Quote# 85391

[Concerning a photo of a sailor who shared the homecoming kiss with her girlfriend.]

My first reaction at the obviously orchestrated commie gay-pride display was anger but it was quickly tempered, as THEY KNEW IT WOULD BE, by the two atypical participants of hot lesbo action. It is the psychology of a standard issue degenerate and visually-stimulated American male which I am.

The enemy is well-funded, well-trained, highly motivated and infiltrated into the highest levels of society and government. It knows exactly what it’s doing.

Hail the Amberlamps!, Moonbattery 76 Comments [12/27/2011 4:22:12 AM]
Fundie Index: 92

Username  (Login)
Comment  (Text formatting help) 

1 2 3 4 | bottom


Reading this reminds me of this one thing Umberto Eco wrote about fascists. Also, i laughed out loud when i noticed that you can't comprehend two decent looking ladies showing affection to each other.

12/27/2011 11:06:02 AM


Someone who served your country with respect but since she doesn't like dick this is how you treat her.

12/27/2011 11:14:15 AM


So, if the enemy wants people to kiss each other and not kill each other, then surely the enemy are the good guys.

12/27/2011 11:35:31 AM


Hate to tell you this, Bat Boy, but women have been kissing each other, hugging each other, holding hands, etc, since time immemorial, even when they were straight. Women do not have the fear men do of the close approach of their own sex that men do: in a state of nature, it is generally males who mean to cut each others' throats. And, though that looks like an enthusiastic smooch, it is discernable as homoerotic only because it's so labelled. Honi soit qui mal y pense, you know.

12/27/2011 11:35:56 AM


I thought it was hot. But it was a sign of love between the women. Now the enemy? that sounds fucking paranoid

12/27/2011 12:04:51 PM

D Laurier

Walking downtown with my girlfreind, I saw a lesbian couple holding hands. They kissed once while they waited for the light to change.

Just another happy couple out shopping for holiday stuff.

Where does this "Hail the Amberlamps" waffle get "hot lesbo action" from that?

12/27/2011 12:26:39 PM




Please elaborate.

The enemy is well-funded, well-trained, highly motivated and infiltrated into the highest levels of society and government.

Though not necessarily, I think you're trying to say that you and yours are poor, lack proper training, are unmotivated, and have no pull, except perhaps with the waitress at your local redneck bar.

You know, I think you're right. The macho, heterosexual people portrayed in that embarrassing television show "Jersey Shore" represent American ideals much better than Navy sailors returning home from active duty.

12/27/2011 1:04:37 PM

Giardano Bruno

Yes of course. People loving each other is disgusting.

12/27/2011 1:14:54 PM

I guess we now know what kind of porn Amberlamps watches, don't we?

12/27/2011 1:24:28 PM

Admiral Four Star

Dearest Hail the Amberlamps, Petty Officer Gaeta was at sea to defend your freedom and your right to criticize her, willing to risk her life to do so.

Which branch of the military did you say you served in? Oh, right, you didn't.

What else have you done for your country?

Just for your information, bitching on the internet doesn't count as civic duty.

12/27/2011 1:31:44 PM

Old Viking

But you do admit that what the enemy's is doing is being done well.

12/27/2011 1:34:25 PM


So basically "I hate gays but lesbians are hot."

Fuck you, good sir.

12/27/2011 2:19:01 PM


Well, it was "orchestrated" in the sense that one of the participants bought fifty tickets in the charity raffle to select who got the first kiss. That's hardly Communist, though.

12/27/2011 3:21:14 PM

Doctor Whom

Never mind how actual communists have ever behaved in the real world. We all know that "commie" means whatever I don't like.

12/27/2011 4:44:49 PM

Burning Stake

Or, it's just two people who happen to be homosexual sharing a kiss that happened to be captured. But, that's right, everything in the media is part of a completely orchestrated event to take down our youth. That's why so many of them read newspapers!...Wait...

God's Thumbs, if I had just returned home to my girlfriend/boyfriend, I would have a hard time just sharing a kiss with them, even in public. And you know what that means...bearhugs for all! :)

[selfabsorbed]And, the fact that part of your username is my "real name," and therefore obviously associated with me, bothers me.[/selfabsorbed]

12/27/2011 5:10:51 PM


Well, apparantly you're not Christian enough if you find gay women hot when they make out. You should immediately go get your asshole bolted shut to prevent teh gayz buttsexxing you and then spend a month in church praying to God for forgivness for falling for such an obvious trap.

12/27/2011 5:22:12 PM


Hey asshole, you just called yourself a degenerate. I'm also betting you typed your post with one hand, as you looked at the image of the two women your other hand was busy elsewhere.

12/27/2011 5:57:58 PM


I question the humanity of anyone whose reaction to the kiss was anything other than "D'awwwwww"

12/27/2011 6:24:47 PM


It's adorable, it's what it is. Deal with it.

12/27/2011 6:39:10 PM


Of course it was orchestrated-it was a staging of the famous kiss between a sailor and a nurse in Times Square. Not a part of some nefarious plot to gayify America.

Edit: I might be wrong. I saw the picture in the paper a couple of days ago and I've since thrown out the newspaper. Well even if I'm wrong, amber lamps here is still an idiot.

12/27/2011 6:47:59 PM


Goddamnit...I really hate it when straight men reduce my sexual orientation to be all about them. Look up the definition of lesbian, prick...it doesn't mention anything about little dicks like you - why do you think that is?

I look forward to the next time a conventionally attractive male couple is shown in the press - will you mention how attractive they are and that obviously it was staged?

12/27/2011 7:03:42 PM


But Hive! Of course your sexual orientation is all about them! The world revolves around them, don't you know???

12/27/2011 8:07:08 PM

Vermicious Knid

Dear Hail the Amberlamps!,

Your services are no longer required. The civilized world will proceed quite successfully without you. Your gold watch is in the mail.

The 21st century

PS. We hope your end is peaceful, painless and final.

12/27/2011 8:27:36 PM


All I got from that photo was that some young woman's wife/girlfriend was gone for a long time, and they're very happy to be reunited.

12/27/2011 10:46:45 PM

Raised by Horses


Calm down, pal. You let these people get your goat, you're only giving them more time and recognition than they deserve.

As for my comment, I'm not sure what it is that you're getting pissed off about, exactly. About the photo being staged or not, just turn it around in your head for a little bit. Maybe it was, maybe it wasn't, but there are some interesting historical parallels to be considered here.

And your last question is, quite frankly, absurd. Being that I find women attractive, I occasionally comment on the subject. Yes, obviously the women in question are lesbians and therefore would probably not return any interest. Does that mean I should not comment on their looks? Perhaps I should refrain from commenting on women altogether without first inquiring into their sexuality? (And to answer the question more directly: I can acknowledge a guy being attractive, but I'm not attracted to men, so no, I'd probably not feel particularly obliged to comment on it).

Like I said, you're getting way too worked up about all this. Take a few deep breaths, maybe go for a walk or something.

12/27/2011 10:57:43 PM

1 2 3 4 | top: comments page