Home Archives Random Quotes Latest Comments Top 100 Submit Quote Search Log In

Quote# 86157

The creationist advocacy group Answers in Genesis has suggested that the real aim of the animal rights is to justify abortion - if human beings are no better than animals, and if we can kill animals when we want (as for food or clothing), why can't we kill unborn humans?

Conservapedia, Conservapedia-Animal Rights 68 Comments [2/23/2012 4:32:34 AM]
Fundie Index: 106
WTF?! || meh
Username:
Comment:



1 2 3
Night Jaguar

"if we can kill animals when we want (as for food or clothing), why can't we kill unborn humans?"

Yep, animal rights activists want us to eat and wear dead babies.

2/23/2012 8:37:23 AM

J. James

Or, you know, they're actually concerned about the welfare of animals and that they're treated humanely.

2/23/2012 8:38:15 AM

Seeker Lancer

Except the goal of the animal rights movement is to NOT kill animals.

2/23/2012 8:48:30 AM

John

So people who say "don't kill animals" are really saying "let's kill fetuses"?

2/23/2012 9:06:26 AM

Anon-e-moose

"why can't we kill unborn humans?"

Oh, indeed (emphasis added)...:

Hosea 13:16: 'Samaria will be held guilty, For she has rebelled against her God. They will fall by the sword, Their little ones will be dashed in pieces, And their pregnant women will be ripped open.'

...what's stopping you? It certainly didn't stop Timothy McVeigh, when he killed 19 children amongst the 168 people in the Alfred P. Murrah Building in Oklahoma City. After all, you lot rely on just one part of the Old Testament - Leviticus - to justify your anti-LGBT bigotry.

When the very God you worship doesn't say word one in condemning* abortion - but actually orders it - your entire 'Pro-Life' cause is annihilated. You (as men) certainly don't have the right to even think of telling women what they can or can't do with their own bodies. That's why Roe vs. Wade exists.

Your own God Emperor George Dumbya Bush did enough killing of unborn humans when the attacks in Iraq & Afghanistan he ordered murdered pregnant women in those countries. Question: Are they no better than animals? Because if your answer is the only one possible, not only your argument, and your 'Pro-Life' cause, but your very religion, nay, your right-wing thinking based on such, is blasted out of the space-time continuum, and you have no choice but to become Left-wing, Atheist, and Pro-Choice.

Clint Eastwood is Pro-Choice. Also Pro-LGBT. Gonna tell him - previously a Reagan-supporter - to his face, that he's wrong? Go ahead. Make his - and my day.

*- Jesus doesn't say word one in condemning homosexuality in the entirety of the New Testament, neither. Therefore you don't have the right to be anti-LGBT.

--EDIT--

@Reynardine

"This is profoundly counterlogical."

Well, this is Conservapoodia. The land that Logic forgot.

2/23/2012 9:07:49 AM

Reynardine

This is profoundly counterlogical.

2/23/2012 9:44:09 AM

Berny

Complete logic fail.
Typical Conservatardia nonsense.
Next!

2/23/2012 10:12:08 AM

whoanelly

You people bitch about PETA all the time because they DON'T want to kill animals. Remember?

2/23/2012 10:17:02 AM

Jessica

I am stunned, stunned at the lack of logic here.
What they are saying is if it's wrong to harm animals than it's all right to allow abortion.
And people who write such things are listened to as if they are serious, and allowed to vote.
Blimey!

2/23/2012 10:27:29 AM

D Laurier

And we know how sane the AIG people are...
ie; not at all.

2/23/2012 11:03:02 AM

c4ndide

Night Jaguar,

Remember that some douche from the Oklahoma legislature did try to introduce a bill preventing fetal tissue from being used in food products. They actually believe that we're all one step away from baby-eating.

2/23/2012 12:10:37 PM

Frank

How many foetuses would I need to make a nice coat?

2/23/2012 12:22:10 PM

nazani14

It's best to abort them in the "softshell" stage; those teensy bones can ruin a good meal.

2/23/2012 12:27:41 PM

Old Viking

The real aim of the Fartanywhere movement is to justify farting in church. If you can fart in the bathtub, why not church?

