Home Archives Random Quotes Latest Comments Top 100 Submit Quote Search Log In

Quote# 86229

The Apartheid analogy is wrong. Both Nazism and Liberalism are designed to exterminate a certain segment of the population. Nazism targeted certain races while Liberalism targets decent and intelligent people. Apartheid simply aims separation. I wish we had Apartheid where decent and intelligent people would be separated and put into our own ghettos. But Liberalism has no interest in separation of any kind. Liberalism is designed for the complete elimination of decent and intelligent people, giving us a pure Idiocracy.

There are some differences between Nazism and Liberalism. Nazism, coming from Germany, was more efficient and aimed for rapid extermination, while Liberal extermination is a slower process. This is why we have no death camps. Also, Nazism was intentional, the Germans being fairly intelligent people, while Liberalism is unintentional, since Liberals are fools. Liberals do not consciously want to eliminate anyone, but they are repulsed by decent people and, through Feminism, they have unintentionally managed to create a system that is highly effective at genetically eliminating decent people. And this is why all of you incels are here.

fschmidt, Love-Shy 58 Comments [2/27/2012 4:16:23 AM]
Fundie Index: 74
WTF?! || meh
Username:
Comment:



1 2 3
Anon-e-moose

South Africa: Those not White treated as second-class citizens. In every way.

fschit's 'Gor'-esque mind: Those without a 'Y' chromosome treated as second-class citizens In every way.

...nope, not seeing how sexism isn't an analogy equal with racism, fschit. Least of all how - in Australia - leader of the Labour Party and Prime Minister Julia Gillard won her leadership battle against her rival Kevin Rudd in a 2/3rds majority vote.

Rudd resigned.

And there's me thinking that Australia was filled with sexists...? Well, I guess that liberal thinking annihilates stereotypes. Good.

PROTIP: In Australia, 'Liberal Democrats' are as right-wing as the Teabaggers in the US.

'Advance Australia Fair' indeed.

Here in the UK, Labour (who I vote for): centre left. Conservative: centre right. Liberal Democrat: 'middle of the road'. Geo-politically, and therefore educationally & intellectually inferior much, fshit? Ergo, misogyny is dying. Q.E. and D., bitch. Deal with it.

2/27/2012 9:14:28 AM

Thinking Allowed

I wish we had Apartheid where decent and intelligent people would be separated and put into our own ghettos.

I don't think fschmidt knows what the definition of ghetto is.

ghetto [get-oh]
noun, plural ghet·tos, ghet·toes.

1.a section of a city, especially a thickly populated slum area, inhabited predominantly by members of an ethnic or other minority group, often as a result of social or economic restrictions, pressures, or hardships.

2.(formerly, in most European countries) a section of a city in which all Jews were required to live.
3. a section predominantly inhabited by Jews.

4.any mode of living, working, etc., that results from stereotyping or biased treatment: job ghettos for women; ghettos for the elderly.

2/27/2012 9:18:15 AM

Sasha

Well, I learned a new word: "incel" as in "involuntary celibate." Seems as though Love-Shy is a system that is highly effective at genetically eliminating obnoxious people. Congrats, or something.

2/27/2012 9:20:18 AM

Reynardine

And he admits, at last, that that's the cause of his weird rant? He never gets any? Did anyone ever ask him what God gave people hands for?

2/27/2012 9:32:57 AM

Berny

Since liberal-minded individuals have the monopoly on intelligence and decency, by your logic we'd wan't to exterminate ourselves.
Intelligent conservatives have been in exceedingly short supply since William F. Buckley died. A decent conservative is an oxymoron.

2/27/2012 10:09:15 AM

nazani14

Liberals do want to eliminate a class of people, by making the poor middle-class. Not the same as eliminating actual people.

Rick Santorum, in contrast, thinks "The poor are always with us" is just dandy.

2/27/2012 11:49:50 AM



Going by what I've read in all of your posts here, including this one, you are neither decent nor intelligent. You are a misogynistic imbecile.

2/27/2012 12:30:19 PM

Fundies Make Me Sick

The fact that you speak of Nazism in a positive light, as if it was a good thing, means you forfeit the right to criticize anyone for any reason, ever. STFU and DIAF.

2/27/2012 1:19:06 PM

Rabbit of Caerbannog

"Ah, but Love-Shy is already a self-segregated ghetto of misogynists that don't understand why being an asshole to women doesn't get them laid."

After searching their quotes here, yeah you appear to be correct on the matter. Good grief how can people say things like this?...

