1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Or here is an idea maybe hitler used Christianity as tool to get what he wanted. Doesn't make him an actual christian. Hitler used the name of Christianity as a weapon, a tool and you get it?
3/8/2012 3:13:24 PM
"My feelings as a Christian points me to my Lord and Savior as a fighter. It points me to the man who once in loneliness, surrounded by a few followers, recognized these Jews for what they were and summoned men to fight against them and who, God’s truth! was greatest not as a sufferer but as a fighter. In boundless love as a Christian and as a man I read through the passage which tells us how the Lord at last rose in His might and seized the scourge to drive out of the Temple the brood of vipers and adders. How terrific was His fight for the world against the Jewish poison. To-day, after two thousand years, with deepest emotion I recognize more profoundly than ever before the fact that it was for this that He had to shed His blood upon the Cross. As a Christian I have no duty to allow my self to be cheated, but I have the duty to be a fighter for truth and justice… And if there is anything which could demonstrate that we are acting rightly it is the distress that daily grows . For as a Christian I have also a duty to my own people." –Adolf Hitler, in a speech on 12 April 1922 (Norman H. Baynes, ed. The Speeches of Adolf Hitler, April 1922-August 1939, Vol. 1 of 2, pp. 19-20, Oxford University Press, 1942)
“We were convinced that the people needs and requires this faith. We have therefore undertaken the fight against the atheistic movement, and that not merely with a few theoretical declarations: we have stamped it out.” -Adolf Hitler, in a speech in Berlin on 24 Oct. 1933
There you go. More can be found at http://www.evilbible.com/hitler_was_christian.htm
3/9/2012 1:03:32 PM
Hell is Real
Alright, you got that from evilbible.com. Shocker! Just becuase Hitler said those things doesn't mean anything. I could be the next president and say atheism is wonderful and say how religion poisons everything. But I am a Christian at heart. Hitler used Christianity do get what he wanted. He used religion as a weapon. He wanted to brainwash people and he sadly did by bringing up Christianity.
Anyhow, what does Hitler have to do with Jesus? Let's say Hitler believed in Jesus what does that have to do with Jesus? You take a look at all the evil in the world and blame Jesus? Isn't that messed up to blame God for the way people act. People do and commit evil crimes every single day does that mean we have to blame God and hate Christianity and hate the Bible. No it shouldn't be that way. I can name a lot of evil atheist in the world too. Does that mean I hate all atheist no. See the problem is that people like you generalize. You say oh Hitler was a Christian let's blame Christianity for the holocaust when it was the evilness inside of hitler and the nazi's who are to blame. Not Jesus. It's humans who destroy the earth not Jesus.
It's like looking at what Bernard Madoff did and say all Jews are money hungry therfore I hate Jewish people.
That's what you are doing.
3/9/2012 1:42:48 PM
Hitler was Jewish by the way
The Rockefeller family and the Rothschild family are from the same bloodline. Even though money flowed to Hitler in enormous sums from the Rockefeller family, Hitler was a Rothschild. He was part Jewish too. The Rothschild's weren't their original name, for they went by several before choosing Rothschild.
3/9/2012 1:51:25 PM
Hitler was Jewish by the way
One of their earlier family surname was Bauer(s) — one of the most notorious cult bloodlines of Middle Ages Germany. The name Rothschild came into being in the 18th century (note the close resemblance to rotes-schilde or "Red-Shield") when a working member of the Illuminati, one Mayer Amschel Rothschild, took the name from the red-shield or hexagram; also known as the the Star of David or Seal of Solomon.
Most are not aware that the Star of David (which was originally red) did not become affiliated with the so-called Jewish race until after Rothschild adopted it for themselves. So-called Jewish resources will tell you the star has a connection to David or Solomon, but the very ones who started using this symbol made it clear who their allegiance was with...evil.
