1 2 3
#1357561
checkmate
I do pray that some day a bunch of politicians with their heads affixed firmly to their necks will muster the balls to rewrite the constitution of this country
Keep praying for that. Do it somewhere in private. Quietly. Pray lots. Spend all your time praying. And leave us alone.
12/14/2011 12:52:22 PM
#1357572
Old Viking
You can tell that Ol' Jon is a real scholar.
12/14/2011 1:02:42 PM
#1357574
Bollox
Another stunningly original thinker. Heard it, dude.
12/14/2011 1:04:56 PM
#1357575
Teddy
Usual intelligent, well thought out arguments about bestiality, obviously, but this bit really stuck out:
"men “marrying” other men, and ditto women."
I genuinely read this as "Men marrying other men and men marrying women" for a second. Oops.
12/14/2011 1:05:26 PM
#1357589
Often Partisan
"Why, only this very month— you’d better believe this—a man, in a homosexual relationship with another man, gave birth to a child… "
Are you sure you didn't just stumble across some Mpreg on fanfiction.net?
12/14/2011 1:13:17 PM
#1357594
Tearlich
"...you’d better believe this—a man, in a homosexual relationship with another man, gave birth to a child…"
REALLY!! (Backs away slowly while dialing 911 on cell phone).
12/14/2011 1:18:22 PM
#1357598
TZL
Such morals in these times!
It's quite sad to think that people could be so ignorant as to believe that an airing of their own prejudices and dislikes constitutes a true observation of the decline of morality and ethical behaviour since the end of a hypothetical golden era. To me, seeing openly homosexual couples constitutes an advance in civilised behaviour, not a decline.
12/14/2011 1:25:04 PM
#1357604
Reynardine
First, I want proof of this male gestation before I even consider the rest of it. Then, I want to see an animal over 18 who is sui juris and legally competent to contract, in wedlock or otherwise.
12/14/2011 1:34:53 PM
#1357611
breakerslion
The real problem, as I see it, is the skewed, alleged morality of conservatards that focus on minutia while allowing themselves the freedom to rationalize mass murder - as long as they agree with the motivation.
12/14/2011 1:44:14 PM
#1357613
rikalous
"Why, only this very month— you’d better believe this—a man, in a homosexual relationship with another man, gave birth to a child…"
I assume one of them was a pre-op transman? Was the part where Qwelane explained what that has to do with anything excised?
Also,
http://i.imgur.com/Q1nCX.jpg
12/14/2011 1:53:24 PM
#1357615
You're gay.
12/14/2011 1:56:12 PM
#1357616
Auratwilight
I'm just going to entertain that piece of insanity for a moment: If two gays can have children together...what's the problem? I mean, wasn't the lack of kids coming out of their union the whole problem, for you guys? WELP.
12/14/2011 1:57:03 PM
#1357622
Agahnim
Preference implies choice. Stop lying and claiming sexuality is a choice. If it were, I could try to be gay for a while and see what it's like, but I can't and neither can you.
Oh, and the constitution isn't going to be corrupted by you and your nutjob buddies' influence, fortunately.
12/14/2011 2:17:27 PM
#1357641
TheJebusFireOtherwise, at this rate, how soon before some idiot demands to “marry” an animal, and argues that this constitution “allows” it?
12/14/2011 2:25:26 PM
#1357659
Brendan Rizzo
...Men cannot give birth to children, gay or not. We don't have wombs, you see. And you wouldn't need a Constitutional amendment to allow gay marriage; marriage of any kind is nowhere mentioned in the Constitution.
12/14/2011 2:49:27 PM
#1357686
Xotan
Too ignorant to bother about.
A bigot who doesn't mind lying transparently to try to make an argument.
12/14/2011 4:00:01 PM
#1357696
Zagen30
Ah, appeal to tradition. That's always been such a weighty and logical tactic.
12/14/2011 4:27:28 PM
#1357698
Pule Thamex
Is it possible to equate complete dribbling inanity with snarling homophobia? Jon Qwelane says it is.
12/14/2011 4:31:56 PM
#1357700
tracer
"Why, only this very month— you’d better believe this—a man, in a homosexual relationship with another man, gave birth to a child…"
I don't believe it.
12/14/2011 4:35:39 PM
#1357706
Skatepunk
Slippery slope.
NEXT!
12/14/2011 4:40:10 PM
#1357721
Raised by Horses
Heh. "Muster the balls". I've gotta remember that one..
For water cooler talks, I mean. >.>
12/14/2011 4:52:42 PM
#1357740
lisamariefan
What is these people's fixation with animals?
12/14/2011 5:43:40 PM
#1357754
Alencon
"...a man, in a homosexual relationship with another man, gave birth to a child..."
All I can say is, oh boy what a fucking moron. What did the birthing take place through? The urinary tract in his dick? Man that must of fucking hurt.
12/14/2011 5:58:05 PM
#1357755
Scelerata
If I recall, that whole male pregnancy thing was a transman who hadn't completed transitioning and still had his female anatomy.
Funny how your ilk scream and holler about transfolk not being legitimate men or women, but when it's convenient for your bigoted scare tactics, you're suddenly more than willing to acknowledge them.
12/14/2011 6:05:51 PM
#1357757
Renon
Well..in the biblical days livestock were sometimes offered as dowry or property of the marriage, which was the same social status of the woman getting married. So... if anyone advocates the marrying of animals, its tha fundies.
12/14/2011 6:07:40 PM
1 2 3