Home Archives Random Quotes Latest Comments Top 100 Submit Quote Search Log In

Quote# 85092

Its just not true that men and women acheive equally.
Science axhievement still reflects this.
I’m not saying women are intellectual inferior.
Actually Darwin did say this.
I’m saying womens failure is due to motivation.
I see this as a very real identity of them due to their biblical calling to support their husbands first or only.
women don’t have ambition and despite or society pushing them they still fail to keep up anywhere where results are unbiased.
Only in school or other simple enterprises of mere studying do they compete.

This is a Mans world because we were created to do well before God.
We are on the make.

Yes there is a organized and profound agenda to raise women up at the immoral and illegal loss to men.
Affirmative action is for anyone the establishment wants to raise up and knows can’t without it.

Robert Byers, Uncommon Descent 51 Comments [12/27/2011 3:57:31 AM]
Fundie Index: 66
WTF?! || meh
Username:
Comment:



1 2 3
Old Viking

That agonized scream is the English language.

12/27/2011 1:52:10 PM

pete

I think two examples will suffice.

Marie Currie and Mary, the mother of Jesus.

The first did as much or more to advance our understanding of radioactivity than any single man and the second managed to convince billions of people that she got knocked up by an invisible spirit.

12/27/2011 1:58:57 PM

Skatepunk

It's been said before, but I will say it anyway.

1. Marie Curie, bitch!

2. Sexists STDT please?

12/27/2011 2:56:01 PM

Anon

"Only in school or other simple enterprises of mere studying do they compete."

Mere studying? Simple enterprises? You obviously haven't seen my girlfriend's PhD thesis ... or my mother's master's thesis ... or my cousin's analysis reports from when she was working at Quantico.

If you're saying that men have on average slightly higher upper-body strength, you'd be right. But, quoting the wisdom of Gordon Dickson:

"Trouble rather the tiger in his lair than the sage amongst his books. For to you the Kingdoms and their armies are things mighty and enduring, but to him they are but toys of the moment, to be overturned by the flicking of a finger."
—Gordon R. Dickson, The Tactics of Mistake


Physical strength never has been the defining characteristic of humanity (if you think it is, trying wrestling with a chimp). Endurance and far more importantly intelligence are. And neither depends on gender.

>>Yes there is a organized and profound agenda to raise women up at the immoral and illegal loss to men.<<

Giving others the same opportunities that you have is not the same as taking opportunities away from you.

>>Affirmative action is for anyone the establishment wants to raise up and knows can’t without it. ... women don’t have ambition and despite or society pushing them they still fail to keep up anywhere where results are unbiased.<<

Point of interest: Caltech's admissions committee is very much against affirmative action. And yet last year's undergraduate class was 45% women, and there isn't a significant overall gender difference in how well they do.

Again: Your Argument Is Invalid.

12/27/2011 3:21:07 PM

wysage

Reference to Darwin's statement, please. Darwin did not discuss human intelligence in "The Origin of the Species," and in "The Descent of Man," women's choice of mates made humans what we are today. Obviously, women are not choosing you, which will increase intelligence in the next generation.

12/27/2011 3:28:31 PM

v200

Fuck off. That's all I have to say.

12/27/2011 4:30:58 PM

aaa

All i see in this is the same moronic "BOOTSTRAPS" argument that gets rehashed over and over again. I wonder if these people could understand just how important things like circumstances and having the opportunity in the first place.

12/27/2011 5:12:35 PM

Song

Edit: Forget what I said before. Just... learn how to see others as human beings, dude.

12/27/2011 5:23:35 PM

Nowonmai

Did your mommy hug you too much, or not enough?

12/27/2011 5:56:23 PM

whoanelly

Ok: Condoleeza Rice. Angela Merkel. Oprah. Marie Curie. Hillary Clinton-hell, your kind has been complaining for years she's an ambitious bitch! And many, MANY more.

Though of course, your impeccable grasp of the English language is a resounding argument for male superiority. /rolls eyes/

12/27/2011 7:04:45 PM

Hive

Go fuck yourself, Rob.

12/27/2011 7:16:01 PM

DevilsChaplain

We're never going to do a Sexists Say the Darndest Things section. That's basically been settled. Really wish people would stop asking.

12/27/2011 7:37:10 PM

Amadaun

Why not?

12/28/2011 12:50:03 AM

louislois

No god would allow grammar/spelling such as yours.

12/28/2011 12:52:06 AM

The Jamo

Its just not true that men and women acheive equally.
Science axhievement still reflects this.


Spelling, however, does not.

12/28/2011 4:51:16 AM

Giardano Bruno

The cleverest person I have ever met, and the person I most care for after my wife is a Shanghainese woman. Who is also not someone I would EVER want to have a fight with because I would lose. Quickly.

It would help if people like this made friends with women.

12/28/2011 1:57:28 PM



So you're saying God and Religion sets everyone up to fail?

12/28/2011 4:53:26 PM



Ah, Byers, the man who thinks polar bears are white because they're afraid of humans.

And he thinks women are intellectually inferior

lol

12/28/2011 5:49:26 PM

tranz2deep

@Amadan

..Alpha Male? HIM?!?

Dude, this flake's the Omega Man.

12/28/2011 6:38:11 PM

Raised by Horses

"Actually Darwin did say this."

Ah, yes. I remember. That bit from Origin of Species where he wrote: 'Thus, from the war of nature, from famine and death, the most exalted object which we are capable of conceiving, namely, the production of the higher animals, directly follows. There is grandeur in this view of life, with its several powers, having been originally breathed by the Creator into a few forms or into one; and that, whilst this planet has gone cycling on according to the fixed law of gravity, from so simple a beginning endless forms most beautiful and most wonderful have been, and are being evolved. Also, wimmin are dumb as spanners, ain't they?' -Charlie D.

12/31/2011 3:51:26 AM

Anon-e-moose

(*Sings*):

'This is a man's... man's... man's world
But it would be nothing... nothing... NOTHIIING!
Without a woman or a girl!'

Three words: Rosie the Riveter.

Your argument is invalid.

12/31/2011 9:43:10 AM

Brianisha

Im sure your mom would love to hear the shit that youve been spouting. Go ahead, call her up, see what she thinks.

12/31/2011 8:53:43 PM

Justanotheratheist

I fully agree with those posters who think we're way overdue for a "Sexists say the Darnest Things" section.

Oh, and I'd pay money for a front row seat if this idiot tried to spew his brand of antiquated horseshit at the likes of Angela Merkel or (shudder) Maggie Thatcher. Golda Meir and Indira Ghandi would have been fun, too.


12/31/2011 10:24:09 PM



So you mean that that female mixed martial arts fighter I saw didn't exist? So what was she? Was she a robot?

1/13/2012 12:23:58 AM

Swede

What about language and spelling "axhievement"? I'm much better than you, and English is my second language. Judging by your name, English is probably your first language.

My brother-in-law and his fiancée both have a doctorate. She succeeded a few years before him. They support each other.

School is not a simple enterprise, stupid. Yale, Oxford and Cambridge are also schools, ya know.

Affirmative actions are often needed because women have to be twice as good as the male competition before they are considered an option to the comfortable solution of picking a man.
Little boys don't wanna play with girls, ya know, you might get cooties.

1/13/2012 7:40:48 AM
1 2 3