Home Archives Random Quotes Latest Comments Top 100 Submit Quote Search Log In Forums

Quote# 87194

E=mc2 is a meaningless statement in physics that purports to relate light to matter. In fact, no theory has successfully unified the laws governing mass (i.e., gravity) with the laws governing light (i.e., electromagnetism). Simply put, E=mc2 is liberal claptrap.

Biblical Scientific Foreknowledge predicts that a unified theory of all the laws of physics are impossible, because light and matter were created at different times, in different ways, as described in the Book of Genesis.

[Emphasis added]

Andy Schlafly, Conservapedia 101 Comments [5/3/2012 3:14:10 AM]
Fundie Index: 151
WTF?! || meh
Username:
Comment:



1 2 3 4 5
#1398870
Freethinker

I wish Andy would annihilate himself completely. Can you imagine the amount of energy he would yield? Methinks he'd light the world for a year or so.

5/3/2012 3:30:00 AM
#1398872
Serph-no-Okami

Proving Einstein wrong would make one rich and famous instantly. But they would have to work for it and find a better explanation for things like how relativity is ehm, relevant (sorry) when we're talking about GPS satellites and nuclear energy.

And methinks Andy here won't be that person.

5/3/2012 3:39:07 AM
#1398875
Reynardine

Never mind, Andy. You've proven to us already that you're no Einstein.

5/3/2012 3:45:54 AM
#1398877
emau99

How do you explain how nuclear weapons work, Andy?

Or are nukes "liberal claptrap" as well?

5/3/2012 3:46:48 AM
#1398878
Filin De Blanc

Is there anything this guy doesn't think was made up by liberals? Gravity?

5/3/2012 3:47:26 AM
#1398879
Tatch

Yes, then pray tell, how is that we can so precisely calculate the energy output of a nuclear reaction? I wonder which formula they use...

5/3/2012 3:48:30 AM
#1398883
Prager

It frightens me that there are people who listen to this guy and believe his nonsense.

5/3/2012 4:06:10 AM
#1398887


So, you're saying that God could create light and matter, but wasn;t capable of seeing to the minor detail of making them relative to each other in some way?

5/3/2012 4:19:14 AM
#1398888
breakerslion

"Liberal claptrap. Definitely. Liberal claptrap. Ten minutes to Wopner. I'm a very good driver...."

http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/nucene/u235cs.html#c1

We have the math, Assfly. You're brain damaged.

5/3/2012 4:19:32 AM
#1398889
Nerikull

"Simply put, E=mc2 is liberal claptrap. "

Sir, you are not the final arbiter of truth. Just because you fail to understand something doesn't make it false, or some political conspiracy to...do...something.

I think that Japan would have a few words for you on whether it is 'liberal claptrap' or not.

Science, Andy. It works!

5/3/2012 4:20:04 AM
#1398891
Robespierre

I think Andy is trying to out himself as a Poe, but maybe it's just my irrational faith in humanity refusing to be killed.

5/3/2012 4:30:43 AM
#1398892
N. De Plume

So if two rules are made, but they are made on different days, then it is impossible for those rules to harmoniously relate to each other? Well, then no wonder the world is screwed! Governments have been making new rules every day, when they clearly should have stopped that on Day 1!

5/3/2012 4:32:19 AM
#1398896


I can't tell if he's desperate for attention or if he's just incredibly stupid.

5/3/2012 5:12:49 AM
#1398899
Mister Spak

Your entire website is a meaningless statement.

5/3/2012 5:26:56 AM
#1398900


Incredible he manages to fali at scince and theology at the same time.

5/3/2012 5:37:32 AM
#1398903


It's people like Andy Schlafly that put me off fringe craziness like christianity and conservatism and embrace mainstream thinkers like Velikovsky and Sitchin instead.

5/3/2012 5:46:54 AM
#1398905
Panz

And to think, this guy teaches kids. No wonder today's youth gets dumber by the year

5/3/2012 5:47:49 AM
#1398906
dionysus

Simply put, E=mc2 is liberal claptrap.



You're absolutely right! Now please go tell the people of Hiroshima and Nagasaki that relativity is bullshit. They'll appreciate it, I swear.

5/3/2012 5:48:47 AM
#1398907
Brendan Rizzo

Schlafly is a fucking electrician. How in Heaven's name could he possibly be denying this stuff.

5/3/2012 5:50:50 AM
#1398909
Sentry Gun

You mean nukes won't work ? Yay ! Let's invade the USA !

5/3/2012 5:53:34 AM
#1398911
David B.

E=mc² relates energy to mass and velocity, the same as KE = mv²/2. It does not depend on a specific formulation of either gravity or electromagnetism.

Physics Fail.

The bible also says that God made a greater light to govern the day, and a lesser one to govern the night, these being the Sun and Moon. Both the Sun and the Moon (which the bible calls 'lights' remember) also have mass, so a GUT could be perfectly 'biblical' and would no doubt be claimed as such (along with the usual claims that the bible actually predicted it) should one ever be discovered.

Theology Fail.

Two-fer-two, Andy, maintaining your perfect record.

5/3/2012 5:54:45 AM
#1398913
anevilmeme

The Zen Master of Poe strikes again!

5/3/2012 5:58:00 AM
#1398919
Doubting Thomas

What's truly scary is that Andy is or was a homeschool teacher. I mean, it's like the blind leading the blind.

Andy, if you could prove to the scientific community that the theory of relativity is false, I'm sure you'd win a Nobel Prize. However, you're going to have to actually show some work instead of telling them that it's a liberal plot to allow more people to have abortions:

Some liberal politicians have extrapolated the theory of relativity to metaphorically justify their own political agendas. For example, Democratic President Barack Obama helped publish an article by liberal law professor Laurence Tribe to apply the relativistic concept of "curvature of space" to promote a broad legal right to abortion.[64]

http://www.conservapedia.com/Theory_of_relativity

5/3/2012 6:09:57 AM
#1398922
Lpopman

Something ArschFleisch doesn't agree with is "Liberal Claptrap" pt. 98732458962938

5/3/2012 6:23:31 AM
#1398925
smartz

I know I should have stopped reading after E=mc2 because if that is on this website, I know for sure whatever follows it is bound to be nonsensical.

Of course, I actually did read the whole thing to sate my curiousity, lo and behold the contributor is Andy Schlafly. I am not surprised

5/3/2012 6:37:47 AM
1 2 3 4 5