The Rothschilds had long had a plan to create a religion of their own for the Illuminati in Palestine and that plan involved manipulating Jewish people to settle in that area. One, Charles Taze Russell, of the Illuminati Russell bloodline (the Russell's were one of the creators of the Illuminati) was the same man who founded the Watchtower Society, also known as the Jehovah's Witnesses. He was a Satanist, according to media, also a pedophile according to his wife and most certainly Illuminati. His new religion was funded by the Rothschilds and he was a friend of theirs, just like the Mormons who were also Rothschild-funded through Kuhn, Loeb, and Co.
3/9/2012 1:52:39 PM
Hitler was Jewish by the way
The Rothschilds and the Illuminati produce children brought up under other names with other parents. People, such as ex-president, Bill Clinton, who is most certainly a Rockefeller, and these ordinary kids from ordinary backgrounds go on to be extraordinarily successful in their chosen field.
So Hitler was a part of the Illuminati.
3/9/2012 1:53:17 PM
hitler hated his own race too
Saliva samples taken from 39 relatives of the Nazi leader show he may have had biological links to the “subhuman” races that he tried to exterminate during the Holocaust.
Jean-Paul Mulders, a Belgian journalist, and Marc Vermeeren, a historian, tracked down the Fuhrer’s relatives, including an Austrian farmer who was his cousin, earlier this year.
A chromosome called Haplogroup E1b1b1 which showed up in their samples is rare in Western Europe and is most commonly found in the Berbers of Morocco, Algeria and Tunisia, as well as among Ashkenazi and Sephardic Jews.
"One can from this postulate that Hitler was related to people whom he despised," Mr Mulders wrote in the Belgian magazine, Knack.
Haplogroup E1b1b1, which accounts for approximately 18 to 20 per cent of Ashkenazi and 8.6 per cent to 30 per cent of Sephardic Y-chromosomes, appears to be one of the major founding lineages of the Jewish population.
3/9/2012 1:59:38 PM
3/9/2012 2:01:25 PM
3/9/2012 2:05:55 PM
3/9/2012 2:06:44 PM
3/9/2012 2:08:20 PM
3/9/2012 2:09:42 PM
3/9/2012 2:17:20 PM
3/9/2012 2:32:32 PM
Holy crazy conspiracy theories Batman!
3/9/2012 3:17:49 PM
depopulation is NO conspiracy.
3/11/2012 1:33:32 PM
The Eugenics Movement – the “science” that advocates certain practices to improve the genetic composition of the human population — was widely popular in the early decades of the 20th century. In the United States, the chief proponent of eugenics was the American Eugenics Society, established in 1922. One of its members was Margaret Sanger, an avowed socialist and the founder of the abortion-mill Planned Parenthood.
By the late 20th century, eugenics had fallen into disfavor, having become associated with Nazi eugenics — Hitler’s racially-based social policies that aimed at preserving and improving the purity of the Aryan race through the sterilization and extermination of those identified as “life unworthy of life“, including but not limited to the criminal, degenerate, dissident, feeble-minded, homosexual, idle, insane and the weak.
But eugenics didn’t really go away. Its proponents merely went underground, taking on other guises. They walk among us today as the Rockefellers, the UN’s Agenda 21, the enigmatic Georgia Guidestones, and Obama’s Science Czar John Holdren.
In a 1977 textbook, Holdren advocated the formation of a one-world government that would use a “global police force” to enforce totalitarian measures to depopulate the world.
Judge Obama by the company he keeps.
3/11/2012 1:37:35 PM
Obama walks with John Holdren, Director of the Wnite House's Office of Science and Technology Policy. The Elite’s Plan for Global Extermination Exposed by Dr. Webster Tarpley
Infowars.com – June 19, 2011
Historian and author Webster Tarpley exposes how White House science czar John P. Holdren, who infamously co-wrote a 1977 textbook in which he advocated the formation of a “planetary regime” that would use a “global police force” to enforce totalitarian measures of population control, including forced abortions, mass sterilization programs conducted via the food and water supply, as well as mandatory bodily implants that would prevent couples from having children, is a Malthusian fanatic in the tradition of the arcane anti-human ideology that originated amongst British aristocracy in the 19th century.
