Quote# 88411

The latest establishment scam in the UK, is to describe child prostitutes as “vulnerable children groomed for sexual exploitation”, then talk about them being “passed around” etc, without mention of the fact that these young people agreed to be whores, and are getting paid for it.

The Times is very keen to perpetuate this “child exploitation” narrative – it’s usually Pakistani men who are the pimps and punters (Jons) of these sometimes under-age white girls – and this gives the far right wing EDL the chance to jump on the bandwagon and stir up similar stories about brown men praying on white girls (when it’s more often the other way round, the whores).

Tom Martin, Man Boobz 18 Comments [7/18/2012 6:33:50 AM]
Fundie Index: 22

Username  (Login)
Comment  (Text formatting help) 

1 | bottom


Please tell me how you came by this knowledge, Tom.
Names, dates, accomplices, locations, victims and associates.
Details of the agreement, any drugs involved, ages, parental knowledge, etc.
With your help we'll target the genuinely guilty parties!

7/18/2012 7:21:17 AM

Kat S.

Soooo...what you're saying is:

1.) Pedastry is not a bad thing
2.) The child prostitutes were asking for it and therefore are the real perpetrators and not the men who seek out children.

Wow Tom, you're an a**hole, and I hope you're being monitored by law enforcment in the UK.

7/18/2012 7:28:31 AM

Leighton Buzzard

So, that's how you justify your proclivities, is it Tom? I ain't buying any of it, and I hope you do time, you nonce.

7/18/2012 7:36:18 AM


Age of consent. Have these people heard of it? I don't know how these things work in the UK but, in North America, an adult having sex with someone who is not legally able to consent to it, either due to mental capacity or by actual age, is effectively committing rape. They can say as much as they like that the kid agreed to it, but it's still considered rape by the law.

7/18/2012 8:26:12 AM

Doubting Thomas

without mention of the fact that these young people agreed to be whores, and are getting paid for it.

I don't know what the laws are in the UK, but here in the States it's generally agreed that children can't give consent to have sex. Not to mention the fact that it's just plain wrong to exploit children into becoming prostitutes, let alone having sex with children.

7/18/2012 10:07:55 AM


First, young people cannot make rational decisions because their brains are not fully developed until they hit 24.

Second, you sound like you are advocating young people being groomed for sex which makes you a pedophile.

Finally, perhaps not every prostitute is in it for the fun and the term "whore" shows exactly how much you disrespect people. Of course no one could be as high and might as you, Tom the Pedophile.

7/18/2012 10:20:34 AM


Tom has recently doubled down on his Pro-Pedophilia/child prostitutes aren't raped views:

"Pedophiles should be removed from society and given compassionate treatment for their illness.

Child prostitutes should be put back in school, or if repeat offenders, prosecuted for attempting to profit by preying on the mentally ill pedo population."
I don't say this often but, DIAF Tom.

7/18/2012 11:23:27 AM

Brendan Rizzo

Are we sure this guy's not a Muslim?


7/18/2012 11:35:38 AM


You are rationalising child prostitution. Go away and think about what you did.

7/18/2012 1:40:18 PM

D Laurier

The children being forced into prostitution did not agree to be used as sexual recepticals... and they are not paid for it.

Child prostitutes are forced into submiting to sex by an adult. The same adult who collects the money from the peadophile.

Tom Martin. Please go die in a fire.

7/18/2012 2:42:18 PM


I don't know how young you mean, but a man who has sex with an eleven-year-old is both a pedophile and a rapist, a man over eighteen who has sex with a fourteen-year-old is in most jurisdictions a statutory rapist, and being under the age of majority means lack of contractual capacity. Coercing a woman of any age into prostitution is a very serious offense, and you have quite neatly managed to defame two groups you hate in one morally cretinous statement.

7/18/2012 3:14:54 PM

Raised by Horses

Your user name is 'Man Boobz'. Your argument is invalid.

Also, you're defending child prostitution, so go die in a fire, or at least roast in one until you've seriously considered what you just said.

7/19/2012 3:01:16 AM


Die In A Fucking Fire, you absolute pig-headed moron.

Still, reading the comments, I have to say statutory rape laws in the US are really buckfut stupid too, as ingrained as they might have becomed in the public consciousness. (Any country were I'm commiting a crime when I have sex with my two-years-older-than-me girlfriend just because I passed the magical age of 18 is a wountry with a stupid, stupid way of solving the problem of child abuse.)

7/19/2012 5:41:45 AM


Edit : two-years-younger-than-me *

7/19/2012 5:42:52 AM

Being groomed means you become convinced that you should do what you are asked to do by the bastard that is grooming you... ie: the child prostitute only agrees to be a prostitute because they are effectively brainwashed to agree.

Tom Martin... you are trying to justify the deliberate attempts at manipulating a child into doing what you want it to do... and then blaming them when you succeed. Kindly go jump into a vat of acid.

7/19/2012 11:04:14 AM


We should probably help paedophiles not to harm anyone, and should definitely try and get the child prostitutes back into a normal childhood & education. After all prevention is better than cure, and if you don't fix things they tend to stay broken.

However child prostitutes are not legally able to give consent, and so they are, by definition, victims. Now I can see the odd 14-15 year old post-pubescent seeing prostitution as easy money with the bonus of being able to throw responsibility onto the customer, but that's probably a minority of the ones near enough at age of consent (16 for the UK), let alone actual children.

And for reference, 'Manboobz' is the site that's highlighting this loon. Mr Manboobz himself is a self-defined male feminist who's pastime is highlighting anything anyone says that's misogynistic (in his opinion - your mileage may vary).

7/24/2012 12:24:14 PM


A pedophile apologist. Wow, that is a new one.

Also, please swallow a litre of kerosene and a pound of roofing nails, and toss a lit match down your filthy ignorant gullet.

10/8/2012 8:20:10 PM


Tom Martin is a big deal men's rights activist who also sued his school for anti-male discrimination because he felt that the chairs were "too hard" for men's posteriors but not women's. That should explain a lot about his comment, really.


9/20/2013 12:46:00 AM

1 | top: comments page