after our own kind."
wut does that mean? o_0
12/3/2011 8:06:12 AM
#1354068
Horsefeathers
"Atheist: do you not give birth after your own kind?"
Please stop talking like a King James knockoff.
"Long before satan fed you evolution God said: "Let the earth bring forth the living creature according to it's kind" (Genesis 1:24)"
Yes. And?
"Dogs do not give birth to roaches."
Obviously. That would just be silly.
"man do not give birth to monkeys."
No, but we do give birth to apes.
"shameless liars are we not reproducing after our own kind."
Yes. We are. Now, what was the point of all of this exactly?
12/3/2011 8:17:03 AM
#1354070
I think I'm going to become a science teacher to fix stuff like this.
12/3/2011 8:25:58 AM
#1354074
clockworkgirl21
If something gave birth to another species, it would disprove evolution.
The answer is "yes." All people are born atheists.
What? No. We'll all born with no idea what the fuck religion is. That isn't atheism.
12/3/2011 8:44:21 AM
#1354076
Jessica
Andy, Andy mate.
Just stop for a minute the Christian fundamentalist ride you are on. Remove the Bible glasses. Your God won't punish you for it, He knows you're human and fallible. And read, just read, what you have written.
Use your God-given reason.
Can you see now how silly it is?
Because it just does not, in any manner, shape or form describe Darwinian evolution by natural selection.
It's women who give birth to apes, because we are primates, apes, by the way.
12/3/2011 8:47:50 AM
#1354079
Robespierre
Not exactly, since babies are not clones. Mutations, while rare, can and do happen. Those that make it more likely to be passed on are, by definition, more likely to be passed on, and therefore to become more prevalent in future generations.
The first statement is a known fact, the last is a tautology. Next question.
12/3/2011 8:52:03 AM
#1354085
Dr.Shrinker
@ clockworkgirl21
A- "without"
theism -"Deity or deities"
I stand by my assertion: people are born atheists.
12/3/2011 9:13:05 AM
#1354086
Brain_In_A_Jar
Atheist: do you not give birth after your own kind?
Sure, we have atheist kids of our own. Christians, on the other hand, don't give birth to Christian kids - Christianity has to be induced.
Oh, did you mean something else?
12/3/2011 9:16:12 AM
#1354089
Flah
A man giving birth would definitely wind up in the newspapers. A man giving birth to a monkey...
12/3/2011 9:26:22 AM
#1354090
myheadhurts
IDK your Mama may have given birth to a monkey.
12/3/2011 9:28:00 AM
#1354100
Alencon
Ignorance is bliss isn't it? If any of those things were to happen, the Theory of Evolution would be falsified and collapse.
12/3/2011 9:49:58 AM
1 2 3 4