Site/Off-Topic Discussion Thread
The same reason they regulate, restrict and monitor smoking is the EXACT same reason they should regulate, restrict and monitor homosexuals.
[6/26/2012 3:35:40 AM]
Fundie Index: 62
Text formatting help
I'm not a spambot
Can't handle smoking hot homosexuals?
6/26/2012 3:40:06 AM
They regulate, restrict and monitor smoking because it's a health risk not just to the smoker, but others as well.
Oh please, tell me what health risks gays are subject to that don't also affect straight people. Oh, and the ones they cause to others just by being around them. I'm all ears.
6/26/2012 3:41:25 AM
Filin De Blanc
I'm pretty sure gay sex is banned everywhere smoking is banned already.
6/26/2012 3:47:10 AM
Homosexuality and second-hand homosexuality cause lung cancer and heart disease?
6/26/2012 3:58:43 AM
You're not suffering from second-hand homosexuality, you're first-hand homosexual. Now step slowly from the closet. It will be okay.
6/26/2012 4:02:12 AM
On a related note, they really need to ban polar bears from the tea houses. I mean, it's for the same reason they already ban Allura Red #17 in many food products, obviously.
6/26/2012 4:04:10 AM
Percy Q. Shunn
think they should regulate, restrict and monitor stupidity.
6/26/2012 4:06:27 AM
Once again, homosexuality doesn't cause disease. The HIV virus does, and it doesn't discriminate. If you actually knew anything about medicine, you'd know that the VAST majority of HIV cases worldwide are due to unprotected heterosexual sex.
By your reasoning, heterosexuals should be regulated, restricted and monitored.
6/26/2012 4:25:30 AM
Jezebel's Evil Sister
It's OK to suck. It's OK to blow.
Just don't inhale.
6/26/2012 4:29:18 AM
The same reason they regulate, restrict and monitor smoking is the EXACT same reason they should regulate, restrict and monitor christianists. It causes stupidity like your post.
6/26/2012 4:31:14 AM
I have never inhaled second-hand homosexual. And, contrary to what they may subjectively imagine, I've never heard of any kind of couple setting the house on fire with sex, either.
6/26/2012 4:59:39 AM
Because homosexuals cause cancer too.... er no, they dont.
6/26/2012 5:26:36 AM
Homosexuality causes lung cancer now?
6/26/2012 5:32:22 AM
"The same reason they regulate, restrict and monitor smoking is the EXACT same reason they should regulate, restrict and monitor homosexuals."
Gay people cause lung cancer?
6/26/2012 5:52:31 AM
Freedom- you're doing it wrong.
6/26/2012 6:13:50 AM
Really? You should perform a study on the link between homosexuality and lung cancer and heart disease and publish it in the Lancet or New England Medical Journal.
If your study confirms the cause and effect you will be a medical genius. Either that or you will further prove to the world what an idiot you are by even trying.
6/26/2012 6:14:04 AM
Let me guess, you're taking the slur "dick smoker" literally, aren't you?
6/26/2012 6:20:10 AM
So it would be illegal to have gay sex in restaurants or public buildings? You would be fined the same if you throw a used condom on the street as when you do it with a cigarette butt?
I would imagine that most gay people wouldn’t have a problem with that but somehow I don’t think that was what you meant…
6/26/2012 6:45:21 AM
Being gay doesn't cause lung cancer. You LOSE! GOOD DAY SIR!
Next, you'll be blaming my being Italian-American for your stinky toe fungus.
6/26/2012 6:54:22 AM
Only somebody who thinks they gay men have absolutely no restraint could think this. What, do news stations in the Bible Belt fabricate stories of roving bands of gay men gang-raping good Christian males? Because that seems like something Fox News would do. The Supreme Court has basically allowed news networks to tell boldfaced lies, something unthinkable in any truly civilized country.
6/26/2012 6:55:13 AM
Because gay people place haevier burdens on the NHS than straight people? Wat?
Brendan: And the rape TURNING THEM GAY! Because that's exactly how traumatic experience works.
6/26/2012 6:59:58 AM
Because homosexuality carries over four thousand toxins? I don't think so. It
spread disease, but let's talk about the disease argument against homosexuality. The disease comes from promiscuity and the fact that anal sex carries a high rate of transmission. If anything, it'd make more sense to compare smoking to anal sex, leaving homosexual actions like frot and fellatio, less dangerous than vaginal intercourse, out of the equation.
But this is all a moot point when you boil it down. Ever been to an amusement park? They have 'designated smoking areas' where people smoke while everyone around them can watch. Are you saying we should have 'designated gay sex areas' or just plain old 'designated sex areas' in public places?
6/26/2012 7:02:43 AM
Second-hand Homosexuality Kills! [Citation Needed]
Second-hand Christianity Kills! - I bet children burned as witches in Africa would agree with that one.
6/26/2012 7:24:46 AM
Erm. Smoking and second hand smoke unhealthy for all. Homosexuals are not
6/26/2012 7:24:49 AM
Raised by Horses
Homosexuality involves carcinogenics and is foisted upon people by the public relations industry via massively wealthy backers? Oh, wait. Free Republic. You'd probably be able to jump through mental hoops until you believe that.
Also, I thought you Freeper / Teabagger (Freebagger?) sorts were against Big Government? But apparently that's only when it comes to regulatin' guns and taxes. Gays, women's ovaries and cigarettes are all fair game in Freeperland.
Heh... 'second-hand homosexuality'. I'll have to remember that one.
6/26/2012 7:26:14 AM