Dear Atheists: Welcome to the discussion.
I think it's just fine and dandy that you have a belief, and you have a support group for that belief.
However there ARE a few rules for people professing a religious faith, which you ARE doing.
You have to learn about your belief, so you can explain it. Since you now are now a religious zealot, it is no longer good enough for you to lean back in your chair and just criticize other people.
You have to now live as you believe and believe as you live. Since you proclaim your belief passionately, there is no room for hypocrites. Because you wish to base your life on scientific principles of absolute physical evidence and scientific methods, you may no longer follow astrology or any other occultist practice, such as tarot cards, psychic readings, etc. That means no more Harry Potter movies or books, unless you are really a “Satanist” pretending to be an “atheist”. No more vampire books and movies. Gambling, which is mostly depending on magical “luck”, to the atheist will now be frowned upon, because it truly is faith-based. You have to have a lot of faith to spend hundreds of dollars each year believing that you might win a million $.
I mentioned "scientific methods". Now, you have arrived in the world of science. You now must be able to "prove" everything. For example: You must prove evolution takes place by using real-life examples. If it's just bones dug up, that's not good enough. I want "proof" that a monkey can evolve into a man, not theories. If it’s “scientific”, then you should be able to reproduce it. If you can’t reproduce your scientific theory, then it’s only a theory or a faith-based belief. If your only proof is rolling your eyes and telling me how ignorant I must be, that's not proof. It's stalling. I also want proof that it is possible to create brand new life out of inert substances, so get out your chemistry set. To my knowledge, no human has ever done this before. Richard Dawkins did not have a very good answer when Ben Stein asked him how the first living cell was created. The evolutionist's general answer is:"a lightning bolt struck a pile of mud, and miraculously, a living cell was created that had its own internal organs, its own genetic code, and the ability to reproduce by itself until it magically developed male and female versions of organisms. If you cannot create new life in a laboratory, then all the theorizing about evolution is a mute point. You don’t have evolution if you do not have a beginning.
conservamercan, Fox News Forums 61 Comments
[3/31/2012 6:25:16 AM]
Fundie Index: 90
Submitted By: Wenyandawik
1 2 3
Sorry, I can't follow your wishes. I don't want to be a self-righteous douchecock like you. I mean, you clearly already know the tricks of the trade, and I can see that you're eager to share them. Despite this, I have no interest in mimicking you. Sorry!
4/1/2012 9:04:22 PM
So I have faith I do not believe in the Abrahamic religions, Hinduism, Buddhism, etc.? Uh... no. Just no.
4/2/2012 1:58:22 AM
Enjoying fictional accounts of boy-wizards casting spells at nose-less old people or sparkly speudovampires do not equal following pagan rituals, you non-cognitive troglodite.
4/2/2012 4:29:38 AM
I see that the results of your circlejerks are quite unpleasant.
4/2/2012 12:40:12 PM
Fuck you too.
4/2/2012 1:04:40 PM
Wow, you soooooooooo showed me!
4/2/2012 1:29:38 PM
Mirror, mirror, on the wall,
This guy's a hypocrite after all
4/2/2012 5:10:47 PM
It's kind of amazing and disturbing how they can't imagine living without some kind of dogma dictating things for them.
4/9/2012 5:17:47 PM
word salad,needs ranch
and yeah,i can live like that,i already do....
4/10/2012 6:52:44 AM
"Because you wish to base your life on scientific principles of absolute physical evidence and scientific methods, you may no longer follow astrology or any other occultist practice, such as tarot cards, psychic readings, etc"
So...i still get to be an atheist? Because 'occult' is any belief in the supernatural, like luck, spirits, ghosts...gods and saviors, spirits and souls.
"I mentioned "scientific methods". Now, you have arrived in the world of science. You now must be able to "prove" everything."
Well, no. Science doesn't really do 'prove.' Science is about the best explanations YET provided for the observations collected so far. It may be a really good explanation, and it may explain a WHOLE LOT of observations, but it's still not to the level of a mathematical 'proof.'
But thanks. I do DEARLY love someone who doesn't know what they're talking about telling me how i have to live my life. Once you shoot a harpoon through your own credibility, it's kind of easy to ingore the suggestion.
5/7/2012 12:48:24 PM
5/9/2012 11:17:02 AM
1 2 3