We want big government? You think that?
57 comments
"We want big government? You think that?...."
"...For starters, how about a return to Sodomy Laws."
Yes, yes you are, you stupid bastard.
I love when the contradicts themselves so quickly"
Wow, how can you say "We don't want big government." with pride one second and with the VERY NEXT BREATH, say with scorn, "Libertarians want the nanny state out of the bedroom."
Sense, you make none. I can't imagine the sheer lack of thought it takes to say something like that.
"Obammie?"
Sounds racist to me.
Sodomy laws are what killed Alan Turing, you know. (Yeah, different country, but the same principles apply.)
Please don't do this. The US, which more importantly, is my country, would be ridiculed even more than it already is. It's bad enough already.
Conservative values of small, unobtrusive government?
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
You gotta be shittin' me! They throw that out the SECOND there's someone with small enough numbers to oppress!
Oh, and since you appear to be stupid, there have always been homosexuals in the military. Also, how the fuck would you define "nanny state"? Seriously, if you can't see the blindly obvious self-contradiction of the sentence "'get the nanny state outta my bedroom' attitudes screwed things up for conservatism", then you are beyond help.
And lastly, since you seem to be such a fucking history buff what with the Sodomy laws and all that, here's a history lesson for ya: Conservatism has been tried. Several times. It has failed over and over and over again. Choked to death by it's own greed and oppression, and then rescued by the taxpayers. The Gilded Age. The Roaring Twenties. Reaganomics and the Bush Tax Cuts. History has put the writing on the wall: you and your entire backwards, pathetic way of life are a FAILURE.
{For starters, how about a return to Sodomy Laws. What’s wrong with that? All 50 states used to have them. And we were a better, more prosperous county then as well. }
You're talking about when racism, segregation and McCarthy witch hunts were rampant, right?
{But noooo.... You libertarians with your progressive “get the nanny state outta my bedroom” attitudes screwed things up for conservatism. }
Aww. Like some cheese with that whine? People like you have said this for years. Now you're flip-flopping like an immature child simply because some people enjoy their freedoms enough to peacefully engage in things you don't personally approve of.
call me crazy but maybe our past prosperity had more to do with the fact that we had an insanely high tax on the top income bracket, way more blue collar workers were in unions and we were an technological phenom that most industrial countries couldn't keep up with and has less to do with the fact that homosexuals had to have sex in secret
Hey, the progressive "get the nanny state outta my bedroom" also keeps the state out of YOUR bedroom. Or would you like the Government telling you who to shower and or sleep with? Keeping the Government out of the privacy of people's bedrooms helps EVERYBODY, not just the gays!
If you want to decide for people how they should live their lives, you need a big goverment to enforce your laws.
There have always been gays in the military, stupid. They have just kept quiet about their orientation before.
Things are about as bad as when Dubbya was in office, as Mr Obama hasn't done that much to right all the wrongs that Baby Bush did.
I literally cannot comprehend this incredible, all-consuming horror at the knowledge that some people take it up the rear, to the point of wanting laws to changed just so they can be absolutely positive that no-one around them is having anal. If I tried to get laws changed to stop couples from dressing up as superheroes in the bedroom, I would rightly be regarded as completely mental. But buttsex is different, apparently.
You libertarians with your progressive “get the nanny state outta my bedroom” attitudes...
I'm pretty sure wanting the government to stay out of our bedrooms is not solely a libertarian value. How would you feel if you were being intimate with your significant other, and all of a sudden police were pounding on your door trying to make sure y'all weren't having sex in anything other than state-approved ways?
We want big government? You think that?
Liberals may want big government, but at least they want to accomplish something with their big government and want to use it to protect everyone's freedoms. You, on the other hand, want big government so it can spy on your neighbors and see if they're boning someone's ass. What you dumbass freaks don't realize is that you're not immune to this; if the government can spy on your neighbors in the bedroom and in the shower they can sure as hell spy on you, too.
For starters, how about a return to Sodomy Laws. What’s wrong with that?
What's wrong? The very thing you accuse liberals of now: giving government way too much power. You really want to give the government a reason to watch people in their own homes? I can see why your username is Responsibility2nd: you care so much about your retarded ideology that being responsible is merely an afterthought.
bahahaha!!
yes, because where who puts what is really the most important issue. never mind the tanking economy, joblessness, and the national debt racking up over a million dollars a minute. you know whats really important? QUEERS! /sarcasm
"we were a better, more prosperous country"
in short, everything that is wrong today is kind of a straw that broke the camels back deal. you bitch and complain that things suck, but you completely forgot how you got there. america is like a child with ADHD wandering around the forest.
"We want big government? You think that?
You are clueless. I’ll tell you what we SoCons want."
To tell adult, consenting people of the opposite sex - never mind of the same - what to do in the privacy of their own bedrooms.
Ergo, 'Big Government'. Q.E. and D.
Destroyed your own argument, much, 'Small Government'-ers? 'Hypocrisy'. Learn that word. It could save your lives (or at least your credibility).
"Now - thanks to you - we have homo’s in the military and Obammie in office and things are getting worse.
See that ugly steam-iron hotplate-faced, sundial-nosed cunt, Irresponsibility2nd...?:
image
...that's you, that is. >:D
...oh, and it's 4:30.
@#1385948
Freeper.
@Pilotess
Again, I want a job with the sex police! A GOVERNMENT JOB with GOVERNMENT BENEFITS payd with TAX MONEY that comes from those who we police in their bedrooms!
If this moron's (Responsibility2nd) laws ever passed, I'd be the first to sign up for the police force and start investigating the bedrooms of conservative politicians and fundamentalists. They may not have a sense of empathy or reciprocity (so they'll never learn the lesson from that) but it may get them to complain so loud that it gets repealed.
Were Sodomy laws in effect in all 50 states (48 at the time) during the Great Depression?
I think that Responsibility2nd know the answer both questions and that even if correlation = causality his argument is invalid
Ah, yeah, it's all so clear to me now. Anal sex is what has caused the U.S. from becoming "better" and more prosperous. Good to know it wasn't greed, ignorance or religious asshats.
Whoo Hoo, right wing fight! Rednecks versus Randroids, go for it idiots! Fight, fight, fight...
We want big government? You think that?
We want big government? You think that? more government ...
... except giving my tax dollars to Negroes. We don't want that. We just want the government to tell people what we "SoCons" want them to do. But we don't want them actually charging us for it.
What's wrong with sodomy laws? Where do I start? You would be telling other people that they can't have sex with who they're attracted to...you would be telling people what they can and can't do in the privacy of their own home. How would you enforce this law WITHOUT big government?
Also, all the US libertarians I've ever known aren't that friendly to gay people.
(emph-ass-is added)
"You libertarians with your progressive “get the nanny state outta my bedroom” attitudes screwed things up for conservatism. "
A nomination for the 'Finbarr Saunders Award for Unintentional Gratuitous Double-Entendres', anyone...? X3
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.