Holdren calls himself a “neo-Malthusian” in his own book, and as Tarpley explains, is a historical pessimist who has rejected the idea that America and humanity as a whole can progress through ingenuity, industry and economic growth. Instead, Holdren sees humankind as a cancer upon the earth. Holdren wants to set up a “Science Court,” where potential developments could be blocked by government decree if they don’t conform to the planned society necessary under Holdren’s “planetary regime”. He also seeks to institute “de-development” worldwide to prevent the third world from ever lifting itself out of poverty and roll things back to “pre-industrial civilization” where average life spans would not be much more than 30 years. Holdren’s co-author, Paul Ehrlich, is a discredited crank who wrote books in the 70's claiming that England would not exist as a land mass by the year 2000 because of climate change. As Tarpley explains, Ehrlich’s warning of a “population bomb” has proven incorrect, with population in Europe, Japan and the United States falling when immigration is removed from the equation.
3/11/2012 1:38:47 PM
If you don't belive that a global elite runs the world then you are the one who is blind.
3/11/2012 1:43:10 PM
This has got to be one of the most entertaining trolls ever.
3/11/2012 2:41:56 PM
This site is troll infested
Jesus is God in the flesh, too bad you dumb fools don't get that.
This whole site is an Epic fail.
I'm an entertaining troll eh? At least I am not a dumb A** loser who belives in evolution. What you idiots have been taught is a complete lie. Humans have not changed in over 75,000 years. You are the trolls not me. Even Charles Darwin said he was wrong.
"When thus reflecting I feel compelled to look to a First Cause having an intelligent mind in some degree analogous to that of man; and I deserve to be called a Theist” – Charles Darwin Autobiography
Charles Darwin Admits to Being A Liar
"I may here also confess that as a little boy I was much given to inventing deliberate falsehoods, and this was always done for the sake of causing excitement" - Letters of Charles Darwin
"There is no fundamental difference between man and the higher mammals in their mental faculties” - Charles Darwin Descent of Man
Then he goes on to state the following:
"There can be no doubt that the difference between the mind of the lowest man and that of the highest animal is immense”- Charles Darwin Descent of Man
This site is troll infested with idiot morons who don't think. You Darwin sycophants will never accept that Darwin was a fraud, who sought not to be truthful, but to undermine the truth of God's word rooted in the axiom that God spoke and in six days created the heavens and the earth.
Bunch of losers...
Inserting the finger to all of you.
LnL( º.º )LnL
3/14/2012 11:30:42 AM
Filin De Blanc
Oh goodie, more "Darwin is the only person who ever advanced the theory of evolution, ever, and no-one else has ever bothered checking to see whether Darwin was correct, they just accepted what he had to say for no apparent reason".
Have fundies not ever heard of Alfred Russell Wallace?
3/14/2012 11:39:15 AM
Look, it's trying to get an angry reaction from us, how cute. It's too bad it fails so epically at trolling. Try not to be so butthurt.
3/14/2012 12:38:44 PM
Alfred Russell Wallace? I never had an atheist fundie mention that name, gee it's something new. Thanks fillin de blanc. I'll take note of that. So now I know that darwin plagiarized wallace
3/14/2012 1:00:12 PM
Here are some more names:
"It is almost invariably assumed that animals with bodies composed of a single cell represent the primitive animals from which all others derived. They are commonly supposed to have preceded all other animal types in their appearance. There is not the slightest basis for this assumption."—*Austin Clark, The New Evolution (1930), pp. 235-236.
"Evolutionism is a fairy tale for grown-ups. This theory has helped nothing in the progress of science. It is useless."—*Bounoure, Le Monde Et La Vie (October 1963) [Director of Research at the National center of Scientific Research in France].
"The creation account in Genesis and the theory of evolution could not be reconciled. One must be right and the other wrong. The story of the fossils agreed with the account of Genesis. In the oldest rocks we did not find a series of fossils covering the gradual changes from the most primitive creatures to developed forms, but rather in the oldest rocks developed species suddenly appeared. Between every species there was a complete absence of intermediate fossils."—*D.B. Gower, "Scientist Rejects Evolution," Kentish Times, England, December 11, 1975, p. 4 [biochemist].
3/14/2012 1:22:48 PM
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10