magonia #conspiracy

magonia #conspiracy indigosociety.com

There has been many reports of silent and unmarked helicopters throughout the United States. They have also been reports of apparent sightings of these "silent helicopters" in conjunction with UFO sightings such as the Cash Landrum encounter (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cash-Landrum_incident).

These helicopters use a McDonnell Douglas NOTAR (no tail rotor) technology (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NOTAR) and they are referred to as MH-X Advanced Special Operations Helicopter as used in the assassination of Bin Laden http://www.globalsecurity.org/milita...craft/mh-x.htm. These technologicals makes these helicopters virually silent.

There has been strong evidence that these advanced helicopters have been used domestically in the United States in what is call black operations (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_operation), some directed at private citizens. They have on board sophisticated technology including infrared, and advanced listening surveillance equipment. It has also possible some form of ultra sonic weapon installed.

There has been numerous photographs of these are other types of helicopters being used for domestic intelligence gathering, including on those who have had closed encounters, and have reported UFO sighting. With the domestic unrest in the United States they usage will be increased dramatically.

14 comments

old comment by Jockaira

These helicopters are very high-tech and very high cost. It is amazing that the people in charge of gathering this important intelligence would not elect to use cheaper means for their gathering such as phone-taps, surreptiously-placed microphones, and that good old stand-by, paid snitches. All these latter methods make much better use of the taxpayer's dollar than a $20 million helicopter that costs about $2000 hourly just to fly, not to mention the crew costs and the possibility of a multi-million dollar crash such as happened in Pakistan while they were trying to make an arrest of Usama bin Laden.

As an interesting comment, the helicopter which crashed in Pakistan was not a notar-type as shown by the photographs of the tail section with rotor blades in place. This whole spiel is nothing but bullshit!!

Check it out yourself: http://theaviationist.com/category/stealth-black-hawk/

This page also includes the whole story on the false MH-X designation, but I'm sure that's just a cover for the real conspiracy. (sarcasm)

old comment by Doubting Thomas

If you want to make your conspiracy theory sound scary, always use the word "unmarked" when referring to aircraft. Just like the "black helicopter" sightings where people were seeing dark OD-green helicopters overhead which would appear black against a bright sky. Military helicopters are marked, though with subdued black paint against a green background it's hard to see from the ground. Therefore, "unmarked" helicopters!

The same claim was made against "chemtrail sprayplanes." People were taking telephoto pictures of airliners flying overhead at 30,000 feet and claiming they were "unmarked" in the blurry photographs. How the hell are you supposed to see any markings on an aircraft that high up, especially since they typically don't paint markings on the underside of commercial aircraft?

old comment by Anon

I am an aircraft engineer, and I have spent the majority of my career working on helicopters.
It is impossible to make a helicopter "virtually silent" because of two factors:
1) Gas turbine engines make a huge amount of noise from both the exhaust and the rotating assembly, it is impossible to silence these currently because the weight of material required to insulate them enough to quieten them by any significant amount would make the entire aircraft too heavy to fly.
2) The amount of aerodynamic noise produced by the rotors is also huge, this is not something that can be altered, as this noise is caused directly by the effect the blades have on the air, the only way to remove this noise is to either remove the blades (which wouldn't work very well for the airworthiness) or reshape the blades so as to not disturb the air so much, which would remove the lift created (also pretty bad for airworthiness ;-) )

old comment by J. James

Someone clearly has no idea how helicopters work or what operating them entails. The concept of a "noiseless" helicopter is absurd. They're noisy as hell, and if there was a way to change that, it would have been patented and slapped on every corporate chopper decades ago.

More importantly, Helicopters are NOT suitable surveillance aircraft. They are simply incapable of filling that niche. Sure, you can slap a camera on one, but it's like expecting a seal to do the 100-meter dash and do it well, dammit.

To give you an idea how astoundingly awful helicopters would be as stealthy surveillance craft, here are some things that you should know.

Helicopters are expensive. In every sense of the word. They cost millions and millions of dollars for a small, 6-passenger CIVILIAN model. They are incredibly maintennance-intensive, and require an entire full-time crew network to operate. They consume vast quantities of costly aviation fuel at a terrifying rate, and have downright awful endurance- to the tune of having to fly back and refuel every hour and a half or so. They fly at low altitudes. They're as subtle as a tap-dancing elephant. They're slow, vulnerable, fragile and the crash statistics are about as reassuring as a cancer diagnosis. Convinced yet?