The children of the angels are the neanderthal (Genesis 6); We existed before them, they have larger brain cavities, stronger muscles, they were canabolistic and very violent, the mtDNA demonstrates we did not or could not productively mate with them, nor did we 'evolve' from them. And pragmatically speaking we would have evolved to them because they were superior in every physical way. They all died off "some how" which is clearly explained by the flood;
21 comments
Well he got one thing right, we didn't evolve from Neanderthals, they diverged along a separate evolutionary path, if I remember my biology textbooks correctly, however we did interbreed with them, there have been skeletons found.
"Well he got one thing right, we didn't evolve from Neanderthals, they diverged along a separate evolutionary path, if I remember my biology textbooks correctly, however we did interbreed with them, there have been skeletons found."
. . . and if traits may be diminished by hybridization, the angels may have giant brow ridges, basketball-sized brain pans, and builds like Jerome Bettis squared. Don't screw with the angels.
<<Holy shit either FSTDT has gotten better at finding fundies being stupid or the world is getting signifigantly dumber by the month. Although I havn't dug through all the archives so I can;t be certain december is by far the best/worst month I have seen since coming to the site.>>
"...the angels may have giant brow ridges, basketball-sized brain pans, and builds like Jerome Bettis squared."
We did not evolve from them, they are our closest relative. Our closest living relative, of course, is the chimpanzee, then the gorilla, bonobo, and orangutan. They are related to us the way a cousin is- a common ancestor. A museum at Yale recently reconstructed the Neandertal, and it looks very human, quite unlike those in bad movies.
Hey!
You, OTOH, are 100% shit.
The children of the angels are the neanderthal (Genesis 6);
What did this poor creature -->
image
...have to fornicate with, to get this creature -->
image
they were canabolistic and very violent
Humans have also been (and occasionally, still are) cannibalistic, and the violence a creature can inflict is directly proportional to its intelligence and cunning. Remember the WWII? More than 20 million dead - not a single actual Neanderthal involved.
the mtDNA demonstrates we did not or could not productively mate with them
It has been scientifically proven beyond any doubt that Neanderthals did actually crossbred with humans, as is evident from their genetic markers found in all non-African races.
They all died off "some how" which is clearly explained by the flood;
They all died off because our ancestors were better at communication, and were faster, smarter, and VASTLY superior at tool/weapon making.
You seem to have forgotten that there is no such thing as Neanderthals. Those foolish evolutionists just found the skeleton of an old man who was bowed over by arthritis and rickets and mistook it for a subspecies of humanity, remember? Its true, Kent Hovind even said so!
@Lacan
What did this poor creature -->
I'm guessing Mars' mom. My first clue was his post.
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.
