1 2 3
#1417834
John
Atheists eat more veal?
6/29/2012 7:14:10 AM
#1417841
Nagol
This screams poe.
6/29/2012 7:20:18 AM
#1417868
Saringuy
indeed. in the 1/100000000 scenario that a baby needs to be eaten, atheists have 20% chance of doing it. there's totally been a research on that subject, guys!
6/29/2012 8:25:28 AM
#1417872
Martine R
Obvious Poe.
6/29/2012 8:31:56 AM
#1417878
Papabear
IgnoranceIsPathetic is pathetic.
6/29/2012 8:49:42 AM
#1417885
J. James
@Reynardine
No way! The best is the traditional Japanese way of serving them as raw, delicate sushi, marbled with delicious brown fat over rice with a variety of savory sauces.
6/29/2012 9:19:58 AM
#1417886
Troll.
6/29/2012 9:22:26 AM
#1417893
Kat S.
Obvious troll is obvious.
6/29/2012 10:07:04 AM
#1417898
Berny
If the OP's handle wasn't enough of a clue, this HAS to be a Poe.
6/29/2012 10:27:49 AM
#1417905
shrike1978
I can't in good conscience even call this one a Poe. Poe's are more subtle than this.
6/29/2012 11:01:27 AM
#1417907
Oh come on! You can't seriously think that this quote was intended to be taken seriously? It's not even a poe, it's just very obvious sarcasm!
6/29/2012 11:09:39 AM
#1417912
Persephone 66
Babies taste just like chicken and are more abundant in the Bible belt.
6/29/2012 11:32:02 AM
#1417916
Vman
How did this get a fundie index of 25? I'd have expected it to be negative (as it's a rather obvious poe).
6/29/2012 11:46:26 AM
#1417924
DarkfireTaimatsu
6/29/2012 12:36:24 PM
#1417927
Meeeh
I love me some good babies - tasty!
But from time to time, I get the munchies for some Mexican:
Last night, I stopped by Red Lobster:
6/29/2012 12:44:25 PM
#1417929
breakerslion
I thought about:
"I want my babyback babyback babyback babyback..."
But then I decided to stick with,
"I got nothin'"
(Poe)
6/29/2012 12:59:14 PM
#1417930
JohnTheAtheist
"Babies are delicious"
- JohnTheAtheist
6/29/2012 1:00:33 PM
#1417945
checkmate
I always throw the babies back. Not enough meat, too much fat.
Btw, studies show that 76,3% of all statistics are thought up spontaneously. ;-)
6/29/2012 2:33:55 PM
#1417946
John_in_Oz
When that story first went around it was about the Jews.
6/29/2012 2:36:03 PM
#1417953
Philbert McAdamia
Mmmmmmm, Jew babies. Kosher. With mustard on rye bread and a glass tea, you'll enjoy it.
6/29/2012 2:47:31 PM
#1417956
Lady Evil
@DarkfireTaimatsu: Is that a Twilight reference?
It's gotta be a Poe. I remember citing the WHO to a stupid fundie (redundant much?)who was ill informed about condoms.
Say, I think I'll cite the WHO right now!
We'll be fighting in the streets
With our children at our feet
And the morals that they worship will be gone
And the men who spurred us on
Sit in judgment of all wrong
They decide and the shotgun sings the song
Oops! Wrong WHO!
6/29/2012 2:51:52 PM
#1417977
Old Viking
What else are you supposed to do with them?
6/29/2012 3:45:53 PM
#1417984
Agahnim
I chuckled at how ridiculous this is.
6/29/2012 4:00:23 PM
#1417988
srsly, citation needed.
% of non-atheist population that eat babies = 0
20 * 0 = 0
therefore no atheist baby eaters exist
6/29/2012 4:13:28 PM
#1417993
Seeker Lancer
This looks more like a joke than real.
6/29/2012 4:38:25 PM
1 2 3