Quote# 86157

The creationist advocacy group Answers in Genesis has suggested that the real aim of the animal rights is to justify abortion - if human beings are no better than animals, and if we can kill animals when we want (as for food or clothing), why can't we kill unborn humans?

Conservapedia, Conservapedia-Animal Rights 68 Comments [2/23/2012 4:32:34 AM]
Fundie Index: 108

Username  (Login)
Comment  (Text formatting help) 

1 2 3 | bottom

Wow, not only are those some insane leaps of logic, some of them actually go 180 degrees backwards...impressive mental gymnastics.

2/23/2012 4:41:18 AM


So if the aim is to tell people to not kill animals on a whim, that will somehow convince people that humans can be killed on a whim?


2/23/2012 4:46:44 AM


I've got to admit: I never thought of AiG as an advocacy group. I can kind of see that, if what you're advocating is increased stupidity.

2/23/2012 4:50:15 AM


The New-Ager conspiracy theorist and all-around kook David Icke has suggested that most world leaders are actually reptilian aliens called Annunaki.

Answers in Genesis is no less wrong.

2/23/2012 5:17:19 AM


i thought that answers in genesis was a poe site? now i really hope it is

2/23/2012 5:18:28 AM


Is Conservapedia the biggest Poe site on the net. It certainly is stretching credibility to its limits if not.

2/23/2012 5:19:10 AM


Ahhhh....start my morning....go to FSTDTs....get my morning dose of mind-blowing stupid....got an unusually high dose of it! So much stupid in one paragraph! Nothing can contain the VAST AMOUNT OF PURE EL STUPIDO IN THIS ONE!

Had a great laugh...thanx, fundies.

2/23/2012 5:19:56 AM


Is - is Conservapedia saying we shouldn't kill animals for food or clothing? Cos it certainly looks that way. Damn green hippies.

2/23/2012 5:20:34 AM


2/23/2012 5:30:13 AM


It's the other way around, idiot! Animals deserve as much respect and consideration as humans.
Many humans say we CAN'T kill animals for food or clothing. Vegans, for example.

Why this fixation on abortions? They happen, whether you like it or not, all we can do is make sure they are safe.
Each child has the right to be born wanted, expected and loved.

2/23/2012 5:35:34 AM

Its conservapedia. These people exist in some weird alternate reality. I cannot read one article on their site without laughing or getting extremely pissed about their lies and nonsense. I just read that science has proven that abortions increase the risk of breast cancer and that women's health has improved in Poland as a direct result of the outlawing of abortion. Unbelievable nonsense!

2/23/2012 6:26:29 AM


Defending animal rights?

Trying to eliminate world hunger?

I accidently drove over my own cat?

Et cetera, et cetera, et cetera.....

2/23/2012 6:27:32 AM


I think animals should not be abused or mistreated, but I reject the notion of animal "rights".

I do, however, support abortion rights for women.

So where does that put me?

2/23/2012 6:29:11 AM

Mister Spak

I suggest Conservapedia is a front group for mental illness - if creationism must be taken seriously, why shouldn't other nonsense like Islam or Elvis is aliveism be taken serioously?

2/23/2012 6:30:25 AM


You've got it completely ass-backwards, as usual. The animal rights people DON'T want us to kill animals. That's kind of the whole freaking point. Equating killing animals to abortion and then justifying abortion would kind of violate their whole freaking philosophy.

2/23/2012 6:44:39 AM

Doubting Thomas

Well, that's what you get for believing anything from Answers in Genesis. But as far as credibility goes, AiG and Conservapedia are on the same level. That is, they have none.

2/23/2012 7:00:26 AM

Brendan Rizzo

Um, wouldn't support for animal rights imply the opposite?

2/23/2012 7:13:31 AM


"The creationist advocacy group Answers in Genesis has suggested that the real aim of the animal rights is to justify abortion - if human beings are no better than animals, and if we can kill animals when we want (as for food or clothing), why can't we kill unborn humans?"

If some animals are protected from being hunted and creationists claim that humans aren't animals then why can't we hunt creationists?

See? I can play that game too. It just hurts my brain and makes me feel all icky when I do it. Apparently it doesn't bother you creationist morons.

2/23/2012 7:33:09 AM


Insane Troll Logic got nothing on fundie-mental reasoning.

2/23/2012 7:42:59 AM


The real aim of animal rights advocacy is to keep yahoos like you from abusing animals.

P.S. Human beings ARE animals.

2/23/2012 7:52:48 AM

"The creationist advocacy group Answers in Genesis..."

Hey, if you're going to use total kooks as your best source, let's ask the Time Cube guy what he thinks about it!

2/23/2012 7:57:03 AM

Table Rock

And why can't we eat humans and wear their skins as clothing? And can I have the whole lot of you at Conservapedia neutered?

2/23/2012 7:57:45 AM


Usually I can kind of tell how these quotes make sense in fundie-logic, even if they wouldn't make sense to normal people. But this one doesn't even make sense in fundie-logic.

2/23/2012 8:16:02 AM


Finally!!!! I can get that full-length fetal coat I've always dreamed about!!!!! SOOOOOO Luxurious!!!!

2/23/2012 8:22:31 AM


How stoned do you have to be for this to make sense?

2/23/2012 8:29:27 AM

1 2 3 | top: comments page