How presumptuous of you, Davey. Most women don't dress in a way you consider provocative just to tease men (much less you personally). They usually dress a certain way because they find it attractive orheaven forbidcomfortable and practical.
Even if we wax feminist and take into consideration the potential effect on women of patriarchal standards and norms (i.e. an unrealistic, objectifying, and male-centric ideal of female beauty and the expectation of women to strive toward that ideal), then any particular woman's provocative wardrobe is most likely, if not still a result of her own personal taste and uncoerced choice, the result of either patriarchy-influenced taste or social expectations, not any conscious desire to "tease" or "attract" men.
...and this is not taking into account the heteronormative assumption that even if a woman were dressing "sexy and sensual" to "seduce" someone, then it is a male. We'll gloss over that, though, since feminism is already too much for you to stand without adding all that queer stuff into it too. Hell, since most people are straight and cisgendered, I usually let such automatic assumptions of sexual orientation and gender identity slide, anyway, provided that they are not specifically intended to exclude, deny, or shame LGBT people.
All of that aside, good grief, dude. There is nothing wrong with finding someone sexually attractive, and you can do it without objectifying them or being creepy. Having a sex drive is perfectly normal. Maybe you wouldn't be so angry all the time if you let go of your self-righteous sexual repression, grabbed your manhood instead, and let yourself rub one out without feeling guilty or blaming others for "making" you do it.