2/23/2012 12:40:48 PM

Randy

First, the idea of animal rights is a non-starter as animals are incapable of reciprocating rights the same way humans can with one another.

One of the criticisms against animal rights is that extending rights to animals will, in the long run, be detrimental to human rights in various ways. Various religious and conservative thinkers have written on this subject from time to time over the years and have given the reasons they think this.

With that said, I can't recall anyone trying to connect the two issues in this way.


2/23/2012 12:53:19 PM

checkmate

If Conservapedia had any balls they could easily have worked their pet peeves into that: SUV's, climate change, Obama's birth certificate, Islam, Demoncrats, atheism, ...

Actually it's pretty clear why Conservapedia is against animal rights: if they don't have to treat animals decently, then they think that also applies to the people they think of as monkeys; you know, 'darker' people.

2/23/2012 1:07:34 PM

Phoenix

Ok, someone make these fundies head back to school and copy the following a 100 times.

A fetus is not a person.
A fetus is not a person.
A fetus is not a person.
A fetus is not a person.
A fetus is not a person.
A fetus is not a person.
A fetus is not a person.
A fetus is not a person.
A fetus is not a person.
A fetus is not a person.
A fetus is not a person.
A fetus is not a person.
A fetus is not a person.
A fetus is not a person.
A fetus is not a person.
A fetus is not a person.
A fetus is not a person.
A fetus is not a person.
A fetus is not a person.
A fetus is not a person.
A fetus is not a person.
A fetus is not a person.
A fetus is not a person.
A fetus is not a person.
A fetus is not a person.
A fetus is not a person.
A fetus is not a person.
A fetus is not a person.
A fetus is not a person.
A fetus is not a person.
A fetus is not a person.
A fetus is not a person.
A fetus is not a person.
A fetus is not a person.
A fetus is not a person.
A fetus is not a person.
A fetus is not a person.
A fetus is not a person.
A fetus is not a person.
A fetus is not a person.

2/23/2012 1:09:01 PM

John

the real aim of the animal rights is to justify abortion

No, no - it's to help Satan take over the world. Bear with me on this: what's the opposite of God? Dog! So by insisting on rights for dogs, we're really insisting on the right to oppose God. And who's the biggest opposer of God? Satan! So it's Satan who benefits from animal rights. And don't forget, Jesus said God would separate the sheep from the goats. But animal rights activists want to improve things for sheep and goats equally. That mean's they're undoing God's work. And who wants to undo God's work? You guessed it - Satan!

2/23/2012 1:32:10 PM

Prager

Toxic Teflon Alert!!!

2/23/2012 1:53:34 PM

breakerslion

Most people are animals. Assfly is a vegetable.

There are no unborn humans.

All the living matter that was killed to keep a YEC alive was a waste.


@Mudak

"I've got to admit: I never thought of AiG as an advocacy group. I can kind of see that, if what you're advocating is increased stupidity."

Of course they are! Ignorant people do not question authority. Ignorant people are gullible, and do not question illogical statements if the person making them sounds sure of him/herself. Ignorant people vote for the candidates of the wealth and power elite against their own interests as long as some stupid manufactured hot button keeps getting pushed. Dumb = Profit!

2/23/2012 2:26:46 PM

aaa

I want future generations to know just how absurd things are now.

2/23/2012 2:48:45 PM

Skatepunk

Animal Rights = abortion.

Makes perfect sense!

2/23/2012 3:00:48 PM



That is so ass-backwards it'd be amazed if they can walk forward in a straight line.

2/23/2012 3:14:16 PM

Drummer

Um... No

2/23/2012 4:26:04 PM

Philbert McAdamia

@
Jessica
I am stunned, stunned at the lack of logic here.

So am I, and my Norwegian Blue. They do stun easily, though

-------------------------

@ nazani14
It's best to abort them in the "softshell" stage; those teensy bones can ruin a good meal.

But it wouldn't be called "Crunchy Baby", then would it?

2/23/2012 5:24:48 PM
1 2 3