2/27/2012 1:38:14 PM

aaa

There is a reason why women hate you. It's because of your utterly moronic personality, your absurd ideology and your inability to see your own flaws. There are no redeemable features about you.

2/27/2012 3:35:14 PM

Old Viking

What would you conceivably know about decency and intelligence?

2/27/2012 4:13:29 PM

whoanelly

He's a radical conservative and historical revisionist as well as a misogynist? Surprising.

2/27/2012 6:39:10 PM

D Laurier

"The Apartheid analogy is wrong. Both Nazism and Liberalism are designed to exterminate a certain segment of the population."
WRONG.
Neither Nazism nor Liberalism were designed to do any such thing.
Nazism was designed to appeal to a poorly educated public. Liberalism was designed to reflect the virtues of a well educated public.

"Nazism targeted certain races while Liberalism targets decent and intelligent people. Apartheid simply aims separation."
WRONG.
Nazism and apartheid both aim to preserve the privlege of a group who claim to be a superior "race", chosen by a god name Gott. They both rely on violence to enforce their notions of "race" since reality doesnt support them.
Liberalism points out the sheer absurdity of the idea of "race".

2/27/2012 7:37:42 PM

D Laurier

Not to brag here but... I'm not particularly great to look at, and I still need a rocketship to reach the poverty line, but I've slept with a few ardent feminists in my time.



2/27/2012 7:42:31 PM

tranz2deep

Let me explain why people like fschmidt here like to proclaim they are the bastions of intellectualism.

In Tehran after the fall of the Shah, Iranian torturers under the Ayatollah felt they were not being respected for their work, so they asked to be called "Doctor" as they use what they considered to be medical precision in their interrogations.

I trust I do not have to spell out the correlation any further?

2/27/2012 8:00:07 PM

Shadoboy

Wow, not sure if troll or massively stupid.

2/27/2012 10:14:23 PM



Not a troll, sadly.

2/27/2012 10:17:01 PM

rebel

Actually, I too, would like to separate intellectuals and rational people from the idiots who wish to stamp on others' rights. It would be very amusing to watch them rip each other to shreds.

@Anon e moose, being an Australian and a woman, I wanted Rudd to win.
Not being sexist, but she basically stole his job without a vote from the Australian (public) people. At least none I was aware of. Plus I'm not keen on the carbon tax being as high as it is. Though, I digress, I don't know anything about politics.
I would love to see a woman PM someday, but one elected by the people of Australia.

Now the choice is between ultra conservative Abbot from the Liberal party (blech!) and Gillard from the Labour party, who has lost the trust of the people. I worry for our next election.

My vote is for the Sex Party.

Yes, we have a political party called the Sex party.

2/27/2012 10:45:00 PM

Shockna

Huh. Given the source, I was expecting a rape apologist. That usually seems to be the case.

Also, Loveshy isn't all that bad a place, sometimes. The idea is to give people bad at relationships for whatever reason (extreme social anxiety, autism, introversion, etc.) a community. Issue is that half the people there are giant assholes. >_>

2/27/2012 10:50:19 PM

ScrappyB

Sorry fschmidt, you're still behind nautical999 and Ronald E. Williams on the top 100. But with a few more entries like this, I'm sure you'll have a shot at hitting the list twice.

2/28/2012 1:55:31 AM

Lpopman

Dude can't get laid, and blames the durn Liberals.

I'd call him a dick, but dicks are useful...

2/28/2012 2:08:53 AM

CC

Wow, they issued a permanent IP ban on me as soon as I clicked the link. I've never had that happen before.

2/28/2012 12:11:40 PM

Agahnim

Nazism is basically a form of fascism, so of course it's bad news.

Fascism is also extremely far right-wing, so liberalism is on the wrong side of the political spectrum. Oops. Fail.

By the way, ever notice that liberty, liberate, and liberal have similar word roots? Yeah, didn't think you did.

2/28/2012 6:20:53 PM

KittyKaboom

Let's see...

Paranoid, conservative (fundy) argument: check.
Racist/misogynistic views: check
Conspiracy theories: check.

A trifecta! :: golf clapping :: Well done!

2/28/2012 7:58:59 PM

Often Partisan

"Liberalism is designed for the complete elimination of decent and intelligent people, giving us a pure Idiocracy."

3 Words.

John. Stuart. Mill.

Read some.

(Mill advocated vigourous debate and discussion to ensure that people got as close to the truth, were as educated and developed as far as possible).

2/29/2012 5:00:03 PM
1 2 3