Quote# 85092

Its just not true that men and women acheive equally.
Science axhievement still reflects this.
I’m not saying women are intellectual inferior.
Actually Darwin did say this.
I’m saying womens failure is due to motivation.
I see this as a very real identity of them due to their biblical calling to support their husbands first or only.
women don’t have ambition and despite or society pushing them they still fail to keep up anywhere where results are unbiased.
Only in school or other simple enterprises of mere studying do they compete.

This is a Mans world because we were created to do well before God.
We are on the make.

Yes there is a organized and profound agenda to raise women up at the immoral and illegal loss to men.
Affirmative action is for anyone the establishment wants to raise up and knows can’t without it.

Robert Byers, Uncommon Descent 51 Comments [12/27/2011 3:57:31 AM]
Fundie Index: 66

Username  (Login)
Comment  (Text formatting help) 

1 2 3 | bottom


May we please have a Sexists say the darnedest things board? Pretty please!

12/27/2011 4:38:17 AM

Atomic Flamethrowing Vagina

"Women comprised 51.5% of management, professional and related positions."

"In the U.S., for the 2009-2010 academic year, women made up 47.2% of law school students.
In 2010, women were 31.5% of all lawyers.
In 2011, women were 45.4% of all associates,13 and 19.5% of all partners."


Shut up, asshole. I'm a 19 year old woman and pursuing my Biology degree, then my DVM. FYI, a DVM is harder to attain than an MD.

12/27/2011 4:39:21 AM



... wait for it:

"I’m not saying women are intellectual inferior"

No, you better not! I don't know any woman who spells worse than you do.

12/27/2011 4:46:50 AM


Robert Byers, Alpha Male.

Nope, I don't think so.

12/27/2011 4:51:19 AM


My, you're a convincing argument for the innate superiority of men. What a wonderfully lucid and compelling turn of phrase you possess. Seriously though, if you were just the tiniest bit smarter, you'd be too embarassed to share these opinions, (clearly the products of damaged synapses) with anyone else. As it is, you're unfortunately too stupid to realise that pretty much anyone, male or female, could outthink you with one brain hemisphere tied behind their back.

12/27/2011 5:18:23 AM

First of all, English motherfucker. Second, if they´re not intellectual inferior, why obeying their husbands as if they were children?. You know, nature is not politically correct.

12/27/2011 5:57:28 AM

Quantum Mechanic

Die in a fire asshole.

12/27/2011 5:59:26 AM


Fellas, Fellas, clearly he's right. He belongs to the species 'Homo Sapiens Idiota'. He is a credit to HSI, with spelling like that, why.. we can actually kinda sorta make out what he was frothing about. Let me be clear - he absolutely does not belong to 'Homo Sapiens Sapiens'

...Alright - I'm too braindead to keep up the joke any longer.. it's easier to call you a sexist misogynist fucktwat sir. Now go die in a fire. But maybe your lesson before dying can be proper english, ne?

12/27/2011 6:18:51 AM


Sexists say the darnedest things

12/27/2011 6:45:10 AM

Table Rock

Immoral and illegal? What country are you in? Iran?

12/27/2011 7:22:14 AM


"This is a Mans world because we were created to do well before God.

Four words: Florence Nighingale. Marie Curie. Your argument is invalid.

"We are on the make."

I'll say. Two words: Kent Hovind.

'Nuff said.

12/27/2011 7:25:46 AM


This is a "man's world" according to the bible because the bible was written by men trying to support the patriarchy. That you don't understand this is your failure, not women's.

12/27/2011 7:36:59 AM

Doubting Thomas

So, you believe that women can't achieve much because they lack motivation, yet you believe their job is to stay in the kitchen and make sandwiches for her man?

You are a sexist pig in the purest essence of the meaning.

12/27/2011 7:45:38 AM


I'd like to point out that, biblically, you men wouldn't have the knowledge of, well, knowledge, if we didn't give it to you. You owe us and our immorality for your "superiority."

Also, if you can't spell or use proper English, I'd say you aren't qualified to speak on intellect.

12/27/2011 8:03:29 AM

Professor Smartypants

You see, the flaw in your theory is that I don't feel particularly motivated to play the role of the perfect homemaker. Or even that of the mediocre homemaker. Maybe one of those competitive Y-chromosome owners would like to stop by and compete against the growing pile of dirty dishes in my kitchen? Much appreciated!

12/27/2011 8:08:26 AM


"support their husbands first or only"
That's exactly the problem- too many women are supporting their husbands.

12/27/2011 8:38:00 AM

Brendan Rizzo

Interesting. A misogynist who blames Christianity for women allegedly being inferior.

12/27/2011 9:11:46 AM


Looks like last minute Top 100 contender material to me...

12/27/2011 9:35:00 AM


Equal acheivement isn't the point, it's equal opportunity to acheive which is important.

12/27/2011 11:00:54 AM


So basically because society was sexist for hundreds of years and didn't let women become scientists, you use this as proof women are somehow stupid?

12/27/2011 11:16:44 AM


Is this supposed to be a poem or something?

12/27/2011 11:35:02 AM


He's on the make? Maybe he's not doing too well at that; hence, this peroration.

12/27/2011 11:42:43 AM

I'll admit, perhaps I was hired because I'm a woman, because the company I work for had a 30 to 1 ratio of men to women. But they would not have hired me if I wasn't already qualified.

12/27/2011 12:08:06 PM


So...I take it you have women troubles Robert and use the Bible to justify chauvanism and misogyny? The failure is not the woman's then

12/27/2011 12:42:47 PM

So, smarter, more efficient women keep getting promoted over you at work, eh?

12/27/2011 1:28:52 PM

1 2 3 | top: comments page