Home Archives Random Quotes Latest Comments Top 100 Submit Quote Search Log In

Quote# 85065

Museums devoted to displaying the Darwin story have carefully, and deliberately painted a false picture of the fossil record. I wonder how many people are aware of the deceptions involved in this supposedly educational enterprise.

Quotes and comments;

1. "Paleontologists have found 432 mammal species in the dinosaur layers….But where are these fossils? We visited 60 museums but did not see a single complete mammal skeleton from the dinosaur layers displayed at any of these museums.'' [1.]

- Here is plain proof that evolutionists are deliberately falsifying the fossil record so as to create a delusory myth in the minds of the public. How can anyone trust the people who do this kind of thing? Why would anyone expect people like this to be honest when talking about the origins debate? They clearly have no interest in the truth, but care only about propagating a myth.

- Here is clear evidence that refutes the great Darwinian myth, as these collections just should not happen according to textbook theory. Anyone who accepts cosmic evolution in the light of these findings does so despite the evidence not because of the evidence.

Many (most?) natural history museums have more to do with the muses than with science, and are shrines to materialism and cosmic evolution.

2. 'Werner also learned that dinosaur-containing rock layers have "fossilized examples from every major invertebrate animal phylum living today," and that dinosaurs were mixed in with varieties of fish, amphibians, "parrots, owls, penguins, ducks, loons, albatross, cormorants, sandpipers, avocets, etc." [1.]

- The Darwinian myth has been carefully manufactured, and bears little relationship to reality. The museums are temples devoted to cosmic evolution, as the scenarios they paint (and present) are fictional... and are very little different than Disneyland. One day they'll be seen as the amusement parks they really are.

This is a prime example of what's known as the engineering (or manufacturing) of consent. The success of Darwinism is almost entirely due to the false (iconic) pictures and images evolutionists have invented and painted for the public mind. Without the (false) images the words would mean nothing.

3. “Few are aware of the great number of mammal species found with dinosaurs. Paleontologists have found 432 mammal species in the dinosaur layers; almost as many as the number of dinosaur species. These include nearly 100 complete mammal skeletons." [4.]

- Fossils are the sacred relics of Evolution, the sacred stones of naturalist religion, and the natural history museum is the modern Pantheon, where the inner sanctum always seems to feature that lumbering saint of Darwinism, the dinosaur.

These Darwinian displays are a good example of the Potemkin village, as they're utterly fake and bear little resemblance to reality. The fact you display a bone is meaningless in itself, as it's the context that makes all the difference. In most cases it's not the bones that are displayed that is important, it's the bones that are not displayed which is crucial. These displays could be compared to the sets Hollywood used to make and use, and they have as little educational value.

Summary;
Museum directors see themselves as guardians of cosmic evolution and as members of an elite who is going to cure the common folk of their delusions, since they're too incompetent to do it on their own. (Curators of museums now see themselves as curators of the soul.)

- M. Johnson

M. Johnson , Thinking About Creation 42 Comments [12/4/2011 1:07:39 PM]
Fundie Index: 78
WTF?! || meh
Username:
Comment:



1 2
Mister Spak

"1. "Paleontologists have found 432 mammal species in the dinosaur layers….But where are these fossils? We visited 60 museums but did not see a single complete mammal skeleton from the dinosaur layers displayed at any of these museums.'' [1.] "

Because these fossils are mostly teeth the size of a mouse. People go to museums to see tyrannosaur models not mouse teeth.

The rest of your blithering is just as idiotic.

12/5/2011 6:40:03 AM



Mammals have been around since the late triassic; they didn't just suddenly appear after the dinosaurs died. How does that somehow argue against evolution?

Nevermind, this hurts my brain.

12/5/2011 7:11:54 AM

aaa

Just another knob with a very poor grasp of biology.

12/5/2011 8:59:50 AM

Anon-e-moose

And all of M(asters &) Johnson's tl;dr here can be completely annihilated by just three words:

Kitzmiller versus Dover.

Moral: 'Thinking About Creation'? Well, that's all you can do...! [/Spartan Laconic Wit]

12/5/2011 10:40:11 AM

pete

Museums depend on visitors for revenues. Dinosaur bones can be reconstructed into towering and awe-inspiring behemoths that bring in the visitors. Most ancient mammal bones are more reminiscent of what one finds in a mouse trap one forgot to check for a couple years.

12/5/2011 10:42:28 AM

Frank

"Museums devoted to displaying the Darwin story have carefully, and deliberately painted a false picture of the fossil record"

Yeah, and as we all know creationist museums never lie.

12/5/2011 11:49:21 AM

Alethe

Many (most?) natural history museums have more to do with the muses than with science

Etymologically correct, factually wrong.

12/5/2011 6:03:17 PM

TheJebusFire

[They clearly have no interest in the truth, but care only about propagating a myth.]

If by "they" you mean yourself, then you're right!

12/5/2011 9:22:00 PM

Agahnim

The thing about the story of Darwin is that it isn't fictional. Not all stories are, dumbass.

12/6/2011 4:50:18 PM

Alethe

Many (most?) natural history museums have more to do with the muses than with science

Etymologically correct, factually wrong.

12/6/2011 5:06:36 PM



In other words, I have NO IDEA of what paleontology is about and I asume that is a fraud. Whatever.

12/10/2011 4:28:14 AM

tranz2deep

Adding more words doesn't make a flawed premise any more valid.. just more confusing.

12/12/2011 7:26:18 AM

Godless heathen

The Natural History Museum in London does exhibit early mammal fossils, but in a different section from their dinosaur fossils. I think the reasons for doing so are obvious and I imagine most good natural history museums do something similar.

12/13/2011 1:01:11 AM

The Anonymous

The blog's name is a lie, because anyone who actually thinks about Creation(ism) realises that it's bullshit "science" over an ancient Near East myth.

Though it makes me wonder if any form of heathenry/paganism had survived into the modern age if they would also be creating blogs demonising science like this.

8/7/2012 9:52:29 PM

Canadiest

“Few are aware of the great number of mammal species found with dinosaurs."

Oh? And how are some aware of this?

"Paleontologists have found 432 mammal species in the dinosaur layers"

Exactly. Which in no way shakes the knowledge of that time or counters evolutionary theory. Some creationist will think he has a win argument now because mammals have been discovered amoungst dinosaurs " Therefore GOD, checkmate you dum evolutionaryistism!"

8/11/2012 5:33:36 AM

Quantum Mechanic

What utter horse shit.

6/29/2013 5:50:17 AM

Justanotheratheist

I have no idea what "cosmic evolution" is, but I have no doubt at all that M.Johnson is a fucking idiot.

6/29/2013 6:40:56 AM
1 2